A ‘P’alestinian Inconvenient Truth
Error: Contact form not found.
by Yale Zussman

Members of the Palestinian delegation at the United Nations General Assembly celebrate Nov. 29 upon the vote to upgrade Palestinian status to a non-member observer state Nov. 29. Photo: UN Photo/Rick Bajornas.
In the ongoing “battle of the narratives” between Israel and the Palestinians, one minor, but telling, detail rarely gets mentioned: the Arabic alphabet, the abjad, lacks the letter “P.” Until the “P”alestinians, no people in history had ever adopted a name for themselves, or for their country, that cannot be written in their own language. By itself, this detail establishes that the “P”alestinian national narrative is a wholly modern invention.
In Arabic, the “P”alestinians call their country “Filastin” and themselves “Filastiniyun,” but this doesn’t validate their narrative; in fact, it underscores the simple truth about “P”alestine that the world ignores.
There are four issues:
1) The “P”alestinians claim to be part of the Arab people, but the historical Philistines, from whom “Filastin” is presumably taken, came from the Aegean world and were Hellenic, rather than any form of Semites.
2) The archaeological record establishes that the Philistines arrived in Canaan around 100-150 years after the Israelites, and thus even if the “P”alestinians could prove a connection, that would provide no prior claim to controlling territory.
3) The Philisitines conquered only the southwest coast of Canaan, an area corresponding roughly to today’s Gaza Strip, and did not settle the central highland. Thus, even if the “P”alestinians could connect themselves to the Philistines, that would give them no claim much beyond Gaza.
4) The last identifiable vestiges of Philistine culture disappeared about 2600 years ago. It is possible they were incorporated into, or became, the Tribe of Dan (a Hellenic tribe known as the Danae disappeared from the south coast of Turkey just before the Philisitines arrived in Canaan), and became part of the Israelites. DNA would provide no help here; 2600 years is roughly 100 generations, which is more than enough for everyone on the planet to have some Philistine DNA.
The name “Palestine” was given to the Land of Israel, more properly Judaea, by the Roman emperor Hadrian in 135 CE specifically to cut its tie to the Judaeans, who would come to be known as Jews. The name is imperialist in origin, which is ironic because the “P”alestinians allege that the Jewish presence is inherently imperialistic. Christians continued to use this name over the centuries, so it was natural that the British would call their mandate “Palestine.”
As readers of these pages are undoubtedly aware, the name “Palestinian” referred to the Jewish inhabitants of the Palestine Mandate from its inception in 1923 until the establishment of Israel. During the Mandate, no Arab would call himself a “Palestinian,” rather they were simply the Arabs of Palestine.
So why call themselves “P”alestinians now? The probable answer is that they have no prior name for themselves, a tip-off that they are a new people, and the name is useful for propaganda purposes. What could be more natural than for a people called “P”alestinians to be the rightful owners of a land called “P”alestine? Except, of course, that their language can’t provide either name and we can see their narrative was created for Western consumption.
Cornell University Student Outed Over Antisemitism Reveals Interest in Holocaust Denial, Eugenics in Shocking Secret Footage
2025 Becomes Deadliest Year for Jews Outside Israel in More Than Three Decades, New Report Finds
Netherlands Moves to Ban Settlement Goods as European Pressure on Israel Intensifies
Pro-Israel Hochul Challenger Bruce Blakeman Narrows Lead, According to New Poll
Israeli Students Extend Global Medal Streak With Math Olympiad Gold
LA County Supervisor Proposes $20K Reward After Antisemitic Vandalism of Pasadena Synagogue
Haftarah Parshat Ekev: The Many Dimensions of Love
Forty-four Percent of American Muslims View Hamas Favorably; Our Response Must Be Dialogue, Not Despair
How Journalists Omit Facts and Context to Skew the Narrative on Gaza Ceasefire
The Houthis Are Hitting Saudi Arabia’s Energy Pipeline — and Here’s Why That Matters





Mamdani Again Under Fire For Excluding Jews From Judicial Advisory Committee
Armed Man Attacks Jewish Day Camp in Queens
Five Countries Announce Departure from International Criminal Court On Heels of US Promise to ‘Dismantle’ Tribunal
Pro-Palestinian Activists Found Guilty for Targeting Picasso Painting With Gaza Picture at London’s National Gallery
Forty-four Percent of American Muslims View Hamas Favorably; Our Response Must Be Dialogue, Not Despair



