Wednesday, July 15th | 1 Av 5786

Subscribe

Hakeem Jeffries Announces He Will Not House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) has come out against a bid to cut off US military aid to Israel, while calling for a “major reset” of Washington’s relationship with the Jewish state. In a “Dear Colleague” letter to fellow Democrats on Tuesday, Jeffries said he would vote against an amendment led by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), and co-sponsored by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), that would strip roughly $3.3 billion in annual military financing for Israel — while preserving $500 million for missile-defense programs such as Iron Dome — from the fiscal 2027 National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act. The House could vote on the measure as early as this week. Aligning himself with the ranking Democrats on the Appropriations and Foreign Affairs committees, Reps. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) and Gregory Meeks (D-NY), as well as the advocacy group J Street, Jeffries called the proposal too sweeping. “As written, it is overly broad in that it prohibits or would limit the use of funds for longstanding initiatives related to humanitarian aid, refugee resettlement, peace-building and US Embassy operations,” he wrote, adding that the “so-called Massie amendment” would restrict US efforts to confront Hamas, Hezbollah “and other terrorist organizations in the region who are sworn enemies of both the United States and Israel.” Citing deep divisions within the party over Israel, Jeffries said leadership would not pressure members to follow his lead. “There are good faith reasons that will result in Members voting in a variety of different ways with respect to the amendment,” he wrote, noting that the caucus was not whipping the vote. At the same time, Jeffries argued that US policy toward the region “must change,” tying his call for a “major reset” to criticism of what he termed the “far-right Netanyahu government.” He wrote that America’s commitment to “Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state and homeland for the Jewish people must remain ironclad,” while urging strong US support for the creation of an independent Palestinian state. Israeli governments have long rejected the establishment of a Palestinian state along Israel’s borders, warning that it would pose an existential security threat and leave major population centers exposed to attack. Jeffries also said Gaza must undergo “complete reconstruction and modernization” and that “Hamas must be disarmed and removed from power.” Jeffries further signaled that the next US-Israel aid agreement should require Israel to cover more of its own defense costs. The current 10-year memorandum of understanding, signed under President Barack Obama in 2016, provides Israel about $3.8 billion annually — $3.3 billion in military financing and $500 million for missile defense — and expires in 2028. “Israel has an advanced economy and is capable of paying for its own sophisticated weapons, as the Prime Minister recently acknowledged,” Jeffries wrote, adding that any future arrangement should mirror US defense agreements with other Western allies and “strictly adhere to our human rights laws and values.” His stance placed him between the two poles of a party increasingly split over Israel. Hours after his letter circulated, the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX), sent a competing letter urging Democrats to back the Massie amendment, and progressives including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said they would vote to cut the aid. Support for Israel among Democratic voters has fallen sharply during the war in Gaza. An Associated Press-NORC poll conducted in June found that 52 percent of Democrats say Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians, while a Pew Research Center survey found that roughly 80 percent of Democrats hold a negative view of Israel. In April, a majority of Senate Democrats — 40 of the caucus’s 47 members — voted for at least one of two resolutions to block certain arms sales to Israel, though the measures failed. Supporters of continued assistance say it preserves Israel’s qualitative military edge and bolsters a key US partner against Iran-backed groups, while critics want aid conditioned on Israeli policy changes, particularly over the conduct of the war in Gaza. The upcoming vote is expected to underscore the widening gap between the party’s pro-Israel wing and its growing bloc of aid critics. for Amendment to Strip Israel Aid

April 24, 2019 1:08 pm

In New York Speech, Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif Backs IRGC, Accuses Trump of Falling for Israeli-Led ‘Plot’

×

Error: Contact form not found.

avatar by Ben Cohen

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif speaking at the Asia Society in New York City, April 24, 2019. Photo: Screenshot.

Iran’s foreign minister bluntly told an invited audience in New York City on Wednesday that the US must recognize the authority of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) if it wanted to navigate the Strait of Hormuz — the strategically-vital sea passage that connects the Persian Gulf with the Arabian Sea.

During an appearance at the Asia Society in Manhattan, Mohammad Javad Zarif was questioned as to whether the Tehran regime might close off the Strait of Hormuz —  through which approximately 35 percent of the world’s oil supply is carried — to international shipping.

“When the US enters the Strait of Hormuz, they have to talk to those who are protecting the Strait of Hormuz — and that is the [Islamic] Revolutionary Guard Corps,” Zarif answered.

The IRGC was designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the Trump administration on earlier this month — marking the first time that the US has formally labeled another country’s military a terrorist group. In a statement announcing the decision, President Donald Trump described the IRGC as  “the Iranian government’s primary means of directing and implementing its global terrorist campaign.” Trump then added pointedly, “If you are doing business with the IRGC, you will be bankrolling terrorism.”

Zarif, who was visiting New York for a UN meeting, depicted Iran as the unfortunate victim of aggressive US unilateralism throughout his remarks on Monday, during a session moderated by the Asia Society’s president and CEO, Josette Sheeran.

Yet the Iranian official was surprisingly conciliatory on the subject of Trump himself, insisting that the US leader’s peaceful instincts were being foiled by an international “plot” involving Israel, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and anti-Iran hawks in Washington, DC.

“I call them the ‘B-team,” Zarif quipped several times during his speech. “Bibi, Bolton, bin Zayad, bin Salman.”

According to Zarif, a kitchen cabinet comprising Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu, US National Security Adviser John Bolton, UAE ruler Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayad and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman “wants the US to take crazy measures.”

Zarif said he doubted that Trump would be willing to take military action against the Islamic Republic.

“He ran on a campaign promise not to waste another $7 trillion on [war in] our region, and he seems careful to implement his campaign promises,” he said. The true problem lay in “plan B of the ‘B-team,’ because they have a different plan from Trump.”

Zarif went on to assert that Trump was being “lured into a plot” by an anti-Iran coalition.

“It’s not a plan, it’s a plot,” he stressed. “And it will cost another $7 trillion.”

Elaborating, he argued that the key difference in US policy was that “Trump wants to bring us to our knees in order to talk, and the ‘B-team’ wants regime change, they want the disintegration of Iran.”

Later on in his speech, Zarif said Iran took full credit for the military defeats inflicted upon the Islamist terrorist group ISIS in Iraq and Syria.

“We are in forefront of fighting terrorism,” he claimed, saying that Iran had been “the only country fighting Da’esh (ISIS)” alongside Iraqi and Syrian ground forces.

Sheeran did not challenge her guest on this point, and no broader discussion ensued concerning the Iranian regime’s support for the Lebanese terrorist group Hezbollah, Iran’s role in crushing the independence bid of Iraqi Kurdistan overwhelmingly supported by a Sept. 2017 referendum, Iran’s attempt to control a land corridor stretching to Israel’s northern border or similar issues.

Zarif was, however, adamant that Iran would continue to export oil to the international market, despite the US announcement on Monday that it would not renew waivers for eight countries to continue purchasing Iranian oil.

“We will continue to find buyers for our oil and we will continue to use the Strait of Hormuz as a safe transit passage for the sale of our oil,” Zarif said.

“If the United States takes the crazy measure of trying to prevent us from doing that, then it should be prepared for the consequences,” he emphasized, without giving specifics.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Email a copy of to a friend
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.