Demonstrators form a human chain during ongoing anti-government protests in Beirut, Lebanon, October 27, 2019. Photo: REUTERS/Alkis Konstantinidis.

JNS.org – Saturday saw another day of mass protests in Lebanon. The government’s promises to implement economic reforms and rescind taxes, alongside threats by Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah that his organization won’t sit idly by if the demonstrations continue, didn’t stop Lebanon’s youth from flooding the streets and keeping the country paralyzed.

The fact that the protests lack a guiding hand, or any discernible leadership — not to mention any defined goals aside from vague slogans calling for “change to the system in Lebanon” — is making it hard to see the light at the end of the tunnel. It’s also safe to assume that the bitterness, frustration, and anger harbored by the youth for politics and politicians — the same cohort of corrupt hedonists who have brought Lebanon to the precipice of economic ruin — will continue fueling the protests.

Lebanon is not alone. In Iraq, too, bloody protests have engulfed the country in recent days, also spearheaded by restless, hopeless youth. While it is encouraging to see that the younger generation of Arabs refuse to continue accepting a reality of failure and backwardness, sadly, these protests won’t catalyze any real change.

Indeed, for these Iraqi youths, as with those in Lebanon, there is something stronger than enmity and rage — their sense of loyalty to family, tribe, and ethnic group, coupled with fears of rival ethnic groups. Consequently, these youngsters repeatedly revert to backing the same types of leaders who have managed Lebanon’s politics for hundreds of years.

Thus, even if Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri’s government steps down, it will only be replaced by a similar coalition comprising the same corrupt dignitaries who prioritize their own well-being over that of the country.

It is interesting to note that the demonstrations in Lebanon and Iraq, beyond disquieting the corrupt politicians in both countries, have more importantly thrown Iran — and mainly Nasrallah — off balance, even to the point of alarm.

When Hezbollah was created, it labeled itself the “Organization of the Oppressed on Earth.” But the organization forgot a long time ago about the oppressed on whose behalf it purported to speak. Hezbollah has been part of the Lebanese government for more than 15 years already, and thus cannot shirk its responsibility for the current crisis.

The organization controls a sprawling apparatus of companies and social institutions, which have become corrupt and contemptible. Moreover, Hezbollah needs Lebanon to be stable in order to continue suckling at its teat.

The protests in Lebanon and Iraq are inconvenient from Iran’s perspective. Supposedly, this is Tehran’s finest hour, its bold moves now having paid off. Its aggression in the Persian Gulf has been met with forgiveness and even attempts at appeasement. Washington is pulling its troops from Syria and abandoning the arena to Iran, and isn’t hiding its desire for dialogue with the Iranians.

The sense of victory in Tehran spurred IDF chief Aviv Kochavi to warn of a possible conflagration on Israel’s borders. No one wants all-out war, but, in the words of Kochavi, Israel and Iran are on a collision course and there is no one out there to deter or stop the Iranians.

The protests, then, are an uncomfortable wrench in Iran and Hezbollah’s plans. But we can assume, regretfully, that the protests will end with a thud and the axis of evil will continue on its path to the next objective.

Eyal Zisser is a lecturer in the Middle East History Department at Tel Aviv University. A version of this article first appeared in Israel Hayom.