One of the campus buildings at the University of California, Berkeley. Photo: Max Pixel/Creative Commons.

On November 21, the Palestine, Arab, and Muslim Caucus of the California Faculty Association, a union organized to platform pro-Palestinian voices, hosted a webinar titled “On Weaponizing Antisemitism.”

Rather than attempting to protect all students, the goal of the event was clearly to accuse pro-Israel and Jewish advocacy organizations of dishonestly using the widely embraced International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA)’s working definition of antisemitism to silence pro-Palestinian voices. They defended their claim by highlighting an observed rise in US Islamophobia since the October 7th massacre.

Despite this, the panelists ignored the major surge in antisemitic incidents in the US since Hamas’ massacre. Throughout the event, they refused to unequivocally condemn Hamas’ heinous attacks. They even went as far as denying the Jewish connection to the land of Israel, while expressing antisemitic conspiracies about Jewish power in America.

The moderator, associate professor Sang Hea Kil of San Jose State University’s Justice Studies department, held Israel entirely responsible for the current situation in the Gaza Strip, stating that “the Israeli regime is capitalizing on the October 7th military incursion to create another ‘Nakba,’ by forcing 1.1 million Gazans to forcibly leave their land, while simultaneously bombing them and preventing their escape to safe passage.” However, this cannot be farther from the truth. Israel ordered the evacuation of the civilian population of Gaza City, in accordance with the rule of law. Furthermore, it was Hamas who had been preventing the civilian population from evacuating towards the designated safe zones. Even after the civilians had successfully evacuated, this didn’t stop Hamas from using these safe zones to attack Israeli civilians.

Ironically in Sang Hea Kil’s anti-Zionist diatribe, she highlighted the importance of the anthropological relationship between people and their land, narrow-mindedly comparing the Palestinians to the  Native American tribes who lived near her college. For seemingly arbitrary reasons, she denied all evidence proving the analogous connections that Jews have to Israel. As she should know, the contiguous Jewish presence in the disputed territories existed long before the Islamic conquests that brought Arab culture and society to the region.

Later, in an attempt to frame the ongoing war in Gaza, she mentioned “the bombing of hospitals, schools, and UN shelters” as an example of the ongoing “Israeli aggression,” which she claimed is in direct violation of the Geneva Conventions. She completely ignored the exception outlined in the same document allowing the targeting of such buildings if they are being used militarily, which is exactly what Hamas has been doing for decades. She also called Israel an apartheid state, which has continuously been proven to be a lie.

Judith Butler, a UC Berkeley professor of Philosophy and Gender Studies, argued that although antisemitism exists and needs to be combated, “we must [fight antisemitism] in an international framework that allows all of the forms of hatred to be understood in relationship to each other.” In other words, to properly address any form of hate crimes, people must take into consideration all forms of hate. An example she gave was the recent marches against antisemitism in France, which she claimed are counterproductive because they only address antisemitism.

Since she sweepingly declared that all accusations of Palestinian antisemitism contribute to anti-Palestinian prejudice (which apparently is a subset of Islamophobia), such accusations are by definition illegitimate. This is how she justifies her rejection of the IHRA definition of antisemitism because of her false belief that it grants immunity to Israel.

Hypocritically, while criticizing protests against antisemitism for not including Islamophobia, she ignored the severe degree of antisemitism in Islamic or Palestinian societies, especially the extreme level of support the Palestinians displayed for the October 7th massacre or the rampant antisemitism ingrained in Pro-Palestinian activism.

Not only are the opinions espoused by the webinar morally bankrupt and devoid of reality, but they contribute to an anti-Israel atmosphere on campus and around the world, which could lead to even more violence against Jews and Israelis.