Pakistan’s Frightening Blasphemy, Apostasy Laws

June 3, 2014 11:38 am 3 comments

Taliban members in Pakistan. Photo: Screenshot.

The trending story of late is about a woman accused of blasphemy in Sudan.

The court convicted Meriam Yehya Ibrahim, 27, of apostasy, or the renunciation of faith. Ibrahim is Christian, her husband said. But the court considers her to be Muslim because she married a Muslim man.

Under Sudan’s sharia law, Ibrahim was also convicted of adultery and sentenced to 100 lashes because her marriage to a Christian man is considered void.

Sudan is not the only place where blasphemy laws are creating havoc.

My own land of birth Pakistan is reeling from an onslaught of blasphemy-related incidents. Under the banner of this inhuman law, an estimated 1,000 people have been charged since 1987. The Center for Research and Security Studies, based in Islamabad, shows that there were 80 blasphemy complaints in 2011. There are no statistics after that, but analysts believe that 2014 may be a record year.

Individual blasphemy cases filed against the minority Ahmadi and Christian communities are common knowledge, but now there is a trend to apply the blasphemy law towards anyone the establishment does not agree with. The punishment for blasphemy is death.

Last week, Pakistani police detained 68 lawyers who participated in a public protest, criticizing the arrest of a colleague. The irony is that while the lawyers were within their rights to protest, the police officer they were protesting against happened to be named Umar Daraz. Hence, when protesters chanted “Umar,” this was deliberately misconstrued as being against Umar, one the companions of the Prophet Mohammad.

In another sickeningly horrifying incident, a mother who called her son, Mohammad, a devil for misbehaving was also charged with blasphemy against the Prophet. And so it goes. Almost anyone on the street can be charged at any time, any place, and for any offense.

Pakistan is a mostly Sunni Muslim country, but about a fifth of its people are Shia Muslims, who have been targeted in recent violence. According to one unverified report, a Shia has been shot in killed in Pakistan every single day in 2014. All it takes is for some mad mullah to declare a person or community non-Muslim, and the attacks begin. As a result, any person can slam an accusation of apostasy or blasphemy on his or her neighbor, friend, or fellow citizen with impunity. The arrest comes first and then explanations are given. Blasphemy accusations are commonly used to settle personal vendettas but there is no accountability.

There have been attempts by some brave activists to abolish the blasphemy law but to no avail, because they have been threatened and rudely shut up. In Pakistan, a death-threat is not benign as we saw from the sad saga of Governor of Punjab, Salman Taseer who’s murderer was celebrated. Sadly, ordinary Pakistanis don’t want to speak up because of the backlash that usually falls onto anyone who brings up the horrifying ways in which the current situation in Pakistan is playing out.

The blasphemy law’s history dates back to British colonizers of the sub-continent who made it a criminal offence to commit “deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of ANY [emphasis mine] class by insulting its religious belief.” They intended to protect the diverse faith groups that lived in pre-partition India. The law was retained after partition, but in his presidential address to the constituent Assembly of Pakistan on August 11, 1947, Pakistan’s founder Quaid e Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah said “what are we fighting for? What are we aiming at? It is not theocracy – not for a theocratic state. You are free to go to your temples; you are free to go to your mosques or any other place of worship in this state of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed – that has nothing to do with the business of the state….”

In the 1970s, Pakistan’s Islamist military leader General Zia ul-Haq made several additions to the blasphemy law, including life imprisonment for those defiling or desecrating the Quran or the Prophet. In 1986, the death penalty was introduced for anyone found guilty of defaming Islam.

If one were to ask the ordinary Pakistani in the street or in rural areas where blasphemy cases are common, if they know what the blasphemy law means, they will usually answer that they believe it is part of the Qur’an. In their minds, they are following Islam in implementing and supporting this horrific law.

However, the concepts of blasphemy and apostasy are definitely not supported by the Qur’an, which clearly indicates “there is no compulsion in religion.” The historical connection of blasphemy and Islam is post-Mohammad. After Mohammad’s demise, some tribes who had paid allegiance to him and accepted Islam reneged, and said that their contract was with Mohammad. Now that Mohammad was no longer alive, some of them wanted to revoke their membership in the ‘Muslim’ club and not offer the same allegiance to the current ruler. The ruling religious leadership got terrified that they would lose power, people, and money so they implemented a law (yes the blasphemy law) stating that turning back from Islam would make them liable for death, so they had no choice but to stay. Later, blasphemy laws morphed into something even more sinister and complicated as it is practiced today.

The blasphemy law is contrary to every aspect of universal human rights. Blasphemy laws are in violation of Articles 2, 3, and 4 of the UN Declaration on the Elimination of all Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion and Belief and also violates articles 2 and 4 of the Declaration of the Rights of Persons Belonging to National, Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities.

Ironically, the blasphemy law has been used in Pakistan as a systematic tool of discrimination and abuse against religious minorities, and for ethnic cleansing. Although religious minorities form only 3 percent of Pakistan’s population of almost 167 million, nearly half the victims were Ahmadis, the others Christians and Hindus and today the Shias. The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief observed that the punishments accompanying blasphemy laws are excessive and disproportionate to the offenses.

The text of the blasphemy law is religion specific and very discriminatory. It makes no distinction between deliberate action and unintended mistakes in its application, and has been used indiscriminately to settle personal vendettas.

Pakistan has been front and center in the global arena in pressing limitations on freedom of religion and freedom of expression. In March 2009, Pakistan presented a resolution to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva calling upon the world to formulate laws against the defamation of religion.

Unless world powers and those countries who give huge amounts of aid to Pakistan start sanctions, the situation is not going to change. Pakistan needs to be held accountable for protecting its minorities and for revoking the blasphemy law as soon as possible.

Raheel Raza is president of The Council for Muslims Facing Tomorrow, and a human rights activist based in Toronto, Canada.

Editor’s note: A group called Human Rights For Atheists, Agnostics and Secularists is sponsoring a petition calling on the United Nations to abolish blasphemy laws by adding “the non-religious as an expressly protected group” to its charter and the Statute of the International Court of Justice. To learn more, click here.

3 Comments

  • The author of this article is mistaken. The idea of apostasy and blasphemy is not post-Prophetic. The author should have a better education of the context and the chronological order of events during the life of the Prophet (S), from which the Shariah is derived.

    As the Prophet (peace be upon him) said:
    “It is not permissible to shed the blood of a Muslim except in three cases: An adulterer who had been married, who should be stoned to death; a man who killed another man intentionally, who should be killed; and a man who left Islam and waged war against Allah, the Might and Sublime, and His Messenger, who should be killed, or crucified, or banished from the land.” [Nasai Vol. 5, Book 1, Hadith 4053]

    And the Shariah of Islam is derived both from the book that God revealed and the man He sent as its vehicle, teacher, and Messenger (peace be upon him).

    So if blasphemy/apostasy law exists in Shariah, does this mean that Islam is barbaric?

    No. (Note that the Hadith specifies those who leave Islam and *wage war against it* – in other words, people who make their apostasy a political issue).

    There are three issues here:
    1. The hand of the media in blowing issues out of proportion and making rarely-implemented laws – which are abused in Muslim countries that *do not* correctly follow Shariah – appear to be some sort of fundamental cornerstone of Islamic legislation.
    2. There is a lot of CONTEXT to the apostasy issue in Islam, as applied in a state *correctly and comprehensively* applying Shariah. For honest, open-minded people who would like to be educated on the context and to be able to see the idea of apostasy and blasphemy from a *different* perspective, please enter the following in Google search: “miraatu of_apostasy_blasphemy_and_islam.pdf” and read the document that shows up.
    3. There is another, INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT context that is very often missed out in the “blasphemy/apostasy in Islam” discourse. And that is the “Extremely frightening laws against blasphemy and apostasy” in the same Western and so-called “free” states that present their criticism against Islam. The West may do not use the word “blasphemy” but it effectively treats any anti-establishment discussion as blasphemy. For example, please google this: “huffington post journalist or terrorist”. And this is just one recent article, only discussing life imprisonment. There is no dearth of documented evidence of state-sponsored assassinations against those whom the West conceives as a threat. Just because they do not openly claim such laws does not mean they do not actively engage in them. Do keep in mind that Gitmo and the worst torture cells in the world, where people are held *without criminal charges*, mainly for indulging in the “possibility” of what is blasphemous to Western ideology, remember that is a product of Western society, not Islam.

  • ” The historical connection of blasphemy and Islam is post-Mohammad. After Mohammad’s demise, some tribes who had paid allegiance to him and accepted Islam reneged, and said that their contract was with Mohammad. Now that Mohammad was no longer alive, some of them wanted to revoke their membership in the ‘Muslim’ club and not offer the same allegiance to the current ruler. The ruling religious leadership got terrified that they would lose power, people, and money so they implemented a law (yes the blasphemy law) stating that turning back from Islam would make them liable for death, so they had no choice but to stay. Later, blasphemy laws morphed into something even more sinister and complicated as it is practiced today.”
    Interesting! I think the main reason was the tribes refusing to pay zakat tax and that was rebellion and treated like rebellion, with force.
    Also, indeed there are no injunctions in the Quran dealing with apostasy. All that is said for an apostate is that such a person will go to hell. This leads me to conclude that death for apostasy goes against the grain of Islam because when you kill someone for apostasy you take away from the apostate the facility to repent. (The promise of hell is to make the person think again and give him/her a chance to repent.)Of course the Prophet (SAW) never punished anyone with death for apostasy.

  • Keith Kevelson

    It’s good to see more people speaking up on this issue, especially Muslims. All too often, individuals who have called for inclusion of these facts in school curricula, or who have called for sanctions against nations that pursue such tyrannical theocracy, have been accused of “hate speech” or “inciting hatred.” Also, corporate lobbyists, mainly in resource-rich nations, have been trying to mask the persecution religious-dissenters face on a daily basis to secure contracts. However, if enough people coordinate their efforts, these laws will surely fall.

    One would hope that the British would kick Pakistan out of the Commonwealth of Nations for this, especially considering its vicious persecution of the Ahmaddi. It’s a struggle just to get the US to stop sending military aid to Pakistan though.

Leave a Reply

Please note: comments may be published in the Algemeiner print edition.


Current day month ye@r *

More...

  • Book Reviews Commentary In ‘America in Retreat,’ a Real-Life Risk Board

    In ‘America in Retreat,’ a Real-Life Risk Board

    JNS.org – “Risk: The Game of Strategic Conquest,” the classic Parker Brothers board game, requires imperial ambitions. Players imagine empires and are pitted against each other, vying for world domination. Amid this fictional world war, beginners learn fast that no matter the superiority of their army, every advance is a gamble determined by a roll of the dice. After a defeat, a player must retreat. Weighted reinforcement cards provide the only opportunity to reverse a player’s fortunes and resume the [...]

    Read more →
  • Beliefs and concepts Sports Does Working Out With Other Jews Keep You Jewish?

    Does Working Out With Other Jews Keep You Jewish?

    JNS.org – For Daphna Krupp, her daily workout (excluding Shabbat) at the Jewish Community Center (JCC or “J”) of Greater Baltimore has become somewhat of a ritual. She not only attends fitness classes but also engages with the instructors and plugs the J’s social programs on her personal Facebook page. “It’s the gym and the environment,” says Krupp. “It’s a great social network.” Krupp, who lives in Pikesville, Md., is one of an estimated 1 million American Jewish members of more [...]

    Read more →
  • Sports US & Canada Sports Illustrated Profiles Orthodox NCAA Basketball Player Aaron Liberman

    Sports Illustrated Profiles Orthodox NCAA Basketball Player Aaron Liberman

    Sports Illustrated magazine featured an extensive profile on Orthodox-Jewish college basketball player Aaron Liberman on Wednesday.  The article details Liberman’s efforts to balance faith, academics and basketball at Tulane University, a challenge the young athlete calls “a triple major.” Sports Illustrated pointed out that Liberman is the second Orthodox student to play Division I college basketball. The other was Tamir Goodman, the so-called “Jewish Jordan.” As reported in The Algemeiner, Liberman started his NCAA career at Northwestern University. According to [...]

    Read more →
  • Jewish Identity Sports Cycling the Desert: New Israel Bike Trail Connects Mitzpe Ramon to Eilat

    Cycling the Desert: New Israel Bike Trail Connects Mitzpe Ramon to Eilat

    As the popularity of cycling continues to increase across the world, Israel is working to develop cycling trails that make the country’s spectacular desert accessible to cyclists. The southern segment of the Israel Bike Trail was inaugurated on Feb. 24 and offers for the first time a unique, uninterrupted 8-day cycling experience after six years of planning and development. The southern section of the Israel Bike Trail stretches over 300 kilometers in length and is divided into eight segments for mountain biking, [...]

    Read more →
  • Jewish Identity Theater Forthcoming Major Action Movies Inspired by Jewish Comic Artist Jack Kirby

    Forthcoming Major Action Movies Inspired by Jewish Comic Artist Jack Kirby

    JNS.org – With the recent Oscars in the rearview mirror, Hollywood’s attention now shifts to the rest of this year’s big-screen lineup. Two of the major action films coming up in 2015—Avengers: Age of Ultron, which hits theaters in May, and the third film in the Fantastic Four series, slated for an August release—have Jewish roots that the average moviegoer might be unaware of. As it turns out, it took a tough Jewish kid from New York City’s Lower East [...]

    Read more →
  • Book Reviews Jewish Identity When Torah Teaches Life and Life Teaches Torah (REVIEW)

    When Torah Teaches Life and Life Teaches Torah (REVIEW)

    JNS.org – Rabbi Gordon Tucker spent the first 20 years of his career teaching at the Conservative movement’s Jewish Theological Seminary (JTS) and the next 20 years as the rabbi of Temple Israel Center in White Plains, N.Y. I confess that when I heard about the order of those events, I thought that Tucker’s move from academia to the pulpit was strange. Firstly, I could not imagine anyone filling the place of my friend, Arnold Turetsky, who was such a talented [...]

    Read more →
  • Arts and Culture Blogs Oscars 2015: Reflecting on Love at First Sight

    Oscars 2015: Reflecting on Love at First Sight

    JNS.org – I’m in love, and have been for a long time. It’s a relationship filled with laughter, tears, intrigue, and surprise. It was love at first sight, back when I was a little girl—with an extra-terrestrial that longed to go home. From then on, that love has never wavered, and isn’t reserved for one, but for oh so many—Ferris Bueller, Annie Hall, Tootsie, Harry and Sally, Marty McFly, Atticus Finch, Danny Zuko, Yentl, that little dog Toto, Mrs. Doubtfire, [...]

    Read more →
  • Blogs Book Reviews Examining America’s First Foray into the Middle East (REVIEW)

    Examining America’s First Foray into the Middle East (REVIEW)

    At the turn of the 21st century through today, American involvement in Middle Eastern politics runs through the Central Intelligence Agency. In America’s Great Game: The CIA’s Secret Arabists and the Shaping of the Modern Middle East, historian Hugh Wilford shows this has always been the case. Wilford methodically traces the lives and work of the agency’s three most prominent officers in the Middle East: Kermit “Kim” Roosevelt was the grandson of president Theodore Roosevelt, and the first head of [...]

    Read more →



Sign up now to receive our regular news briefs.