Friday, June 22nd | 9 Tammuz 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

April 15, 2015 6:07 pm

Israel Launches Initiative to Have Antisemitism Recognized as an International Crime

avatar by David Daoud

Email a copy of "Israel Launches Initiative to Have Antisemitism Recognized as an International Crime" to a friend

Former Ambassador Alan Baker is launching an initiative to make antisemitism an international crime. PHOTO: Website of Ambassador Alan Baker.

Attorney Alan Baker, Israel’s former ambassador to Canada and a legal adviser to the Foreign Ministry wants antisemitism to be treated as an international crime. In a new Israeli initiative, Baker is proposing that international courts be used to combat global hate crimes against Jews.

Baker has drafted an international convention calling on the “Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Antisemitism.” The Convention, which is drafted in the manner of classical international anti-terrorism treaties and those for other crimes, will allow countries to cooperate and exchange information with others, in order to extradite those suspected of acts that meet the definition of antisemitism, Israel’s NRG reported in Wednesday.

“We need to set down clear rules on what constitutes antisemitism and to set up international codes to prevent it. We expect that the initiative will be thoroughly discussed among all entities and countries that are engaging antisemitism on a global scale,” said Baker.

Explaining the need for the Convention, Baker noted that, “everyone knows to condemn antisemitism, but they are not doing what is necessary in order to fight against it on an international legal level.” He added that, “on the other hand, international courts invite people from around the world to account for various crimes. We think that this is precisely the place to also work decisively and unambiguously against antisemitism.”

The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, where Mr. Baker is now a fellow, intends to release a draft of the Convention, during a series of conferences at the United Nations, to other international organizations, international capitals, and among Jewish communities and organizations around the world.

This will be done in order to encourage countries to support the initiative and to submit a draft of the Convention to the appropriate UN organizations, in order to obtain international approval of the Convention.

Baker said that, “if the world really wants to work against this terrible phenomenon, the time has come to line up behind the measures that are necessary to be employed against it.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Mother Nature


  • Mother Nature

    What are you, a Christian-Identity, neonazi and identity thief?

  • Mother Nature

    It already is, thanks to murderous racists like you.

  • Mother Nature

    Islam adopted its racism against Jews directly from Christianity, a genocidal and idolatrous religion.

  • Mother Nature

    Antisemitism is racism. The term itself is a EUPHEMISM for Judenhassen (Jew hate). The source of this racism is that 100% lying racist screed called the New Testament. “Codified” and adopted in the 4th century by genocidal Rome in order to better oppress and control conquered people in their evil empire: “give unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s” “turn the other cheek.” It is meant to obviate their genocide of the Hebrews in Yehuda, casting Jews in such a light as to ensure endless mass murder and persecution of Jews for as long as their racist screed (the NT) would exist.

  • The Watchman

    Will NEVER HAPPEN, as you can see from the rubbish about “illuminati”, the “Rothschilds” and the “New World Order” being spouted by the Bollock-Brains posing here. Note, NOT A WORD about the creeping Shariah jihad invasion that really does threaten us all. Besides, if you make it “illegal” it merely goes underground and gains a cachet and the usual leftytwat bollockbrained “students”, supporters and usefull idiots who’ll back any marxist, stalinist, terrorist, Islamist or scumbag but only those who are anti freedom/west/America/UK/ Israel.

  • Dave

    Using the term Anti-Semitism is propaganda at it’s worst…Anti-Semitism is actually what the Zionists & the Western Press are practising…ie Anti-Palestinianism… The term should be Anti-Zionism, but that clearly identifies the real enemy too well, so they fudge it all by using the term anti-Semitism instead.

  • Simon Wood

    This is a concept fraught with huge problems…it should not proceed.

    Anti any ethnic/religious/cultural, etc, group is of course to be fully ‘rejected’, but will only ever work by holistic in-depth education about, & integration of ‘the other’, which criminalization of the matter will not really assist, as it then becomes a quasi-taboo subject, & people will tend to avoid the necessary education as it’s not socially easy/acceptable to discuss such a difficult topic.

    This is massively complicated with thousands of years of history that goes right to the heart of the various versions of Judeo-Christian based moral & legal system we have in ‘Western European’ cultures being based on the The Bible, a book initially written by a *tiny* religious sect of Semitic language self-selected ‘chosen people’, who set themselves up from nearly the very beginning as different/special/the other.

    The fact is that The Bible itself, especially the Old Testament/Torah (& Talmud; both Jerusalem & Babylonian), is riddled with profound contradictions, violence & bigotry…mixed with wisdom, compassion & truth…making it a very, very, muddy source book to run a successful culture from.

    Then (so the story goes) Jesus came along, was rejected by his own people as The Messiah, banished & executed horrifically…from which Christianity arose. Thus Christianity as well begins as the origin story of a different type of ‘other’ persecuted by ‘the chosen people’, who’s followers soon found themselves in denial of their prophets origins as a Jew, let alone a Semitic Arab, which ethnically ALL the people of this region are…!!!…& that is only scratching atoms off the surface of the mess this religious/ethnic/cultural boondoggle has become…!!

    Perhaps Israel should look much more closely at the root cause of her own violent actions before pointing the finger too much & recall it’s the actions, not the words, that people respond best to.

    Ultimately Jews are biologically the same as everyone else locally, regionally, globally, somewhat intermarried & interbred over the millennia & all us humans, children of Gaia, are simply Earthlings who must all get on together if we are going to be successful in surviving the next few millennia as crew on spaceship Earth…spinning around the 3rd rock from the sun, Sol, a medium sized star, in an average galaxy amongst billions of galaxy’s in an infinite & eternal Universe…

    …and we continue to argue about our bloodlines & states of mind/heart…sad, so very sad…difficult not to despair that this rubbish continues amongst ‘intelligent people’ in this so-called ‘enlightened age’ we are currently living within…

  • How about making it a crime to be a Jew instead?

  • my name is Greg mollar i really want to
    share my
    on how i became an Illuminati
    through my
    friend. i was moving with my
    friend for
    more than 10 years and he have
    getting rich
    everyday and
    even giving me money but he
    never told
    me the
    secret of his success until a day i
    frustrated to let him know that he
    help me also
    that was
    when he open up to me and tell
    me that
    he was a
    member of the Illuminati that he
    been in the court for more than
    10 years
    that his
    riches and
    protection came from this i told
    him to let
    me be into the court but it not an
    task to be a member but i was
    initiated into the
    church of the Illuminati and i was
    in there
    church. after a month of being a
    of Illuminati i got promotion that
    month in my
    working place
    and within a year i was promoted
    thrice in
    working place to the extend of
    being a
    managing Director i never know
    how to
    thank this
    church of
    Illuminati and today am rich as
    my friend
    also, and
    also the one that surprise me
    most was
    that i got an accident with my
    new car and
    the car was
    right off
    but i still survive the accident and
    happen to
    me i really thank you people
    Illuminati. so
    i just want to share to the world
    that this is
    real and it
    have help
    me and work for me so if you
    want to
    become a
    member i can direct you to the
    who will lead you into the court
    of richness
    and you will
    never be
    poor again, know that it only a
    member in
    Illuminati that can initiate you
    into the
    church of illumination you can
    contact him
    today via this
    email they will tell
    you how to
    Email us at
    further information and how to be initiated

  • mr. kendrick

    ILLUMINATI CALL +2348135874121


    The illuminati is also responsible for the influence of the new world order and the transformation of this great world for the better


    Join the fremasonry illuminati today and fullfill all your heart
    desires call +2348135874121

  • Schlomo Shekelberg

    ” The Jew Strikes You As He Screams In Pain ” These murderous animals now want to remove the thought from the goyim, that when they realize who the worlds foremost problem is, they can’t thin about kicking them out of their Nations. ” Kicked out of every Nation on earth > Everyone but jews are the Problem ! GTF.O

  • Anti-semitism is complicated because Jews are primarily a religion based on a Covenant, but also an ethnic group.DNA tests around the world have found that in spite of conversions over the millenia Jews clearly originate in the Middle East. Theories connecting Jews to Berbers and Khazars have long been proven false, although some extreme anti-Semites refuse to accept the proof. Prior to 19th Century Germany, Jews were persecuted and expelled from Christian states because of the deicide charge, that all Jews are forever guilty of the crucifixtion. In the 19th Century, science accepted the theory of evolution, meaning there are inferior and superior races and religions. German racial scientists decided that Jews were an inferior Asiatic race following an inferior religion — and had no place in Christian Europe with its superior Aryan race and superior religion of Love. The EU produced an agreed working definition of anti-Semitism, but anti-Semites simply rejected the definition!

  • Ron

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize. Most of you people should really do some research.

    • Tabitha Korol

      There is an error in one of the comments. To identify your enemy, figure out who you FEAR. You don’t fear Jews…Jews have established a country that creates a better life for everyone, curing illnesses, equality for all, a Jewish land where Christians and Muslims flourish, where entrepreneurial successes are encouraged. You fear the countries that produce terrorists who chop heads, stone their women, chops limbs, damage antiquities, don’t allow churches and synagogues to be built. You fear Muslims… that’s your enemy. If you think otherwise, then you ARE the enemy of western civilization.

      • Glass of juice

        “Jews have established a country that creates a better life for everyone, curing illnesses, equality for all, a Jewish land where Christians and Muslims flourish”

        Good one Schlomo, love the sarcasm.

        It is natural to fear people that commit terrorism and force innocent people from their land, murdering those that refuse. This is why so many people fear israel. If the israelies where doing to my race, the same things they are doing to the Palestinian race, I’d see it as my moral duty to stop them.

        • ‘murdering those that refuse’ to leave Israel. There were 700,000 Arabs who left Israel in 1948. Today there are 4,000,000 Arabs claiming the right to return to Israel. If Israel murdered those that refused to leave where did these 4,000,000 Arabs come from? The more relevant question is what happened to Arabs who left. There are 24 Arab states, and aside from Jordan, which occupies 77% of Mandatory Palestine, the other Arab states have kept their Pal brothers in refugee camps. 800,000 Jews were expelled from Arab countries in 1948 onwards, but no Jews were placed in permanent refugee camps. Israel accepted all Jews who wanted a new life and the UK and France accepted Jews as well. 50+ Muslim states including 24 Arab states, and 67 years on there are still Pals stuck in refugee camps. Whose fault is that? Two million Arabs are Israeli citizens, families that chose to remain in Israel.

  • Oy vey



    • Ross

      109 Locations whence Jews have been Expelled since AD250

      YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .PLACE
      250 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Carthage
      415 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Alexandria
      554 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Diocèse of Clermont (France)
      561 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Diocèse of Uzès (France)
      612 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Visigoth Spain
      642 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Visigoth Empire
      855 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Italy
      876 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Sens
      1012 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Mainz
      1182 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – France
      1182 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Germany
      1276 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Upper Bavaria
      1290 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – England
      1306 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – France
      1322 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – France (again)
      1348 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Switzerland
      1349 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Hielbronn (Germany)
      1349 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Saxony
      1349 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Hungary
      1360 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Hungary
      1370 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Belgium
      1380 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Slovakia
      1388 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Strasbourg
      1394 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Germany
      1394 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – France
      1420 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Lyons
      1421 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Austria
      1424 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Fribourg
      1424 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Zurich
      1424 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Cologne
      1432 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Savoy
      1438 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Mainz
      1439 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Augsburg
      1442 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Netherlands
      1444 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Netherlands
      1446 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Bavaria
      1453 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – France
      1453 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Breslau
      1454 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Wurzburg
      1462 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Mainz
      1483 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Mainz
      1484 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Warsaw
      1485 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Vincenza (Italy)
      1492 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Spain
      1492 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Italy
      1495 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Lithuania
      1496 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Naples
      1496 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Portugal
      1498 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Nuremberg
      1498 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Navarre
      1510 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Brandenberg
      1510 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Prussia
      1514 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Strasbourg
      1515 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Genoa
      1519 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Regensburg
      1533 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Naples
      1541 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Naples
      1542 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Prague & Bohemia
      1550 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Genoa
      1551 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Bavaria
      1555 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Pesaro
      1557 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Prague
      1559 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Austria
      1561 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Prague
      1567 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Wurzburg
      1569 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Papal States
      1571 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Brandenburg
      1582 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Netherlands
      1582 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Hungary
      1593 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Brandenburg, Austria
      1597 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Cremona, Pavia & Lodi
      1614 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Frankfort
      1615 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Worms
      1619 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Kiev
      1648 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Ukraine
      1648 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Poland
      1649 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Hamburg
      1654 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Little Russia (Belarus
      1656 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Lithuania
      1669 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Oran (North Africa)
      1669 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Vienna
      1670 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Vienna
      1712 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Sandomir
      1727 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Russia
      1738 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Wurtemburg
      1740 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Little Russia (Beylorus)
      1744 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Prague, Bohemia
      1744 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Slovakia
      1744 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Livonia
      1745 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Moravia
      1753 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Kovad (Lithuania)
      1761 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Bordeaux
      1772 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Deported to the Pale of Settlement (Poland/Russia)
      1775 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Warsaw
      1789 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Alsace
      1804 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Villages in Russia
      1808 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Villages & Countrysides (Russia)
      1815 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Lbeck & Bremen
      1815 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria
      1820 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Bremen
      1843 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Russian Border Austria & Prussia
      1862 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Areas in the U.S. under General Grant’s Jurisdiction[1]
      1866 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Galatz, Romania
      1880s – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Russia
      1891 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Moscow
      1919 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Bavaria (foreign born Jews)
      1938-45 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Nazi Controlled Areas
      1948 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Arab Countries

      • I would note that almost every place mentioned is Christian, mainly Catholic, where Jews were persecuted for religious reasons. Jews living in non-Christian countries like China, India, Japan and the Islamic world seem almost absent from your list prior to 1948 when the Arab states expelled Jews for political reasons. All you have demonstrated is many centuries of Catholic bigotry.

      • These numerous expulsions of Jews, they prove that Christianity promotes hatred against Jews.


    In 740 A.D. in a land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, known as Khazaria, a land which today is predominantly occupied by Georgia, but also reaches into Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Hungary, and Romania, the modern Jewish race is born. A modern Jewish race that incidentally is not Jewish.

    How can this be, you ask? Well at that time, the Khazarian people felt a vulnerable people as they had Muslims one side of them and Christians the other side of them, and thus constantly feared attack from either side. Furthermore, the Khazarian people were of neither faith and instead practiced idol worship, which made them ripe for invasion by a people who wished to convert them to an established faith.

    The Khazarian King, King Bulan, decided in order to protect themselves against attack, the Khazarian people must convert to one of these faiths, but which one? If they converted to the Muslim faith they would risk attack by the Christians and if they converted to the Christian faith they would risk attack by the Muslims.

    He had an idea. There was another race that he was aware were able to deal with both the Muslims and the Christians either side of him, predominantly in matters of trade. A race which also dealt with Khazarians in the same manner. That race was the Jews. King Bulan decided if he instructed his people to convert to Judaism he could keep both the Muslims and the Christians happy, as they were both already willing to trade with the Jews, so this is what he did.

    King Bulan was right. He would live to see his country unconquered, his people convert to Judaism enthusiastically and adopt the principles of the most holy Jewish book, the Talmud. There are many things the king would not live to see, however.

    He would not live to see his Asiatic race of converts to Judaism, one day represent 90% of all the Jews on the planet, and call themselves Ashkenazi Jews, when in fact they were not Jews, but simply an Asiatic race of people who converted to the Jewish religion, whilst still continuing to speak the Khazarian language of Yiddish, totally different to the language of Hebrew.

    He would not live to see his people turn to the descendants of a man, far more powerful than him, who would be born just over 1,000 years later in Germany, a man named Bauer, who would spawn the Rothschild dynasty.

    He would not live to see this dynasty usurp the wealth of the world through deception and intrigue, which they would finance through the vast riches they accumulate as they usurp the wealth of the world by gaining control of the world’s money supply.

    He would not live to see his people demand a homeland for themselves in Palestine as their birthright, and ensure every Prime Minister there from its inception in 1948 is an Ashkenazi Jew, even though the true homeland of the Ashkenazi Jews, Khazaria, is his kingdom, some 800 miles away.

    And he would not live to see his people fulfil bible prophecy, as the, “Synagogue of Satan.”


    Oliver Cromwell
    Oliver Cromwell
    King Charles I 1628 AD
    King Charles I
    King Edward I
    King Edward I
    Oliver Cromwell obtains backing from the British parliament for the execution of King Charles I on a charge of treason. Afterwards, Cromwell permits the Jews to enter England again, but does not reverse the Edict of Expulsion issued by King Edward I in 1290, which expelled all Jews forever from England and made the provision that any who remained after November 1st 1290, were to be executed.

    Indeed England is not the first country to expel the Jews. Here is a partial list of all the areas from which the Jews have been banished from, sometimes on numerous occasions, over the last thousand years.

    Mainz 1012 Lithuania 1495
    France 1182 Portugal 1496
    Upper Bavaria 1276 Naples 1496
    England 1290 Navarre 1498
    France 1306 Nuremberg 1498
    France 1322 Brandenburg 1510
    Saxony 1349 Prussia 1510
    Hungary 1360 Genoa 1515
    Belgium 1370 Naples 1533
    Slovakia 1380 Italy 1540
    France 1394 Naples 1541
    Austria 1420 Prague 1541
    Lyons 1420 Genoa 1550
    Cologne 1424 Bavaria 1551
    Mainz 1438 Prague 1557
    Augsburg 1438 Papal States 1569
    Upper Bavaria 1442 Hungary 1582
    Netherlands 1444 Hamburg 1649
    Brandenburg 1446 Vienna 1669
    Mainz 1462 Slovakia 1744
    Mainz 1483 Moravia 1744
    Warsaw 1483 Bohemia 1744
    Spain 1492 Moscow 1891
    Italy 1492

    Bernard Lazare
    Bernard Lazare
    In his book, “L’antisémitisme son histoire et ses causes,” published in 1894, noted Jewish author, Bernard Lazare, stated the following with regard to these expulsions of Jews,

    “If this hostility, even aversion, had only been shown towards the Jews at one period and in one country, it would be easy to unravel the limited causes of this anger, but this race has been on the contrary an object of hatred to all the peoples among whom it has established itself. It must be therefore, since the enemies of the Jews belonged to the most diverse races, since they lived in countries very distant from each other, since they were ruled by very different laws, governed by opposite principles, since they had neither the same morals, nor the same customs, since they were animated by unlike dispositions which did not permit them to judge of anything in the same way, it must be therefore that the general cause of anti-Semitism has always resided in Israel itself and not in those who have fought against Israel.”

    Professor Jesse H. Holmes, writing in, “The American Hebrew,” expressed the following similar sentiments,

    “It can hardly be an accident that antagonism directed against the Jews is to be found pretty much everywhere in the world where Jews and non-Jews are associated. And as the Jews are the common element of the situation it would seem probable, on the face of it, that the cause will be found in them, rather than in the widely varying groups which feel this antagonism.”


    Arthur Nelson Field
    Arthur Nelson Field
    A. N. Field, in his book, “All These Things,” published in 1931, explains the situation in England this year, as a result of Cromwell’s decision to ignore the law banning the Jews from entering England, and allowing them back in defiance of the law, only 33 years earlier, as follows,

    “Thirty-three years after Cromwell had let the Jews into Britain a Dutch Prince arrived from Amsterdam surrounded by a whole swarm of Jews from that Jewish financial centre. Driving his royal father-in-law out of the kingdom, he graciously consented to ascend the throne of Britain. A very natural result following on this event was the inauguration of the National Debt by the establishment six years later of the Bank of England for the purpose of lending money to the Crown. Britain had paid her way as she went until the Jew arrived.”


    The deceptively named, “Bank of England,” is founded. It is deceptively named as it gives the impression it is controlled by the Government of England when in fact it is a private institution founded by Jews. In his book, “The Breakdown of Money,” published in 1934, Christopher Hollis explains the formation of the Bank of England, as follows,

    William III
    William III
    William Paterson
    William Paterson
    “In 1694 the Government of William III (who had come in from Holland with the Jews) was in sore straits for money. A company of rich men under the leadership of one William Paterson offered to lend William £1,200,000 at 8 per cent on the condition that, ‘the Governor and Company of the Bank of England,’ as they called themselves, should have the right to issue notes to the full extent of its capital. That is to say, the Bank got the right to collect £1,200,000 in gold and silver and to turn it into £2,400,000 (that is, double it), lending £1,200,000, the gold and silver to the Government, and using the other £1,200,000, the banknotes, themselves.

    Paterson was quite right about it that this privilege which had been given to the Bank was a privilege to make money…In practice they did not keep a cash reserve of nearly two or three hundred thousand pounds. By 1696 (ie. within two years) we find them circulating £1,750,000 worth of notes against a cash reserve of £36,000. That is with a, ‘backing,’ of only about 2 percent of what they issued and drew interest on.”

    The names of the Jewish controllers of the Bank of England are never revealed, but it is clear, as early as this year, through their control of the Bank of England, Jews had control over the British Royal family. However, whilst their identity is protected, they may have wished they picked a more discreet front man, after William Paterson states,

    “The Bank hath benefit of interest on all monies which it creates out of nothing.”

    The fact that Paterson chose to let the cat out of the bag in this manner, may explain why he would go on to die a poor man, outcast by his associates, or maybe this, “shabbez goy,” (a non-Jew who chose to clandestinely represent the interests of Jews), had merely outlived his usefulness to the Jews behind the scenes.


    Following four years of the Bank of England, the Jewish control of the British money supply had come on in leaps and bounds. They had flooded the country with so much money that the Government debt to the Bank had grown from its’ initial £1,250,000, to £16,000,000, in only four years, an increase of 1,280%.

    Why do they do it? Simple, if the money in circulation in a country is £5,000,000, and a central bank is set up and prints another £15,000,000, stage one of the plan, and sends that out into the economy through loans etc, then this will naturally reduce the value of the initial £5,000,000 that was in circulation before the bank was formed. This is because the initial £5,000,000 that was 100% of the economy is now only 25% of the economy. It will also give the bank control of 75% of the money in circulation with the £15,000,000 they sent out into the economy.

    This causes inflation which is simply the reduction in worth of money borne by the common person, due to the economy being flooded with too much money, an economy which the Central Bank are responsible for. As the common person’s money is worth less, he has to go to the bank to get a loan to help run his business etc, and when the Central Bank are satisfied there are enough people with debt out there, the bank will tighten the supply of money by not offering loans. This is stage two of the plan.

    Stage three, is sitting back and waiting for the people in debt to them to go bankrupt, allowing the bank to then seize from them real wealth, businesses and property etc, for pennies on the pound. Inflation never affects a central bank, in fact they are the only group who can benefit from it, as if they are ever short of money they can simply print more.


    Mayer Amschel Bauer
    Mayer Amschel Bauer
    On February 23rd, Mayer Amschel Bauer, an Ashkenazi Jew, is born in Frankfurt, Germany, the son of Moses Amschel Bauer, a money lender and the proprietor of a counting house.

    Moses Amschel Bauer places a red sign above the entrance door to his counting house. This sign is a red hexagram (that geometrically and numerically translates into the number 666), which under Rothschild instruction will end up on the Israeli flag some two centuries later.


    Gutle Schnaper, an Ashkenazi Jew (future wife of Mayer Amschel Bauer), is born to respected merchant, Wolf Salomon Schnaper.


    During this decade Mayer Amschel Bauer works for a bank owned by the Oppenheimers’ in Hanover, Germany. He is highly successful and becomes a junior partner. Whilst working at the bank he becomes acquainted with General von Estorff.

    Following his father’s death, Bauer returns to Frankfurt to take over his father’s business. Bauer recognises the significance of the red hexagram and changes his name from Bauer to Rothschild, after the red hexagram or sign signifying 666 hanging over the entrance door (“Rot,” is German for, “Red,” “Schild,” is German for, “Shield,” or, “Sign”).

    Under his new identity of Mayer Amschel Rothschild, he discovers that General von Estorff is now attached to the court of Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau, one of the richest royal houses in Europe, which gained its’ wealth by the hiring out of Hessian soldiers to foreign countries for vast profits (a practice that continues today in the form of exporting, United Nations’ “peacekeeping,” troops throughout the world).

    He therefore makes the General’s re-acquaintance on the pretext of selling him valuable coins and trinkets at discounted prices. As he plans, Rothschild is subsequently introduced to Prince William himself who is most pleased with the discounted prices he charges for his rare coins and trinkets, and Rothschild offers him a form of commission for any other business the Prince can direct his way.

    Rothschild subsequently becomes close associates with Prince William, and ends up doing business with him and members of the court. He soon discovers that loaning money to governments and royalty is far more profitable than loaning to individuals, as the loans are bigger and they are secured by the nation’s taxes.


    Mayer Amschel Rothschild becomes court agent for Prince William IX of Hesse-Cassel the grandson of George II of England; cousin to George III; nephew to the King of Denmark; and brother-in-law to the King of Sweden. He is subsequently given permission by Prince William to hang a sign on the front of his business premises declaring that he is, “M. A. Rothschild, by appointment court factor to his serene highness, Prince William of Hanau.”


    Mayer Amschel Rothschild draws up plans for the creation of the, “Illuminati,” and entrusts Ashkenazi Jew, Adam Weishaupt, a Crypto-Jew (a Jew who pretends he’s not Jewish) who is outwardly Roman Catholic, with its organization and development. The, “Illuminati,” is to be based upon the teachings of the Talmud, which is in turn, the teachings of Rabbinical Jews. It is to be called the, “Illuminati,” which is a Luciferian term which means, “keepers of the light.”

    On August 29th, Mayer Amschel Rothschild marries Gutle Schnaper.


    On August 20th, Schönche Jeannette Rothschild is born, the first of Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s five daughters. She goes onto marry Benedikt Moses Worms.


    On June 12th, Amschel Mayer Rothschild is born, the first of Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s five sons. He, like all his brothers who follow him, will enter the family business at the age of twelve.


    On September 9th, Salomon Mayer Rothschild is born.


    Adam Weishaupt officially completes his organisation of the, “Illuminati,” on May 1st of this year. The purpose of the, “Illuminati,” is to divide the non-Jews through political, economic, social, and religious means. The plan is for the opposing sides of the goyim (non-Jews) to be armed whilst incidents are to be provided in order for them to fight amongst themselves; destroy national governments; destroy religious institutions; and eventually destroy each other.

    Weishaupt soon infiltrates the Continental Order of Freemasons with this, “Illuminati,” doctrine and establishes lodges of the Grand Orient to be their secret headquarters. This is all under the orders and finance of Mayer Amschel Rothschild and the concept subsequently spreads into Masonic Lodges worldwide to the present day.

    Weishaupt also recruits 2,000 paid followers including the most intelligent men in the field of arts and letters, education, science, finance, and industry. They are instructed to follow the following methods in order to control people:

    Use monetary and sex bribery to obtain control of men already in high places, in the various levels of all governments and other fields of endeavour. Once influential persons have fallen for the lies, deceits, and temptations of the Illuminati they are to be held in bondage by application of political and other forms of blackmail, threats of financial ruin, public exposure, and fiscal harm, even death to themselves and members of their families.
    The faculties of colleges and universities are to cultivate students possessing exceptional mental ability as well as belonging to well-bred families with international leanings, and recommend them for special training in internationalism, or rather the notion that only a one-world government can put an end to recurring wars and strife. Such training is to be provided by granting scholarships to those selected by the, “Illuminati.”
    All influential people trapped into coming under the control of the, “Illuminati,” plus the students who had been specially educated and trained, are to be used as agents and placed behind the scenes of all governments as experts and specialists. This is to ensure they advise the top executives to adopt policies which in the long-run serve the secret plans of the, “Illuminati,” one-world conspiracy and bring about the destruction of the governments and religions they are elected or appointed to serve.
    To obtain absolute-control of the press, at that time the only mass-communications media which distributed information to the public, so that all news and information could be slanted in order to make the masses believe that a one-world government is the only solution to the world’s many and varied problems.

    On September 16th, Nathan Mayer Rothschild is born.


    On July 2nd, Isabella Rothschild is born.


    On August 29th, Babette Rothschild is born.

    Adam Weishaupt issues his order for the French Revolution to be started by Maximilien Robespierre in book form. This book is written by one of Weishaupt’s associates, Xavier Zwack, and sent by courier from Frankfurt to Paris. However en-route there, the courier is struck by lightning, the book detailing this plan discovered by the police, and handed over to the Bavarian authorities.

    As a consequence, the Bavarian government orders the police to raid Weishaupt’s Masonic Lodges of the Grand Orient, and the homes of his most influential associates. Clearly, the Bavarian authorities were convinced that the book that was discovered was a very real threat by a private group of influential people, who planned the use of wars and revolutions to achieve their political ends.


    The Bavarian government outlaw the, “Illuminati,” and close all the Bavarian lodges of the Grand Orient.

    Mayer Amschel Rothschild moves his family home to a five storey house in Frankfurt which he shares with the Schiff family.


    The Bavarian government publish the details of the, “Illuminati,” plot in a document entitled, “The Original Writings of The Order and Sect of The Illuminati.” They then send this document to all the heads of church and state throughout Europe, who sadly ignore their warning.


    On April 24th, Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild is born.


    Due to the European ignorance of the Bavarian government’s warning, the, “Illuminati’s,” plan for a French Revolution succeeds from this year to its’ completion in 1793. This revolution is a central bankers’ dream, as it establishes a new constitution and passes laws that both forbids the Roman Church from levying tithes (taxes) and also removes the Church’s exemption from taxation.


    Mayer Amschel Rothschild states,

    “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.”

    On May 1st, Julie Rothschild is born.


    The Rothschilds’ get, “control of a nation’s money,” through Alexander Hamilton (their agent in George Washington’s cabinet) when they set up a central bank in the United States called the First Bank of the United States. This is established with a 20 year charter.

    Within the first five years of the life of this central bank, the American Government will borrow $8,200,000 from it, and prices in the country will increase by 72%. In relation to this excessive borrowing and inflation, Thomas Jefferson, then Secretary of State goes on to state,

    “I wish it were possible to obtain a single amendment to our constitution taking from the Federal Government their power of borrowing.”

    Henriette (“Jette”) Rothschild is born, who goes on to marry Moses Montefiore. Montefiore will become the President of the Board of Deputies of British Jews from 1835-1874.


    On May 15th, the last of Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s children, Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild is born.


    Amschel Mayer Rothschild marries Eva Hanau.


    John Robison publishes a book entitled, “Proofs of a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments of Europe Carried on in the Secret Meetings of Freemasons, Illuminati and Reading Societies.” In this book, Professor Robison of the University of Edinburgh, one of the leading intellects of his time, who in 1783 was elected general secretary of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, gives details of the whole Rothschild, “Illuminati,” plot.

    He advises how he had been a high degree mason in the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, and had been invited by Adam Weishaupt to Europe, where he was given a revised copy of Weishaupt’s conspiracy. However, although he pretended to go along with it, Professor Robison did not agree with it and therefore published his aforementioned book to expose it. The book included details of the Bavarian government’s investigation into the, “Illuminati,” and the French Revolution.

    That same year on July 19th, David Pappen, President of Harvard University, lectures the graduating class on the influence, “Illuminism,” is having on American politics and religion.

    At the age of twenty-one, Nathan Mayer Rothschild leaves Frankfurt for England, where with a large sum of money given to him by his father, he sets up a banking house in London.


    In France, the Bank of France is set up. Napoleon would soon see that a free France would mean a country free of debt, and he subsequently states,

    “The hand that gives is among the hand that takes. Money has no motherland, financiers are without patriotism and without decency, their sole object is gain.”

    Salomon Mayer Rothschild marries Caroline Stern.


    Napoleon states that it is his,

    “object to remove the house of Hesse-Cassel from ruler-ship and to strike it out of the list of powers.”

    On hearing this, Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau, flees Germany, goes to Denmark and entrusts his fortune, valued at $3,000,000 at that time to Mayer Amschel Rothschild for safekeeping.

    Nathan Mayer Rothschild marries Hannah Barent Cohen, the daughter of a wealthy London merchant.


    President Thomas Jefferson (the third President of the United States from 1801 – 1809), provides one of the first honest insights into the dishonesty and corruptibility of the media when he states,

    “Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.”


    Nathan Mayer Rothschild has his first son, born Lionel Nathan de Rothschild.


    Sir Francis Baring and Abraham Goldsmid die. This leaves Nathan Mayer Rothschild as the remaining major banker in England.

    Salomon Mayer Rothschild goes to Vienna, Austria and sets up the bank, M. von Rothschild und Söhne.


    The charter for the Rothschilds’ Bank of the United States runs out and Congress votes against its renewal. Nathan Mayer Rothschild is not amused and he states,

    “Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war.”

    However the United States stands firm and the charter is not renewed, which causes Nathan Mayer Rothschild to issue another threat, in which he states,

    “Teach those impudent Americans a lesson. Bring them back to colonial status.”


    Backed by Rothschild money, and Nathan Mayer Rothschild’s orders, the British declare war on the United States. The Rothschilds’ plan is to cause the United States to build up such a debt in fighting this war that they have no option but to surrender to the British and allow the charter for the Rothschild owned First Bank of the United States to be renewed. However, as the British are still busy fighting Napoleon, they are unable to mount much of an assault and the war ends in 1814 with America undefeated.

    On September 19th, Mayer Amschel Rothschild dies. In his will he lays out specific laws that the House of Rothschild are to follow:

    All key positions in the family business are only to be held by family members.
    Only male members of the family are allowed to participate in the family business. This included a reported sixth secret bastard son (It is important to note here that Mayer Amschel Rothschild also had five daughters, so today the spread of the Rothschild dynasty without the Rothschild name is far and wide, and Jews believe the mixed offspring of a Jewish mother is solely Jewish).
    The family is to intermarry with its’ first and second cousins to preserve the family fortune (interestingly according to the Jewish Encyclopaedia 1905, of the fifty-eight Rothschild marriages to that date, exactly half, or twenty-nine, had been to first cousins – a practice known today as inbreeding).
    No public inventory of his estate is to be published.
    No legal action is to be taken with regard to the value of the inheritance.
    The eldest son of the eldest son is to become the head of the family (this condition could only be overturned when the majority of the family agreed otherwise).
    Law number six is straightaway put into effect when Nathan Mayer Rothschild is elected his father’s successor as head of the family.

    Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild goes to Paris, France to set up the bank, de Rothschild Frères.

    Nathaniel de Rothschild, the son of Nathan Mayer Rothschild, is born.


    With regard to the $3,000,000 Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau had entrusted to Mayer Amschel Rothschild for safekeeping, the Jewish Encyclopaedia, 1905 edition, Volume 10, page 494, gives the following account of where it ended up,

    “According to legend this money was hidden away in wine casks, and, escaping the search of Napoleon’s soldiers when they entered Frankfurt, was restored intact in the same casks in 1814, when the elector (Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau) returned to the electorate (Germany). The facts are somewhat less romantic, and more businesslike.”

    This last line indicates the money was never returned by Rothschild to Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau. The encyclopaedia goes on to state,

    “Nathan Mayer Rothschild invested this $3,000,000 in, gold from the East India company knowing that it would be needed for Wellington’s peninsula campaign.”

    Furthermore, on the stolen money Nathan made,

    “no less than four profits:

    On the sale of Wellington’s paper which he bought at 50 cents on the dollar and collected at par.
    On the sale of gold to Wellington.
    On its’ repurchase.
    On forwarding it to Portugal.”

    The five Rothschild brothers work to supply gold to both Wellington’s army (through Nathan in England), and Napoleon’s army (through Jacob in France), and begin their policy of funding both sides in wars. The Rothschilds’ love wars because they are massive generators of risk free debt.

    Risk free, because the debts are guaranteed by the government of a country, and therefore the efforts of the population of that country, and furthermore it doesn’t matter which country loses the war because the loans are given on the guarantee that the victor will honour the debts of the vanquished.

    Whilst the Rothschilds’ are funding both sides in this war, they use the banks they have spread out across Europe to give them the opportunity to set up an unrivalled postal service network of secret routes and fast couriers. Relevant post these couriers carry is opened up by these couriers and the details of their contents given to the Rothschilds’ so they are always one step ahead of current events.

    These Rothschild couriers are the only merchants allowed to pass through the English and French blockades and they use this advantage to keep Nathan Mayer Rothschild up to date with how the war is going so he is able to use that intelligence to buy and sell from his position on the stock exchange in accordance with that intelligence.

    One of Rothschild’s couriers, a man named Rothworth, upon learning the British won the Battle of Waterloo, takes off for the Channel and delivers this news to Nathan Mayer Rothschild, a full 24 hours before Wellington’s own courier.

    Nathan Mayer Rothschild subsequently enters the stock exchange and instructs all his workers to start selling consuls (known as bonds today). Due to Rothschild’s reputation for being one step ahead with regard to information, the other traders panic, think the British have lost the war, and start selling frantically.

    As a result the consuls plummet in value, at which point Nathan Mayer Rothschild discreetly instructs his workers to purchase all the consuls they can lay their hands on.

    When the news comes through that the British had actually won the war, the consuls’ rocket up to a level even higher than before the war started, leaving Nathan Mayer Rothschild with a return of approximately twenty to one on his investment. In fact, Nathan Rothschild openly brags that in his seventeen years in England he has increased his initial £20,000 stake given to him by his father, 2500 times to £50,000,000.

    The ownership of these bonds, or consuls, gives the Rothschild family complete control of the British economy, now the undisputed financial centre of the world (following Napolean’s defeat), and forces the British to set up a new Bank of England, under the control of Nathan Mayer Rothschild.

    Interestingly one hundred years later the New York Times would run a story stating that Nathan Mayer Rothschild’s grandson had attempted to secure a court order to suppress publication of a book which had this insider trading story in it. The Rothschild family claimed the story was untrue and libellous, but the court denied the Rothschilds’ request and ordered the family to pay all court costs.

    Back to 1815, this is the year Nathan Mayer Rothschild makes his famous statement,

    “I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.”

    The Rothschilds’ also use their control of the Bank of England to replace the method of shipping gold from country to country and instead use their five banks spread across Europe to set up a system of paper debits and credits, the banking system of today.

    By the end of this century, a period of time that becomes known as the, “Age of the Rothschilds’,” it is estimated that the Rothschild family controls over half the wealth of the world.

    Indeed in a letter to Nathan from Soloman dated February 28th of this year, Soloman states,

    “We are like the mechanism of a watch, each part is essential.”

    However something that did not go as well as the Rothschilds’ would have liked this year is the Congress of Vienna, which started in September, 1814 and concluded in June of this year. The reason for this Congress of Vienna, was for the Rothschilds’ to create a form of world government, using the debt that many European governments owed them as leverage to give them complete political control over much of the civilized world.

    The Congress started well, when the Rothschilds’ managed to get Switzerland declared forever neutral in wars, in order to provide them with a sovereign territory from which to finance both sides in their manufactured debt creating wars. They also had Switzerland’s borders extended to include within its’ territory Valais; Neuchatel; and Geneva. However their ultimate plan for world government fails when Tsar Alexander I of Russia, one of the few great powers who had not succumbed to a Rothschild central bank, refuses to accept world government.

    Enraged by this, Nathan Mayer Rothschild swears that some day he or his descendants will destroy the Tsar Alexander Ist’s entire family and descendants. Unfortunately he would prove to be true to his word when one hundred and two years later Rothschild funded Jewish Bolsheviks would act upon that promise.

    Interestingly, world government fanatic and Ashkenazi Jew, Henry Kissinger, did his doctoral dissertation on the Congress of Vienna.

    On June 19th, Julie Rothschild dies.


    The American Congress pass a bill permitting yet another Rothschild dominated central bank, which gives the Rothschilds’ control of the American money supply again. This is called the Second Bank of the United States and is given a twenty year charter. This of course means the end of the British war against America with the deaths of thousands of British and American soldiers, and the formation of another Rothschild owned central bank.


    Following the French securing massive loans in 1817 in order to help rebuild after their disastrous defeat at Waterloo, Rothschild agents purchase vast amounts of French government bonds causing their value to increase.

    On November 5th they dump the lot on the open market causing their value to plummet and France as a whole to go into a financial panic. The Rothschilds’ then step in to take control of the French money supply, in a similar way to their manipulation of the British stock-market 6 years earlier.

    • Just glancing over your article it is wrong even from the first sentence! DNA studies around the world have found that Jews origiate in the Middle East and have nothing to do with Berbers or Khazars.The fact that Cohanim around the world share a Cohane marker further proves what non-sense your out-of-date theories are. You mention under expulsions of Jews from Catholic countries that Jews were expelled from Italy in 1492. Italy was not a country until almost 400 years later, in 1870. Your article is basd on out-of-date conspiracy theories long ago rejected by serious scholars.

  • Common Sense

    Replace all mentions of “Israel” with “Saudi Arabia”, all mentions of “antisemitism” with “anti-Muslim”, and all mentions of “Jew” with “Muslim”.

    Now re-read the article.

  • David

    There is a direct correlation between attacks against Jews in Europe and elsewhere abroad and Israel’s slaughters, oppression and dispossession of Palestinians and other Arabs.

    To state the obvious, the best way to end this linkage is for Jews around the world to organize and demand that Israel NOT be referred to as the “Jewish State.”

    BTW, in fact Israel is not a “state,” i.e., it has not yet officially declared its borders and had them accepted as such by the international community.

    • Under international Law, according to Sir Winston Churchill regarding Israel, a state can be recognised even if the borders are not finalised. See Sir Martin Gilbert, ‘Churchill and The Jews’, (Simon and Schuster, 2007)

  • David

    April 19, 2015

    “UK Green Party nominee calls Israel ‘racist and apartheid'”

    “Britain’s Green Party parliamentary candidate Tanya Williams has come under attack by pro-Israel political groups in the UK after describing the Israeli regime as ‘a racist and apartheid state’.

    ” ‘It needs to be pointed out that they [Israel] are a racist state and an apartheid state,’ said William, who represents Twickenham area in southwest London, SW Londoner reported on Saturday.”

  • David

    Reality for Palestinians and others under Zionist rule:

    “Occupation is Slavery”
    By renowned Jewish Israeli journalist Bradley Burston
    “In the name of occupation, generation after generation of Palestinians have been treated as property. They can be moved at will, shackled at will, tortured at will, have their families separated at will. They can be denied the right to vote, to own property, to meet or speak to family and friends. They can be hounded or even shot dead by their masters, who claim their position by biblical right, and also use them to build and work on the plantations the toilers cannot themselves ever hope to own. The masters dehumanize them, call them by the names of beasts.” (Ha’aretz, Feb. 26/13)

    Times of Israel, February 21, 2013:
    “Former Foreign Ministry director-general invokes South Africa comparisons. ‘Joint Israel-West Bank’ reality is an apartheid state”
    EXCERPT: “Similarities between the ‘original apartheid’ as it was practiced in South Africa and the situation in Israel and the West Bank today ‘scream to the heavens,’ added [Alon] Liel, who was Israel’s ambassador in Pretoria from 1992 to 1994. There can be little doubt that the suffering of Palestinians is not less intense than that of blacks during apartheid-era South Africa, he asserted.”

    Ronnie Kasrils, key player in the struggle against the former South African apartheid regime, minister for intelligence in the current government and a devout Jew: “The Palestinian minority in Israel has for decades been denied basic equality in health, education, housing and land possession, solely because it is not Jewish. The fact that this minority is allowed to vote hardly redresses the rampant injustice in all other basic human rights. They are excluded from the very definition of the ‘Jewish state’, and have virtually no influence on the laws, or political, social and economic policies. Hence, their similarity to the black South Africans [under apartheid].” (The Guardian, 25 May 2005)

    Adi Ophir, professor of philosophy, Tel Aviv University: “…the adoption of the political forms of an ethnocentric and racist nation-state in general, are turning Israel into the most dangerous place in the world for the humanity and morality of the Jewish community, for the continuity of Jewish cultures and perhaps for Jewish existence itself.” (1998 issue of “Theory and Criticism,” published in Israel)

    The Independent, Dec. 27/2011:
    “…EU broadside over plight of Israel’s Arabs”
    EXCERPT: “The confidential 27-page draft prepared by European diplomats… [shows] that Israeli Arabs suffer ‘economic disparities… unequal access to land and housing… discriminatory draft legislation and a political climate in which discriminatory rhetoric and practice go unsanctioned.'”

    The U.S. State Department’s report on International Religious Freedom: “Arabs in Israel…are subject to various forms of discrimination [and the government] does not provide Israeli Arabs…with the same quality of education, housing, employment opportunities as Jews.”

    Jewish Voice for Peace, Washington D.C. January 19, 2013:
    “…what is meant by [Israeli] ‘apartheid?’ ”
    “What we are talking about is a system that is similar to the oppression of South Africa, but also unique…. We believe that in law and in spirit, the term ‘Israeli Apartheid’ is fair…'”

    Shlomo Gazit, retired IDF Major General: “[Israel’s] legal system that enforces the law in a discriminatory way on the basis of national identity, is actually maintaining an apartheid regime.” (Haaretz, July 19, 2011)

    Israel’s Jewish citizens of Ethiopian origin/ancestry also suffer from discrimination and human rights violations:
    Haaretz, January 27, 2013 – “Israel admits Ethiopian women were given birth control shots.”
    EXCERPTS: “A government official has for the first time acknowledged the practice of injecting women of Ethiopian origin with the long-acting contraceptive Depo-Provera.”
    “The women’s testimony could help explain the almost 50-percent decline over the past 10 years in the birth rate of Israel’s Ethiopian community.”

    Attacks against Israel’s Christian citizens are tolerated by the government:
    Ynet, June 13, 2013: “Christian cemetery in Jaffa desecrated. Graffiti reading ‘revenge’ and ‘price tag’ found on tombstones in Christian Orthodox cemetery. Jaffa’s Arab residents outraged over government inaction”

    • When it comes to anti-Israel propaganda I’m sure you know that the ‘usual suspects’ are The Guardian, The Independent, Haaretz, BBC and NY Times. Israel has its range of problems, like most countries, but Israel tries to deal with its problems through the democratic process, e.g. Knesset/Parliament and the High Court / Supreme Court. Israel has Arab judges, professors, doctors, academics etc. The panel of three judges that convicted the President of Israel of rape were two Israeli women judges and an Israeli Arab male judge as chairman.

  • Eduoard Hazboun

    To anyone ignoring as to whom the real Israelite are: This is the most absurd and ridiculous initiative ever presented to the World in order to continue with their atrocities, their social and financial crimes amongst all other they have already perpetrate on societies everywhere. Most, the majority of these people are neither Semitic, nor from our Isrealite tribes, and anyone supporting them base on some emotional connotation without really, really doing some major research and opening their intellect to understand they are using our ancestors Religion to cover up their crimes (not only crimes against humanity, but against governments and citizens from Germany, Africa, Middle east, America in General, and to say the least, the United States of America as they did to the USS LIBERTY and others), should go back to History and read how Palestine was and has been invaded and forced to assimilate to different religions due to occupation, and that is why, there are Muslims who were Israelite Jews and Christians who were Israelite Jews in Palestine, and many more who are mixed because of those and the Europeans who invaded Palestine as these Eastern (Russians) Europeans, and Khazars have. I don’t want to call you ignorant, for it would be unfair t do so since the subject of History has been manipulated by them for so long, but if really interested in finding out the truth you can let your finger do the walking and the research, but really research, do not only scuff the surface on GOOGLE or any other engine for they have also manipulated those articles and Historical data that comes up forefront. I am not here to argue with anyone, for I am both, I am Israelite Palestinian, besides European Sephardi (Jew) Hebrew, German, French who knows what else like any of you, so, if you are going to start trying to argue frantically like an thick brain, please do not trouble yourself. And yes, I want these Murderers committing Genocide stop and prevent American sons and daughters from being used as games to run their agendas and out in harms way. Enough is enough. If, anyone of you, sits down and do your intellectual math and data facts, you will see that overtime this Nation has gone to War, is being because they have put this country in such position to accomplish their agendas without regards for those American children dying needlessly to make them richer and commit Genocide in their name.

  • Rob

    I propose that we have ‘Gentile’, ‘Goy’, ‘Goyim’ and ‘Goyism’ insults internationally outlawed.

    F**k off, zionist head cases!!

  • Neither the race nor the religion problems there in, every human is going against each other thats the devil Satan who encourging people to quarrel with each others in society, country continents humanity living on earth planet we don’t want to think over bringing of peace and well being to each other. We become non-contented unsaturated and unbearable behavior. We left the scarification for others became selfish and regardless. So why the lord Jesus/God should accept our deeds as good deeds and allow our heart and mind also our body soul in calm and serene. God bless us and give us wisdom to do good: Amin

  • Semites are anti-White!

    • Peter

      Exactly. Why should their hatred be protected and when others hit back it’s an international crime?
      It’s a crime in several countries to express doubts about the Holocaust, and many people were prosecuted, fined and put away. It’s the only topic in the world that is protected by law from critical examination. Even God is not. Atheists or Satanists can utter the most horrible blasphemies against God, without legal consequences.
      The Pope is not protected, nor any other religious leader. No other religion is protected. No president or politician is protected. No topic is protected from critical examination. Only the Holocaust.
      It’s a tool for them to remove opposition. They made good experiences with it. Now they want to expand it worldwide.
      It’s not enough that they steal the producers and savers of the world’s money. They want all opposition outlawed. That’s how insecure they feel, because they know exactly that their racket is beyond justification. If they operated an honest money system, there would be no need for all this nonsense.

  • Neither the race nor the religion problems every human is going against each other thats the devil Satan who encourging people to quarrel with each others in society, country continents humanity living on earth planet we don’t want to think over bringing of peace and well being to each other. We become non-contented unsaturated and unbearable behavior. We left the scarification for others became selfish and regardless. So why the lord Jesus/God should accept our deeds as good deeds and allow our heart and mind also our body soul in calm and serene. God bless us and give us wisdom to do good: Amin

  • Hannon

    This is just more disgenics at work. Anybody with an IQ above room temperature would be taken out of society under this, but what I don’t understand is, who do those filthy Jews intend to parasite off of if they get their way?

  • Dawn

    Why don’t we educate people on why Germany became anti-Semitic in the first place! Now there is a really interesting story!

    • Ross

      Watch the YouTube documentary: The Greatest Story Never Told. This is a life changing film of truths about WW2.

      • Gunnlaug Ormstungu

        Agree Ross

        I also strongly receommend Hellstorm

        about the crimes the so called good guys (allies) comitted against Germans in WW2

  • Dawn

    They want to enable International “thought-police” when ANYONE at all criticizes a jew/s and or Israel alone?? How about we go ahead and make it a crime to think and say derogatory things against the blacks….. after all it is ISRAEL who is currently practicing race hate towards their African refugees and holding them in their own concentration camps. Israel would gas off all the blacks if they could get away with it…. as well and completely exterminate every last Palestinian who’s land they stole and now terrorize! Hmmm do sound “anti-Semitic”???? I suppose Israel would have me gassed then too! The only problem is that my criticisms happen to be true. They better kill me if I live to see a Zionist NWO!

  • sk

    Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, white countries for everybody.
    Everybody says there is this race problem. Everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and ONLY into white countries.
    The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

    Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

    What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

    How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

    And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

    But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

    They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

    What does Mr. Baker think about this?

    • Richard Braverman

      SK, who do you think passes the laws that create open immigration into Europe? Who do you think promotes policies to invade third world countries to rob the local people of their resources and cause huge dislocation of populations? Who do you think uses public money to build private factories in the third world and then use ant-protectionist laws to force western markets open to third world produced products. Who do you think uses the banks to impoverish people in the developing world and create artificial boom and bust cycles in the West. I’ll give you a hint. Its the same people who enforce thought control laws to provide cover for their crimes and instead blame everybody else. Laws to make anti-semitism evil are evil.

  • Joham Starrevelf

    They hate the Palestinians and that is also an International crime. The prime minister is a racist like his uncl Adolf. Put all those liats on prison
    (Both sides)

  • fred hofer

    great … & then call israel on their antisemitism 🙂
    paletinian people are a semitic people.
    most “israelis” are NOT. they are slawic.
    they come ftom russia/eastern europe.



    ALL THE MFA WOULD SAY IS THAT THEY HAVE MAINTAIN A DIALOGUE WITH THE UN… pls peruse our web site to learn more about PA/UNRWA antisemitism.

    • Enid Anderson

      Most people are not anti-Semitic, but you may encourage them to be so if you persist in this idiocy. Please distinguish between ‘anti-semitic’ and ‘anti-zionist’. I am not at all anti-Semitic but am virulently anti-Zionist.

      I would fight tooth and nail if this suggestion were adopted, to have anti-Muslimism declared an international crime as well – then Israel would be in trouble as it continues to attempt to obliterate the Palestinians

  • Yale

    It will be amusing to see which countries, if any, are willing to sign on.


    But to be anti-Aryan?????? Nothing?

  • Fifi Alive

    we strongly support it: “Any form of antisemitism should
    Be regarded as an International Crime” !!!

    • TruthUnderFire

      You sir are a couple cans short of a six pack. It’s people like you who should be taken to the town square, put in stocks and locked there while people throw food at you for a few days. These leaches will have an EXTREMELY broad definition of what THEY consider as “Antisemitism”. This will NOT be hate against Jews. THAT in and of itself IS a crime and should not be tolerated. But what they’ll go for is ANY criticism of #Israel, questioning of the Holocaust, Jewish motives. Out of my 20+ Jewish friends, 19 agree that what is going on in Gaza is inhumane and unacceptable. Furthermore most are angered that Netanyahu has the balls to “Speak for All Jews”!!! WhoTF does this guy think he is?

      And my point is, where do we draw the line? How much control do we relinquish? How can anyone stand by and let this happen?

      Over my dead body and the bodies of other Patriots!

    • Marcello Hameister

      Including palestinians? They are all semitic. Bibi is eurasian.

  • Jock Doubleday

    They don’t even know what a Semite is.



  • Julian Clovelley

    This is a minefield. What is proposed sounds reasonable until you try to enshrine it in legislation and legal practice and procedure

    For a starter there is no Court structure in existence that I can discern for trying such matters. Setting up such a structure is hardly a suggestion to be taken seriously when proposed by a nation that has not even ratified the International Criminal Court, and attacks those who choose to use its offices

    But let’s look further. To legally define antisemitism would be very difficult without first defining a “Jew” – a matter not even agreed amongst those who call themselves “Jews”. The next problem is one of discriminating acts carried out that are motivated by anti “Jewish” racism (again demanding a clear defining of “Jewish”) from those motivated by objection to perceived behaviour, which would equally be protested against if such actions were carried out by anyone else – including members of one’s own perceived group. It might be enlightening for people who regard themselves as Jewish, for example, to have a Court find that boycotts and criticisms of Israel, and those Jewish Institutions who financially support it, are not legally definable as antisemitic. But I doubt if that is the result that Zionists seek.

    Specific legislation against antisemitism may be impossible to enact except as a clearly defined sub-section in general anti-racism legislation. But in recognising such a section it would be necessary to endorse the legislation in its entirety and accept Court finding based on it. This would inevitably result in Zionism, on grounds of its self created and admitted “racial” exclusivity, being tested in court as a racist worldview – which to the Non-Jew (if we assume for a moment there is such a person as a Jew) it frequently is perceived to be.

    A minefield. I suggest one starts with general racial vilification legislation and moves on from there. Seeking special categories emphasises “otherness”. That to me is a dangerous form of self labelling, opening the floodgates to the possibility of Scapegoating and persecution

    I understand the writer holds qualifications in International Law. But I fear he is falling into the oldest trap of all: “A lawyer who represents himself has a fool as a client”. I sympathise with his apparent aims but see him as far too close to make the detached assessment required. Let me put it very simply – multitudes of people including many who would be involved in such an international law initiative do not accept the real existence of Jews in the manner he is likely to. That isn’t racism but a personal growing away from the entire concept of national identity and its mythologies of belonging and exclusion. It is that level of detachment from nationalist bias and worldview that would, from necessity, dominate the legal structure suggested.

  • n.l. shriber

    After 70 years of respite, anti-Semitism/anti-Jewish racism is back, worldwide. We can try to fight it of course. But, the only way to deal with it is to return home, to ascend to our homeland of 4,000 years, to what the international law identified as the national home of the Jewish people, located between the Jordan River and the Med. Sea.

    • Richard Braverman

      What a total religious nutter. Do you see what happens when you allow religious zealot fruitcakes control and decide what is and what is not legal. How do you think Palestine was stolen from the Palestinian jews, christians, muslims and druze? A bunch of political insiders used their financial muscle to purchase easily bought politicians to do their bidding, as in the the Boer War, the Balfour Declaration, World War 1, World War 2, The Mid East wars and Gaza today.

  • Would it not be better to put in place legislation that bans ALL forms of prejudice, insult, violence, hatred, acts to do with ALL race and religion? This will also foster mutual equality and respect amongst ALL religions, rather than one being ‘more special’ than another. All prejudice is wrong. There are far more incidents of, e.g., attacks on Muslim people, mosques, property, etc in Europe than there are on the Jewish community. I dont for a minute condone either, and therefore I think if there is to be legislation it should cover ALL hate crime – for ALL people, creed, race or gender.

    • william


  • Wherever there are Jews there will be anti-Semitism. Wherever Jews live, there should be LAWS to protect a Jews right to Freedom of expression, Religious Belief and the Integrity of Life. That exists in England! That exists in most Civilised Country’s. So an International Law governing one aspect of Race, Religious hate would serve to separate out Jews from the rest of Society?

    • Richard Braverman

      England, civilized ?
      How many countries in VERY RECENT history has ENGLAND invaded and destroyed. How many nations has the CITY OF LONDON bankrupted?

  • TRG-42

    Would make more sense to start making Israeli arseholism and ziofascism international crimes.

  • Lauren Goldman

    It would be great if this were passed, though the UN is pretty much an arab-run entity.

    • Richard Braverman

      Too funny !

  • Col Ha-Kavod – Congratulations !

    WHY didn’t anyone think of doing this before ?

  • No Baker. The time has come to show the jews and appeasers like you that you’ve overstepped yourselves BIGTIME. This will not end well for you. It never has and it never will. 88!

  • Absolutely absurd. If this was done during the writing of the Declaration of Independence we wouldn’t have gotten a Declaration of Independence.Why? Because that document was full of criticism of England and its King. Apparently The British yoke on America was protested and for good reason. Substitute The Jews or Israel for a 21st century Deckaration of independence and you’ll see how silly this Israeli Initiative is.
    This absurdity is also creeping into our State Houses in America by way of resolutions, one recently done in Massachusetts.
    I verbally and on paper protested what our Representatives did.
    The Jews or Israel isn’t immune from bad behavior. We have every right to criticize them as a group as we do of any other group without being labled in this case antisemitic.
    Just thinking of the audacity of this Legal expert to do this enrages me and problally thousands of others when they realize how this will stop free speech dead in its tracts.
    Bad idea, return to sender.

  • 1925 Wakf Temple Mount Guide or Temple mount
    by force 16 pages.
    Page 1 Cover and page 2 picture view of the Haram area from North to West
    In 1925 Moslems that controlled Temple Mount produced this guide which as it turns out is a pretty accurate history showing that they do NOT hold the original claim to the mount, but instead, took it by force. Admitting that even their own scholars admit it belonged to the Hebrews.
    Before 637 CE/AD Jerusalem was the Capital of the Jewish people for over a thousand years. Thereafter it was occupied by various conquering Nations as Occupied territory, It was allocated to the Jewish people after WWI under the 1920 San Remo Treaty and confirmed by the 1920 Treaty of Sevres and Lausanne.
    Read it for yourself and decide. Don’t take my word for it.
    Text only transcription of the guide for ease of reading.,
    A Brief Guide To AL-HARAM AL-SHARIF JERUSALEM – Temple Mount
    Published by the
    Supreme Muslim Counsel
    PRICE P.T. 15
    The Sacred Enclosure will normally be open to visitors between
    7.30 a.m. and 11.30 a.m. daily (Fridays excepted).
    Admission may be gained by the gate known as Bab al-Silsileh.
    Jerusalem 1925
    Visitors should bear in mind that the whole of the Haram
    Area, and not only it’s edifices, is scared to Muslims; and that
    they will be expected to pay due regard to its sanctity. In particular,
    they must abstain from smoking anywhere in the Area,
    and from bringing dogs with them.
    The visiting-hours are from 7.30 a.m. to 11.30 a.m. daily,
    (Fridays excepted) and visitors are particularly requested to leave
    punctually at 11.30 so as not to hinder the observance of the
    Admission may best be gained by the gate known as Bab
    al-Silsileh. It would save trouble and delay if visitors were to
    make it a point of entering the Haram by that gate.
    N.B. The photographs in this Guide are reproduced by courtesy of the
    American Colony.
    – 4 –

    The words al-Haram al-Sharif, which can perhaps best be
    rendered by “The August Sanctuary”, denote the whole of the
    sacred enclosure which it is the object of this Guide to describe.
    Its plan is roughly that of a rectangle whose major axis runs from
    north to south; its area is approximately 145,000 square meters.
    If you wish to have some idea of its extent and to see it whole
    before proceeding to examine it in detail, you would be well-
    advised to begin your visit by walking to the north-west corner,
    and there ascending the flight of steps which lead up to the
    disused building on the right, you will see the whole area spread
    before you. The view shown on the frontispiece (Fig. 1) was
    taken, although at a considerable altitude, from the very spot
    where you are standing.
    The two principal edifices are the Dome of the Rock, on a
    raised platform in the middle, and the mosque of al-Aqsa against
    the south wall. Other buildings which we shall consider later lie
    dotted about here and there. On the left along the east wall the
    double portals of the Golden Gate appear. On every side, trees
    break the prospect, which lend a peculiar charm to the scene.
    The side is one of the oldest in the world. Its sanctity dates from
    the earliest (perhaps from pre-historic) times. Its identity with the
    site of Solomon’s is beyond dispute. This, too, is the
    spot, according to universal belief, on which “David built
    there an altar unto the Lord, and offered burnt offerings and
    peace offerings”. (1)
    But, for the purposes of this Guide, which confines itself to
    the Moslem period, the starting-point is the year 637 A.D. In that
    year, the Caliph Omar occupied Jerusalem and one of his first
    acts was to repair to this site, which had already become sacred
    in the eyes of Moslems as the place to which the Prophet was
    one night miraculously translated. The site had long since been
    neglected. The Caliph and his four thousand followers found little
    more than desolation and rubbish. There were the ruined walls
    of the Herodian and Roman periods, the remains of an early
    basilica (probably on the present site of al-Aqsa), and the bare
    Rock. Yet from this rock had the Prophet according to the tradition,
    ascended to heaven on his steed. So the Caliph ordered a
    mosque to be erected by its side. His orders were executed, and
    the building was seen and described by Bishop Arculf who visited
    Jerusalem about 670 A. D. But no vestige of it remains today,
    save for the name “Mosque of Omar” which is still, but quite
    wrongly, sometimes used for the Dome of the Rock.
    With the reign of’ Abdul-Malek ibn Marwan, the Umayyad,
    685-705 A.D., the history of the present buildings begins. Jerusalem
    2 Samuel XXIV, 25.
    Page 5 – Pic. The fountain Sabil of Qait Bay
    – 6 –
    was a holy city, to Muslims as well as to others, and to
    the energetic and pious caliph its glorification seemed an obvious
    duty. He collected large sums of money, amounting (say the Arab
    historians) to “seven times the revenue of Egypt”; and with that
    he built the Dome (691 A.D.), and the mosque of al-Aqsa (693
    A.D.), both of which, according to medieval Arab travelers and
    chroniclers, were of unsurpassed magnificence. But in subsequent
    years, the buildings suffered much from earthquake shocks and
    underwent various restorations. In the year 407 A. H. (1016 A.D.),
    an earthquake shock caused the Dome to collapse, and it was
    re-erected six years later by the Caliph Hakem.
    A new chapter begins with the capture of Jerusalem by the
    Crusaders in 1099. They occupied the Haram Area and turned
    its monuments to different uses. The Dome of the Rock was turned
    into a church and an alter erected on the Rock itself. The edifice
    was regarded by them as the veritable Temple of the Lord
    (Templum Domini) from which the Knights Templar whose Order
    was formed there take their name. It is interesting to note also
    that, as Temple of the Lord and symbol of the Order, it served
    as a model for churches which were later erected at various
    places in Europe, such as Aix-la-Chapelle, Metz, Leon, and the
    Temple Church in London; and that it figures in Raphael’s famous
    picture of the “Sposalizio” (Brera, Milan,) and, still more recognizably,
    in the picture of “The Maries at the Sepulchre”, attributed
    to Hubert von Eyck. The mosque of al-Aqsa, on the other
    hand, was transformed in to a royal residence known as the Palace
    of Solomon; while the vast substructures below the south-east
    corner of the Area were used by the Knights as stables.
    The end of this chapter came in 1187, when Saladin captured
    Jerusalem and drove the Crusaders out. One of his first acts was
    to put back the buildings to their former use as places of Moslem
    worship, and he caused every vestige of the Templar’s occupation
    to be removed. At the same time he carried out important embellishments.
    In the Dome of the Rock, he caused the walls to
    be covered with marble, and set up the beautiful inscription
    which may still be seen above the open gallery of the cupola.
    He also restored the stucco incrustation of the inner dome, which
    remains to this day. In the mosque of al-Aqusa, he carried out
    restoration and embellishments, of which the chief were the fine
    mosaics on the drum of the dome and the beautiful pulpit ad-
    joining the prayer-niche.
    The Haram Area has remained in Moslem hands ever since.
    For although Jerusalem was again occupied by the Crusaders
    (1229-1244), yet their occupation did not extend to the sacred
    enclosure which it had been agreed should remain in Moslem
    possession. During the three centuries which followed, various
    repairs and additions were made; but the most important restoration
    was that which was carried out, after the Turkish conquest.
    In the reign of Sulaiman the Magnificent (1520-1566). This sultan
    whose works are still to be found all over the Holy City, carried
    out a wholesale renovation of the Dome of the Rock. A large part
    of the decoration in glazed tiles upon the exterior of the shrine
    and most of the windows were added during his reign. Since then,
    Page 7 – Pic The Southern Arcades (Mawazine) and pulpits Burliancddin
    – 8 –
    both buildings have undergone different restorations which have
    for the most part marred rather than enhanced their beauty.
    This is more particularly the case with the tiles on the exterior
    of the Dome of the Rock, which the hand of the restorer has
    here and there shifted or replaced most unhappily; and it is the
    present concern of the authorities of the Haram to try and undo
    the damage and restore to these decorative features something
    of their former harmony.
    The Dome of the Rock stands on an irregular platform whose
    level is some 12 feet above that of the Area. It is approached
    from every side by flights of broad steps surmounted at the lan-
    ding by graceful arcades (Fig. 3) known as Mawazin, that is to
    say ‘scales’, because of the traditional belief that on the Day of
    Judgment the scales of good and evil will be suspended there.
    Having ascended the steps on the raised platform, you should,
    before entering the edifice, walk around it and examine it from
    the outside first. Its plan is that of a regular octagon inscribed
    in a circle of 177 ft. diameter. It has four entrances, each of
    which faces one of the points of the compass: on the West, The Bab
    al-Gharb, or west gate; on the north, the Bab al-Janna, or gate
    of paradise; on the east, the Bab Daud, or gate of David; and
    on the south, the Bab al-Qibla or south gate. This last gate fixes
    the direction in which prayers are to be said, namely the direction
    of Mecca. The walls of the building are decorated with marble
    facings on the lower courses and with colored glazed tiles above.
    The tiles which form this decoration date for the most part from
    the end of the reign of Sulaiman the Magnificent (v. page 6) when
    the art of Oriental ceramic decoration was perhaps at its height.
    Unfortunately, a great many of the original tiles have fallen off,
    and others have at various times been set in their stead without
    apparent regard for the harmony either of color or pattern. Still,
    the effect is striking and, especially in certain lights, beautiful
    The frieze is inscribed with verses from the Koran. Above rests
    the Dome, as rebuilt by the Caliph Hakem in 1022, slightly flattend
    on one side, and surmounted by the Crescent. The edifice
    itself is substantially that which was erected by ‘Abdul-Malek ibn
    Marwan; but the outer decorations that we have just seen are
    mostly due to Suliaman the Magnificent, and to later restorers.
    On the east side of the Dome of the Rock, facing the Bab Daub.
    or gate of David, stands an elegant little edifice, also surmounted
    by a dome, which look at first sight like a miniature representation
    of its larger brother. The room which supports the Dome
    and it’s drum rests on two concentric rows of columns neither of
    which is encased by walls. On the south side is a Mihrab, that
    is to say the prayer-recess. The edifice is variously known as
    Mahkamat Daud, (i.e. Tribunal of David) and Qubbat al-Silsileh
    (i.e. Dome of the Chain), from the legendary belief that on its site
    was the place of Judgments where verdicts were given by a miraculous
    chain. For as the legend has it, a chain was once suspended
    Page 9 – Pic The Dome of the Rock (from the North-East)
    – 10 –
    from heaven over this spot, to which it was the practice in
    Solomon’s time to appeal in cases of conflicting evidence. Each
    witness was made to grasp the chain in turn: if he succeed in
    holding it, his truthfulness was thereby vindicated, but if it eluded
    his grasp, then he was a manifest liar. The edifice is said by some
    historians to be contemporaneous with the Dome of the Rock;
    but it is an established fact that it has been rebuilt more than
    once, albeit with the original columns which are in the Byzantine
    style and were undoubtedly taken from other buildings. Their
    number has varied: at the present time there are eleven in the
    outer, and six in the inner rows. (Fig. 4)
    We will now enter the Dome of the Rock (Qubbal al-Sakhra)
    by the west gate. The metal doors on either side of the entrance
    are worthy of notice; and inscription which was only recently
    discovered proves them to have been made and set up during
    the reign of the Mameluke Sultan Qaitbay, towards the end of
    the XVth. century. A few steps further, we find ourselves in the
    interior of the building. At first sight it is almost too dark to see;
    but as the eye gets used to the subdued light, the beauty of the
    structure and the splendor for the ornamentation reveal themselves.
    In the centre, vertically below the dome, is the Sacred Rock,
    an irregular mass of yellowish stone. This is where the Crusaders
    had set up an altar and traces can still be seen of the steps which
    once led up to it. The dome rests on an inner system of piers
    and columns forming a circle and connected with each other by
    a wrought-iron grille, dating from the XIIth. century — a unique
    remnant of the Crusaders’ decorations. This inner row is formed
    of four rectangular piers, beautifully adorned with marble facings
    dating from the XVth. century, and twelve monolithic columns
    with Byzantine capitals carrying semicircular arches. Above is the
    drum with its rich mosaics, its delicate inscription on bands and
    medallions, and 16 windows; while, resting on the rim above
    the clerestory windows, is the inner (wooden) cupola, with its
    remarkable stucco ornamentation, ordered by Saladin in 1189.
    Concentric with inner system which we have just described
    is the outer octagonal row of piers and columns supporting
    the roof. The piers in this row are eight in number and are of
    massive size, covered with XVth. century marble facings; while
    the columns, of which there are sixteen, are marble monoliths
    taken from some older building, probably Hadrian’s Temple of
    Jupiter. The capitals, which are of varying design, belong to the
    late Greco-Roman or the early Byzantine period. Above each
    capital is an abacus on which rests the decorated beam which
    runs round the octagon and serves as an “anchor” beam from
    pier to pier-an interesting architectural feature, probably of Arab
    origin, which is characteristic of the earliest mosques. Between
    each pair of piers are three arches richly adorned with old mosaic
    dating, except for certain later restorations, from the VIIth.
    century. Above is a narrow band of blue tiles on which runs an
    inscription in gold Cubic letters, which is of great historical importance,
    for it records the date of the construction of the edifice
    and the name of the builder, with a chronological inconsequence
    which tells its own tale. The date is given as A.H. 72 and the
    Page 11 – Pic The Rock
    – 12 –
    name as that of the Caliph al-Mamun who reigned in A.H. 197-218:
    an obvious anachronism, of which the explanation is that the
    name of the later Caliph was substituted for that of his predecessor,
    ‘Abudul-Malek ibn Marwan , the real builder of the Dome of
    the Rock, while the original date remained unchanged.
    The walls of the edifice, which as we have seen form a regular
    octagon, are covered with marble slabs and pierced with
    windows dating, for the most part, from Sulaiman’s restorations.
    The slabs are of beautiful marble specially chosen for its smooth-
    ness and remarkable veining. The windows are made of plaster,
    and their pattern consists of an intricate openwork tracery in
    which are inserted bits of colored glass. The effect is one of
    great softness and richness of color, and this is partly due to
    the skill with which the tracery is hollowed out of the plaster
    and cut away towards the inside in such a way that the openings
    become provided with a kind of cone for the softer diffusion of
    the rays of light.
    A detailed description of the Dome of the Rock would be
    beyond the scope of this Guide. Its principal features have been
    mentioned and described in sufficient detail, it is believed, to give
    the visitor an adequate summary of its history and some help
    towards the appreciation of its magnificence.
    Leaving the Dome of the Rock by the west gate, the visitor
    will notice, some 50 yards away on the right, a small octagonal
    domed edifice of semi-oriental and semi-Gothic appearance. This
    is the Qubbal al-Mi’raj or Dome of the Ascension. It was originally
    built in commemoration of the Prophet’s miraculous ascension,
    and rebuilt in its present form about the year 1200 A.D.,
    that is to say some thirteen years after the capture of the Holy
    City by Saladin and at a time when Gothic influence in building,
    which had been imported by the Crusaders, was still at its height.
    The monument is not open to visitors.
    Turning towards the south, we cross the platform to the
    arcades on its southern side, passing on the way the marble
    pulpit of Burhaneddin (Fig. 3) which was built by the judge of
    that name in the middle of the XVth. century. The pulpit is
    crowned by a dome supported by trefoil arches resting on columns,
    and is an interesting as well as a beautiful example of the work
    of that period. Beyond the pulpit are the steps leading down to
    the court of the mosque of al-Aqsa. Immediately in front is the
    fountain of ablutions, and beyond that is the mosque itself.
    The porch, which is the most recent part of the building,
    was added by the Sultan al-Mu’azzam, a nephew of Saladin, in
    the XIIIth. century. An inscription above the middle archway
    records the date as 634 A.H. (1236 A.D.). The porch consists of
    a facade of seven pointed arches, corresponding to the seven
    front doors of the mosque, and affords yet another example of
    the Crusaders’ influence, although not a very happy one.
    The interior of the mosque is unfortunately only partly accessible
    Page 13 – Pic The Al-Aqsa Mosque (front)
    – 14 –
    to visitors at the present time, on account of the considerable
    repairs which have to be carried out to that part of the
    buildings which supports the dome. But visitors are admitted to
    the nave and aisles and can gain some idea of the whole. The
    nave, formed by two rows of massive columns with capitals, is
    the oldest part of the mosque. On either side of it, is an aisle,
    both of which date also from the earliest period; the outside
    aisles are of more recent construction. The columns of the nave
    were probably taken from Justinian’s basilica; while the capitals,
    which are mostly of the acanthus-leaf and wicker-work patterns,
    date from Byzantine times and are probably contemporaneous
    with the construction of the mosque itself. The columns support
    a system of pointed arches of which the exact date is not known
    for certain. Their pointed form, however, shows plainly that they
    belong to a later period that the VIIth. century, for in that period
    the pointed form had not yet been evolved and the horse-shoe arch,
    as we have seen in the interior of the Dome of the Rock, was
    still prevalent. The columns are connected by wooden tie-beams,
    which as we have seen (page 10) is a device characteristic of early
    Arab monuments. Above the arches are two rows of windows;
    the lower open on the inner aisles, the upper are clerestory
    windows admitting air and light from the outside. (Fig. 7).
    Above the crossing stands the dome resting on a circular
    drum supported by a system of arches and pedantries, which
    are themselves borne at the tour corners by groups of pillars and
    capitals. The dome, which is of wood protected on the outside
    by a covering of lead sheeting, is ornamented with a handsome
    stucco incrustation of the same style as that of the dome of the
    Qubbat al-Sakhra. This decoration may, like its counterpart in
    the Sakhra, date from the time of Saladin; but be this as it may,
    it was completely renovated, if not actually made in the first
    instance, but the Sultan Muhammad ibn Qalaun in the year 728
    A.H. (1327 A.D.), as the beautiful inscription on the blue band
    around the cupola testifies. The drum and the four arches with
    their pedantries are covered with a beautiful mosaic on a gold
    ground dating from the end of the XIIth. century, that is to say
    from the restoration carried out by Saladin (v. page 6).
    To the west of the crossing runs the broad transept with its
    colonnade of pillars taken from older buildings. A few interesting
    Byzantine capitals of wicker-work design are worth noticing. The
    transept is continued into a vaulted gallery which dates from the
    occupation of the Crusaders, and was used as quarters by the
    Knights Templar.
    The Mihrab (or prayer recess) in the south wall, facing the
    nave, is ornamented with mosaics and flanked with splendor and
    elegant marble columns. According to an inscription in mosaic
    above the niche, the work is due to Saladin. To the right of the
    Mihrab stands a handsome pulpit made of wood and beautifully
    ornamented with inlaid ivory and mother-of-pearl. It was made
    in Aleppo, as the inscription on it testifies, by the Sultan Nureddin
    in the year 1168 A.D., and was brought to Jerusalem by order
    of Saladin towards the end of the century. Above the prayer-niche
    are windows dating from the XVIth. century.
    Page 15 – Pic The Al Aksa Mosque (interior)
    – 16 –
    Leaving the mosque of al-Aqsa by the front entrance, we
    turn to the left and proceed to the south-east corner of the Haram
    Area where a staircase leads down in to the vast subterranean
    substructures known as Solomon’s Stables. The first flight of steps
    takes us down to the small chamber, now used as a place of
    Moslem worship, which was believed in medieval times to have
    been associated with Jesus Christ’s infancy. This belief was prevalent
    long before the advent of the Crusaders and was subsequently
    accepted by them. In the angle between the west and
    south walls of the chamber is a little dome borne upon four
    marble columns; and underneath the dome is a small niche lying
    horizontally, which was believed in early times to have been the
    Cradle of Christ and referred to under that name by several
    Arab historians.
    In the west wall of the chamber, a door opens into a stair-
    case descending to Solomon’s Stables. This is a vast subterranean
    chamber, of roughly rectangular shape, of which the chief feature
    is the imposing size of the piers. Of these, there are fifteen rows
    of varying size and height supporting the vaults on which rests
    the roof. Little is known for certain of the early history of the
    chamber itself. It dates probably as far back as the construction
    of Solomon’s Temple. According to Josephus, it was in existence
    and was used as a place of refuge by the Jews at the time of
    the conquest of Jerusalem by Titus in the year 70 A.D.. We also
    know that this space was used by the Knights Templar as stables,
    and the holes to which they tethered their horses can still be
    seen in the masonry of the piers. Such evidence as is afforded
    by the masonry itself, and more particularly by the contrast
    between the lower and the upper courses of the larger piers,
    would tend to show that they belong to two distinct periods, and
    that the upper parts and the vaults were of Arab construction
    superimposed upon ancient foundations.
    The substructures supporting the nave of the mosque of
    al-Aqsa are not accessible.
    The best way out is across the esplanade, past the porch
    of the mosque of al-Aqsa, and back to the Bab al-Silsileh. An
    alternative would be to continue northwards past the Bab al-
    Silsileh to the gate known as Bab al-Quttanin, a handsome gate
    dating from the reigh of Sultan Muhammad ibn Qalaun (1336 A.D.)
    and typical of XIVth century Arab work. To the south-east of
    this gate is the Sabil (or drinking fountain) built about the year
    1460 A.D. by Mamluk Sultan Qaitbay -an attractive
    building, perfect of its kind. (Fig. 2).
    G. A.
    Franciscan Printing Press, Jerusalem – back page
    1925 Wakf Temple Mount Guide or Temple mount by force.
    In 1925 Moslems that controlled Temple Mount produced this guide which as it turns out is a pretty accurate history showing that they do NOT hold the original claim to the mount, but instead, took it by force. Admitting that even their own scholars admit it belonged to the Hebrews.

  • Howie Subnick

    Alan, you are a mech with a brain. Thank you for fighting for the Jews. Iknow this will encompass others and for this I am very proud of you. Sholom

  • Charlotte

    Anti Semitism is a crime.
    Since the 1960’s if Black people were treated 1/10th as badly as Jews are treated, you would see Al Sharpton in NYC travel anywhere to march and sue and make a lot of money.

    • Richard Braverman

      Charlotte, you overlook the Dutch, British and Portuguese merchants who were the driving force behind the Atlantic Slave Trade. Unbeknownst to Al Sharpton, he probably has a home in American and New York because of the financial lust of 17th century Rabbi.

  • NuritG

    With this initiative I sincerely hope that the new atisemitism – the collective attacks on Israel, all anti-Semitic – will not be avoided. Today anti-Zionism is not recognised as anti-Semitism, even though it is, because whilst antisemitism has been, for a while, taboo-ed in the western world, especially in Europe since WWII – anti-Zionism has replaced it. The individual anti-Semitism we have known and identified has morphed into collective one, named anti-Zionism, and has been allowed to run wild in the corridors of the UN and some governments, has been intellectually digested and barfed on campuses, has been culturally enshrined and has become the slogan of “nobility” for the 21st century righteous growing religion: “human rights”!

    Even when acts of flagrant antisemitism are perpetrated, like in a kosher shop in Paris, there is the intelligentsia to claim it has to do with Israel’s actions, which they claim is rightfully criticized for no reason and no connection. Adding to this western obsession with Israel is their governments’ compulsive protection of the image of Islam, most of its members are anti-Semites, you get new antisemitism strands that are no longer recognized as such and they keep on popping up new.

  • Michael

    I like it!
    Since anti-Semitism appears to be an international preoccupation often resulting in violence against Jews or their institutions, it makes sense that anti-Semitism should be legally recognized as an international crime.

  • Yoel Nitzarim

    The concept is truly inspiring. Notwithstanding, the effort to bring such a phenomenon as anti-Semitism to a realistic halt will never be achieved in the courts. In my opinion, merely recognising Anti-semitismI as an international crime will not affect its virulent tendencies and its insatiable influences, especially among the youth. It is an acquired phenomenon taught by parents and society and has been for millennia. Education is the only way to deal with this international problem. At present, very sadly to say, it is evident that education and the younger generation is on the losing end.

  • esther noodelman

    Brilliant Idea to have Antisemitism recognized as an international crime!

  • citizenstat

    Well, if the Muslim countries are pushing the UN to make ‘defamation of religion’ (so far, criticism of Islam) a crime, then certainly anti-Semitism should be regarded as equally heinous, right?

  • NuritG

    finally someone with vision and courage. Do not let it off the hook till it become a CRIME, international crime

  • Gabrielle Grossman

    I have wondered why it has not been listed as an international crime along with crimes against humanity and religious persecution in the I.C.C. All crimes targeting Jews/Israelis should be prosecuted, so that world opinion can be better informed.
    Reading about the terror-tunnels built by Hamas to store weapons to terrorize Israeli’s as well as the terrorists to wield those weapons, this crime comes to mind. I have been reading that, instead of spending the funds attributed for rebuilding Gaza, Hamas is instead spending these funds on rebuilding the terror-tunnels, with the idea of winning over Israel in their next war. I am thinking this may be a crime, or the planning of many future crimes.
    Then, I wonder about the Hamas charter, proclaiming their goals to get rid of the country of Israel, and I’m wondering if that charter motivates the building of terror-tunnels, and is the charter a crime? Well, it’s just antisemitism in words, not deeds.

  • Eve Laing

    I think it is a good start to recognize that anti-Semitism is again becoming a problem in Europe in general, and in Universities in America and Australia where Jewish students are doing it tough. However, this action to support the initiative should be part of a larger effort to combat all the negative hate propaganda put out and spread through the internet as well as major newspapers. Being Pro-Active is the way that includes film and documentaries. It is something that we are good at and it is time to get going. It will only get worse if we bury our heads in the sand. And we all know where that leads….

  • Scott

    Next the Muslim’s will want to make “Islamaphobia” and “International Crime”.
    You see where this is going?

  • Ray A. Cohn

    Palestinian terror organizations have complained that Israelis have committed all kind of “atrocities” against the Palestinian people.

    What they don’t tell you is that they put kids near the 10,000 rockets that they had in the Gaza Strip before they were launching them against Israel to kill Jewish kids and civilians.

    They also don’t tell you that in 1967 the UN Security Council passed Resolution 244 that calls for all the named parties — including Israel and participants in that year’s Six Day War such as Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Lebanon — to recognize the right of the other parties to live in “secure and recognized boundaries.”

    That includes the right to live free from threats and military threats by any of the other parties. How many of those provisions have the Palestinians met. HOW ABOUT NONE!

    • Ross

      Ten thousand rockets. Is that all? Come on are you Jewish or what? You can do better than that. What about six million, or six gazillion rockets. Oy vey.


  • Absolutely. It is long overdue. Jewish people all over the world MUST take a stand and speak out against the evil of Anti-Semitism.

    We are a strong people, proud of our heritage; That is who we are.

    • Ross

      Aye, and you have been kicked out of 109 different countries and states in the last millennia. Aye strong people right enough.
      Come to think of it the jew decree passed by Edward 1st in 1209 to remove all Jews from England has not been repealed, therefore you are illegal in England to this day.
      Go to Birobijan. Your Jewish state in Southern Russia given to you by Lenin.

  • Antisemitism is wrong and spreads hatred and disaster thru the world. We are humans need to at least care about one another NOT KILL OR DESTROY.
    I pray the world will be better, but afraid it will no be so.

  • Great idea! and please, make it illegal in academia. Our finest colleges are becoming discriminators against Jewish people. This must be illegal! Jewish organizations need to empower the Jewish students to feel comfortable being themselves on campus.

    • Ross

      “I strongly disagree with what you say but, I will die for the right for you to say it” Voltaire.
      You want to imprison the intelligentsia because you don’t like what they say? Just like Bolshevism in the soviet union. Jew run bolshevism.