In the Case of Gay Gaza Commander Executed for ‘Moral Crimes,’ New York Times Editorialists Are MIA
Error: Contact form not found.
by Ira Stoll
A brief news article in the New York Times last week reported that Hamas has called for resuming the death penalty in Gaza. According to the report, capital punishment there has “mostly stopped” since 2014, though “an exception was the case of Mahmoud Ishtiwi, a Hamas commander, who was fatally shot in April for ‘moral crimes’ after he was accused of theft and of having sex with another man.”
Good for the Times for reporting on the issue, and for its earlier enterprising page one coverage of the Ishtiwi case. But, one wonders: Where is the follow-up from the Times’ editorial page and columnists?
The appointment of Avigdor Lieberman as Israel’s defense minister generated a lead Times editorial denouncing him, in part, because, he “has proposed instituting the death penalty for convicted terrorists.” The Times also ran two op-ed columns hostile to Mr. Lieberman.
So, in the case of an Israeli official who merely proposes executing terrorists, the Times mounted a full-fledged editorial campaign. In the case of the Palestinian Arab regime in Gaza actually carrying out a death sentence on a suspected homosexual, the Times editorial page fell totally silent. And not merely silent.
It’s as if the paper’s editorial writers are contorting themselves to avoid mentioning the issue. A recent “editorial observer” column about places where “gay and transgender people are widely stigmatized” singled out Uganda, Jamaica, the Dominican Republic, Gambia, Russia and Nigeria. Bizarrely, the column did not mention Gaza at all.
Likewise, as of this writing at least, there has been no Times editorial denouncing Iran for the 30 college students who, the Times news section reported, were each given a punishment of 99 lashes “for attending a graduation party that included men and women.” This, despite the flood of Times editorials advocating the US-Iran nuclear deal and denouncing Prime Minister Netanyahu of Israel for opposing it.
It’s a classically anti-Israel and anti-Jewish double standard. An Israeli Jewish politician merely suggests executing genuinely criminal terrorists, and the Times editorial page whips itself into a frenzy of outrage. Meanwhile, Gazan and Iranian Muslims actually impose the death penalty on someone suspected of being gay — or order an extensive public violent beating of college students for the “crime” of attending a co-ed social event — and the Times editorialists take a pass. It’s pathetic.
More of Ira Stoll’s media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found here.
Jewish, Israeli Humanitarian Groups Mobilize to Help Nepal After Devastating Flash Floods
Israel-Lebanon Deal Under Strain as Hezbollah Disarmament Falls Short
Leading Famine Expert Largely Silent as Catastrophic Predictions for Gaza Fail to Materialize
‘Jewish Motherf—kers’: IDF Reservists Debate New Yorkers Over Israel
London Police Take No Further Action Against Bob Vylan Lead Singer Over ‘Death to the IDF’ Chant
Award-Winning Australian Writer Claims Bondi Beach Terrorist Attack Was Not Antisemitic
Four Men Plead Guilty to Arson Attack on Jewish Ambulances in London
Iran Urges Countries Not to Implement New US Sanctions as Mediators Focus on Reopening Strait
Syrian President Names Former Commander of Kurdish-Led Force as Adviser
The Double Standard Applied to Israel










