Monday, August 21st | 29 Av 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
August 12, 2011 10:00 am

Declaring a Palestinian State, Yet Again

avatar by Daniel Pipes

Email a copy of "Declaring a Palestinian State, Yet Again" to a friend

Yasser Arafat.

The Palestinian Authority’s push to declare a Palestinian state is hardly a new idea. By my count, this is the fourth iteration. I described the first instance as follows:

” On October 1, 1948, Amin al-Husayni, Mufti of Jerusalem, stood before the Palestine National Council in Gaza and declared the existence of the All-Palestine Government (Hukumat ‘umum Filastin). In theory, this ‘state’ already ruled Gaza and would soon control all of Palestine. Accordingly, it was born to lofty proclamations of Palestine’s free, democratic, and sovereign nature, and with a full complement of ministers. But the whole undertaking was a sham, for Gaza was run by the Egyptian Government of King Faruq, the ministers had nothing to do, and the All-Palestine Government never expanded to all of Palestine. Instead, this state quickly withered into insignificance, and for the next two decades, the goal of a Palestinian state virtually disappeared.”

And then:

Almost exactly 40 years after the first proclamation of a Palestinian state, a second one took place on November 15, 1988, again before a meeting of the Palestine National Council. This time, Yasser Arafat, head of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), declared the existence of a State of Palestine. In some ways, this exercise was even more futile than the first, for the new state was proclaimed in Algiers, almost 2,000 miles and four borders away from Palestine. This state controlled not an inch of the territory it claimed, and this one faced a powerful Israeli adversary.

Related coverage

September 19, 2016 6:32 am
0

Israel Is High on Medical Marijuana

JNS.org - Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes Israeli entrepreneurs succeed because they challenge authority, question everything and don’t play by the rules. “The...

Those two instances are ancient history but the third attempt, in 1999, uncannily resembled today’s situation.

As I noted at the time:

“When a state is declared, the results will be severely adverse for Palestinians and Israelis alike. This flagrant breach of the Oslo accords will cause economic relations to diminish further and violence to increase. … The United States and Israel are more important in this case, as in so many others, than the other 180 nations. I hope they will not just refuse to recognize the Palestinian state by make it very clear to Arafat and the Palestinian Authority that a unilateral declaration will be costly to the Palestinians. Continued negotiations are the sensible alternative to a unilateral declaration of independence. The issues are difficult and the process protracted; there can be no arbitrary date for the conclusion of negotiations, for this merely invites Palestinian procrastination. For negotiations to succeed, the process must go on until its natural conclusion.” And now September 2011: “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • ELLIE GOLDBERG

    I DON’T BELIEVE THAT THE SO CALLED PALESTINIAN PEOPLE DESERVES A
    A PALESTINIAN STATE. THE WAY THAT THEY DEMEAN THE STATE OF
    ISRAEL WHO WOULD THINK THEY BE EXPECTED TO BE ABLE TO EVEN RUN A GOVERNMENT,IF THEY CAN’T RESPECT OTHER GOVERNMENTS AND PEOPLES IN WHICH THINK DIFFERENTLY THEN THEY DO, THEY HAVE TO BE IN A POSITION DO DEAL WITH ALL SORTS OF GOVERNMENTS
    AND I AM NOT SURE THEY ARE MATURE OR READY TO DO THAT.
    THANKS FOR READING AND LISTENING
    ELLIE GOLDBERG

Algemeiner.com