Sunday, January 16th | 14 Shevat 5782

February 12, 2013 2:27 am

The Gatekeepers: Peddling Two-State Propaganda All the Way to the Oscars

avatar by Gidon Ben-Zvi

'The Gatekeepers' screenshot.

The Gatekeepers is a highly acclaimed Israeli documentary that tells the story of the Shin Bet from the perspective of six former heads of Israel’s secretive internal security service. Directed by Dror Moreh, the film has been nominated for Best Documentary Feature at the 85th Academy Awards.

Related coverage

January 27, 2019 6:35 pm

Hezbollah Says Two Obstacles Remain for Lebanon Government

The leader of Lebanon's Iran-backed terrorist group Hezbollah said on Saturday that two obstacles remain before the formation of a...

I recently went to see The Gatekeepers, which is currently playing at the Jerusalem Cinemateque. Unfortunately, I came away from the screening of this much-hyped exposé into the inner workings of the Israeli intelligence agency with little new insights and a splitting headache.

Indeed, Mr. Moreh’s cinematic offering did little more than reflect and reinforce a tired belief among many on the Israeli left that the nation’s original sin was its lightening fast victory over Egypt, Jordan and Syria in the Six-Day-War that took place between June 5 and June 10, 1967. Displaying a film maker’s gift for the dramatic, The Gatekeepers director portrays a country corrupted by victory; a people forced by circumstances to become brutal occupiers. One former head of the Shin Bet, Avraham Shalom, went so far as to compare the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to Hitler’s Wehrmacht (German army during World War II).

While no one can deny the bravery, brilliance and patriotism of good men who have given the better parts of their lives to the service of country, one can and should take a cold hard look at how they were manipulated by a film maker with an agenda.

In a recent interview, Dror Moreh said: “I’m wondering, when [Israeli Prime Minister] Benjamin Netanyahu says ‘two-state solution,’ with whom does he want to speak? Does he want to speak with Hamas?  With Iran?   [Former Prime Minister Yitzhak] Rabin said there’s a small window of opportunity [for peace.] It is closing…the day that [former Prime Minister Ariel] Sharon got the second stroke was the worst day in Israel’s history after the assassination of Rabin” in 1995.”

Mr. Moreh’s documentary is nothing of the kind. Rather, it’s a propaganda piece extolling the indisputable virtues of a two-state solution. Not only is peace possible between Israel and the Palestinians, so goes the narrative, The Gatekeepers director has even gone through the trouble of inventing an arch enemy to peace in our time: “Never ever in the history of this country has there been  such a good and understanding leadership on the Palestinian side, and Israel does everything in its power to avoid conversation.” (Italics added)

How can a documentary be objective if only one point of view is shown? No, dear reader, the talented Mr. Moreh did not present the historical subject matter in a factual and informative manner. Instead, he used actual news clips and interviews accompanied by narration to convey the look and feel of a thoroughly researched documentary. Underneath the façade, however, lies little more than a few unexamined tropes that contribute nothing to a frank and honest discussion about the ultimate fate of lands conquered by Israel in a war of survival 45 years ago.

While The Gatekeepers director is entitled to his personal crisis of confidence regarding where Israel goes from here, it is intellectually dishonest for the film to be presented as a cold, dispassionate analysis of Israel’s war on terror.

Despite its problematic methodology, one shouldn’t be surprised that The Gatekeepers has achieved mainstream success, first in Israel and then abroad. After all, the worldwide mainstream media shows a consistent liberal bias – and liberals are opposed to Israel, which they view as the power in the region.

The Gatekeepers fails to live up to the hype that it is a film that documents – primarily for the purposes of instruction or maintaining a historical record – the successes and failures of the Shin Bet.

Still, one can’t deny the superficial appeal of a ‘mockumentary’ that includes exceedingly rare interviews with six former heads of Israel’s internal secret service agency.

As such, I’d like to nominate The Gatekeepers, if it’s not too late in the awards season to do so, for a prize at the 33rd Annual Golden Raspberry Awards. The Razzys are known for creating special categories to suit special films.

And the Razzy for ‘Worst Migraine-Inducing Misuse of Archival Footage’ goes to…

The Gatekeepers!”

Has a nice ring to it, no?

This article was originally published by The Jewish Thinker.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.