Saturday, March 17th | 1 Nisan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

July 18, 2013 5:34 am

The EU’s Broken Mideast Compass

avatar by Noah Beck

Email a copy of "The EU’s Broken Mideast Compass" to a friend

View of the Har Homa settlement in the West Bank. Photo: James Emery.

The European Union recently sent out a directive barring its 28 members from cooperating with Israeli entities in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The boycott includes “all funding, cooperation, and the granting of scholarships, research grants and prizes” to Israeli entities in East Jerusalem and the West Bank.

If this is how the EU chooses to spend its limited diplomatic and political resources “to help” the Middle East, then its moral compass is badly broken. The EU still hasn’t even mustered the clarity or courage to join the USA, Canada, and six Gulf states (led by Bahrain) in designating Hezbollah a terrorist organization, even though Hezbollah has committed terrorist acts on EU soil that killed an EU citizen, and has supported Basher Assad’s butchery in Syria. The EU has also failed to take any decisive action to address the urgent crises in Lebanon, Syria, and Iran (which marches ever closer to nukes, and imports ore for armor and missile production from Germany and France). And where is the EU’s boycott of Mideast governments that persecute women, execute homosexuals, and condone the slaughter of Christians?

If the EU wants to wield its economic clout to impose peace on disputing parties, why not boycott China for its brutal occupation of Tibet? Clearly that occupation doesn’t matter because the EU is China’s largest trading partner. And why isn’t the EU boycotting Northern Cyprus, which is under foreign military occupation by Turkey (against the wishes of the EU)?

The hypocrisy is even more flagrant because some EU states are themselves occupying disputed territories on various continents. One of the most notorious examples is the Falkland Islands. What exactly is the UK’s burning security interest in occupying a Latin American island nearly 8,000 miles away? Maybe the EU should boycott the UK as well.

In the end, an EU boycott of Israel is just a cheap way to score political points with the oil-producing Arab states and the growing Muslim population on European soil. Indeed, the EU’s anti-Israel directive resembles Stephen Hawking’s ill-fated attempt to inject himself into the Israeli-Palestinian controversy. Just as he absurdly chose to boycott the country largely responsible for the technology that enables him to communicate, the EU shamelessly targets the only country in the Middle East that actually shares the EU’s democratic values, respect for human rights, pluralism, and the rule of law (not to mention shared interests like curbing Iranian nukes, developing natural gas resources in the Mediterranean Sea, and seeing moderates prevail in the volatile Middle East).

Putting aside the EU’s abundant hypocrisy, trying to strong-arm Israel into unilateral concessions has already proven to be an abysmal failure when it comes to promoting peace. Just ask President Obama, who in 2009 pressured Israel into a 10-month settlement freeze in the West Bank without requiring any reciprocal gestures from the Palestinians. They quickly realized that they need not negotiate with Israel because Obama was doing that for them. One can hardly blame Palestinians for trying to maximize their negotiating posture, even if it lacks good faith. Thus, peace talks have remain stalled for Obama’s entire presidency, even though Secretary of State John Kerry is now making his sixth peace-pushing trip (in as many months) to the region.

It’s also worth noting that the real obstacle to peace — Palestinian rejectionism and terrorism — existed before any of Israel’s settlement-building. Palestinian terrorism and rejectionism from Gaza also continued despite the removal of Israeli settlements (from Gaza in 2005). So Israeli settlements did not create Palestinian extremism and their removal doesn’t necessarily end it.

History has also demonstrated that Israeli settlement building has not prevented Israel from making painful territorial compromises for peace: Menachem Begin evacuated the Sinai, Ehud Barak ended Israel’s presence in Southern Lebanon, Ariel Sharon left Gaza, and Benjamin Netanyahu handed over West Bank territories under the Wye Accords.

Moreover, the EU seems to have forgotten that Jews have a historical and legal right to be in the West Bank. The “Mandate for Palestine” confirmed by the League of Nations recognized the “historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine” and “the grounds for reconstituting their National Home in that country.” Under Article 6, the Mandate encouraged “close settlement by Jews, on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes.” The EU’s boycott falsely implies that Jews have no right to live in the West Bank, and is thus disturbingly reminiscent of the “Judenrein” policies of Nazi Germany, which banned Jews from certain spheres of life only because they were Jews.

Lastly, the EU (and U.S.) position on Israeli West Bank construction lacks balance because Palestinian construction is never limited. As Eli Hertz notes: “The Oslo Accords do not forbid Israeli or Arab settlement activity. Charging that further Jewish settlement activity preempts final negotiations by establishing realities, requires reciprocity. If Jews were forcibly expelled from the West Bank in 1948 during a war of aggression aimed at them [but then recaptured the West Bank in the defensive war of 1967], then these Territories must be considered disputed Territories, at the least…According to David Bar-Ilan, a former policy planning official, the tempo of Arab construction is “more than 10 times the number of buildings under construction [in the Territory] than those approved [by the Israeli government] for the [Jewish] settlers.”

If the EU wants to ignore international law and history, the many more pressing Mideast issues, and its own hypocrisy, all for the sake of promoting Israeli-Palestinian peace, then it should at least recognize that unilateral pressure on Israel has only reinforced Palestinian inflexibility. Indeed, it is only the Palestinians who have refused to negotiate peace without preconditions. The EU has pressured the wrong party because its Mideast compass is badly broken.

Noah Beck is the author of The Last Israelis, an apocalyptic novel about Iranian nukes and other geopolitical issues in the Middle East.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Jose Carp

    One must never forget that France’s General de Gaulle boycotted the delivery of the Mirage fighters spare parts, exclusively used by Israel, two days after the beginning of the Six Day War which started on the 5th of June 1967. Israel went on to use American fighter planes as the French proved unreliable…

  • Is there any way to get the UE to comment on above article? It would be very interesting reading.
    could you give me an answer?

  • Harry Orenstein, FRICS

    Well now …
    Three rockets exploded in Israel, launched from Gaza.
    Fair is fair …
    EU stop commercial and funded projects in Gaza.

  • Jay Ghetty

    Europeons strike again! 90% of the world Jewish population does not know or care what boycott the Europeons implement. Northern Cyprus, Falklands, Tibet, Hizbully…your singing to the choir…The only thing the Europeons understand is oil… and natural gas, which they obviously do not want from Israel…

    So just say it: The Europeons declared economic and political warfare on Israel…

    For years now, the ultra-religiously secular Europeons have been at/declared war on G-d; now who are you betting on in that war?

    Make no mistake about it, secular & agnostic & atheist; they are all religions based on belief…just like all the other religions…

    • Jay Ghetty

      I would bet every thing I have that EU leadership that voted for “this” have property in the northern section of Cyprus “occupied” by Turkey; Yes after illegally occupying part of Cyprus, the Turkeys immediately began selling the stolen villas to the: Europeons!

      Well what do you know about that!

  • Joyce Elais

    The EU needs to clean up its own backyard before trying to tell others how to suck eggs.

  • BH in Iowa

    Cultured and progressive Europe is the birthplace of every fascist and totalitarian ideology except islam… and they’re importing that by the boatload.

    Europe is closer, ideologically and politically, to hezbullah and hamas than they are to the US and the West.

  • Pamela Deane Chester

    Oh EU, you ” shot yourself in the foot!” Almost all medical treatment and cures of health problems have come through the Jews. Also agriculture, engineers, etc. ( lawyers are in a different category!) If I had to make a decision between a doctor “Stein” or a ” Patel” I would choose Stein! As I said………choose; however, many Americans may loose that choice under OB care!

  • Joy

    Their attitude is simply history repeating itself again and again and again. Futile behavior from second rate organisations.

  • Miri

    Well said. Now if only the EU was able to understand the logic presented here, things would be different. Sadly, we all know that is highly unlikely. They repeat history time and again and the only one to blame for the woes of the world are the Jews. So typically European and so typically dense.