Wednesday, October 18th | 28 Tishri 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
October 2, 2013 9:41 am

Chagall’s Jewish Jesus Exhibit at NYC’s Jewish Museum

avatar by Bernard Starr

Email a copy of "Chagall’s Jewish Jesus Exhibit at NYC’s Jewish Museum" to a friend
Marc Chagall, Apocalypse in Lilac: Capriccio (1945)

Marc Chagall, Apocalypse in Lilac: Capriccio (1945)

Last week I viewed the new exhibit of Marc Chagall’s paintings at New York’s Jewish Museum (Chagall: Love, War and Exile). The show features images of the Jewish Jesus, a subject of great interest to me as the author of the recently published book, Jesus Uncensored: Restoring the Authentic Jew. On entering the first gallery I was surprised to see an orthodox Jew in traditional dress staring at a large painting, The Falling Angel. Set in Chagall’s shtetl, his small Jewish village in Vitebsk, Belarus, this striking work depicts a fiery angel plummeting upside down to Earth, signifying the age of terror for Jews (the Nazi era). The painting also includes an image of Jesus nailed to the cross, a mother embracing a baby, and a frightened rabbi escaping with a Torah scroll. It’s the largest and most impressive painting in the exhibit.

In interviewing people of all faiths for my book, I found that Jews are typically put off by Christian images, and many will not allow the name Jesus to pass their lips. So I was curious about the young Hasid’s view of the painting he was looking at. Was he expecting what the name Marc Chagall usually conjures up? Magical, allegorical and playful images of Jewish life. At first he hesitated when I asked him about the painting, but when I pressed he said “it’s troubling” but would not elaborate.

The fact that Jesus was a committed practicing Jew is lost on most Jews. Not surprising in view of the unspeakable acts of persecution that Jews endured for more than a thousand years, often in the name of Jesus, although Jesus had nothing to do with these acts and would have been horrified by them.

My brief encounter in the gallery punctuates the importance of the Jewish Museum exhibit, which includes 24 images of the Jewish Jesus that center almost exclusively on the crucifixion. Chagall was captivated by the crucifixion for its analogy to the suffering of Jews throughout history and particularly during the Holocaust. For Chagall, the crucifixion represented the Jewish people. In these paintings, Jesus is identified as Jewish as well as Christian, with some images displaying a tallit wrapped around the dying Jesus rather than a loin cloth, and other Jewish symbols.

Related coverage

October 17, 2017 11:42 am
0

Fates of Disgraced Hollywood Mogul Harvey Weinstein’s Planned Projects, Including Film About Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, Remain Unclear Amid Scandal

Harvey Weinstein's slew of planned upcoming films may be affected by the sexual ­harassment-and-assault scandal surrounding the disgraced producer and movie...

For example, Apocalypse in Lilac (Capriccio) pictures a naked Jesus on the cross with a halo, but also donning Tefillin (phylacteries) on his head and arms and draped in a long prayer shawl. Jesus is glaring down at a Nazi storm trooper displaying a swastika armband. Off to the right is a terrified child and a Jew gripping a Torah scroll. Chagall’s Persecution shows the crucified Jesus with the shtetl burning in the background. In Christ and the Artist Chagall puts himself in the painting, looking up at Jesus on the cross while holding an artist’s palate. Calvary, his cubist rendition of the crucifixion, depicts Chagall’s parents standing at the base of the cross with hands outstretched ready to catch the martyred Christ, represented as a child. The Crucified is a horrific image of slaughter in a shtetl. Slain bodies are strewn on the ground, including a young woman holding an infant, and the streets are lined with crucified men in contemporary Eastern European dress. A sign on one of the crucified says “Ich bin Jude” (I am a Jew). A man sits on a rooftop clutching a rescued Torah scroll.

Other paintings in the exhibit celebrate Chagall’s early life in Russia, his romantic images of his love for his wife, Bella, paintings during his exile in New York during the war years, and his life in Paris after World War II. Lovers among the Lilacs (1930) is a tender erotic image of Chagall and Bella in a more peaceful moment before the war.

The Jewish Museum exhibit contributes significantly to countering the bulk of Medieval and Renaissance artworks about Jesus, his family and followers, which completely eliminated their Jewish identities and heritage. These paintings commonly depicted them as blond fair-skinned Northern Europeans immersed in anachronistic Christian settings, with saints, high church officials, and Christian artifacts. Art historians dismiss the omissions as the Renaissance style of contemporizing images. However, it’s one thing to contemporize physical appearance and dress, even setting (palatial vs. crude village habitats), but quite another matter to steal identities and falsify biblical history. The “style” rationale is also given lie by the fact that Renaissance images of classical Greek figures and heroes, sometimes pictured in contemporary Renaissance attire and settings, are not also seen holding crucifixes (which did not exist as a Christian symbol until the fourth century) or kneeling in Christian prayer poses surrounded by Christian saints and church officials.

Walk through the Renaissance galleries of any major museum and you will be greeted at every turn with totally Christianized images of the Jewish Jesus and others in his community, without any acknowledgement of the distortions and omissions. To get a conversation going on this subject, perhaps it would be useful for museums to place Chagall’s images, as well as those of several 19th-and 20th- century artists who created a small body of Jewish Jesus artworks, alongside some of the Medieval and Renaissance works.

While Chagall’s powerful paintings restore Jesus’s Jewish identity, they focus primarily on one theme: the common ground of suffering — Jesus suffering on the cross signifying the suffering of Jews in horrendous persecutions. But there remains a need to show the Jewish Jesus in other contexts to counter the distortions in Medieval and Renaissance artworks, which have contributed to anti-Semitism by feeding the illusion that Jesus and Jews were of different religions and ethnicities. Toward correcting that, I’ve invited artists to submit revised renditions of Medieval and Renaissance artworks that put Judaism back in the picture, as well as other submissions that integrate Judaism and Christianity in the persona of Jesus, as in Chagall’s paintings. I hope these new works will show the two sides of the Jesus story: Jesus the dedicated Jew and Jesus whose life and teachings inspired a new religion.

Bernard Starr is a psychologist, college professor, and journalist. He is the author of Jesus Uncensored: Restoring the Authentic Jew. Website: click here.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Basha Weiss

    Whether there was a Jesus or not, I can no longer look to the Talmud, the Christian Bible or any other so-called revealed books. Those books have been translated so many times since their original writing. How can anybody with any brains accept those writings as absolute truth or even guidelines for living? They are irrelevant and harmful to many people. An example is young people in fundamentalist organizations who feel they can never fit in or who are gay. A great number of these young people end up committing suicide. And for what?

    Organized religion, contrary to what most people will parrot, does not teach people to be kind to each other. It teaches that only one religion is truth and to feel sorry or condemn those who disagree. No one needs a religious leader or a narrow-minded doctrine to know that killing another person (other than in self defense) is wrong or stealing from another person and leaving them hurting is wrong. I believe most of us were created with concepts of ultimate right and wrong. There are bad people in the world-“bad seeds” or those that hurt others out of anger and, in many instances, in the very name of religion.

    How crazy, how evil is it to remove the clitoris of a girl and sew her up? How ridiculous is it to believe that someone has to wear magic underwear or not shave a beard or cover their head?

    I have freed myself from believing that God wrote ANY book or is an entity that revealed itself in any way.

    My belief is that because human intelligence is so limited, we cannot conceive of what lies beyond our solar system, beyond other universes. We cannot understand the concept of infinity. Existence is so much more vast than our little world, supposedly created in seven days.

    I am Ashkenazi by heritage and DNA. When I freed myself from all the pettiness and silliness of religion of any kind, I became liberated.

  • Mark NYC

    I just can’t get myself interested in Jesus, Jewish or otherwise. Our forbears have suffered too much for me to want to spend time on this subject, and we continue to suffer to this day (see e.g. Goldhagen’s new book on current worldwide antisemitism). It’s one thing to have a dialogue or rapprochement with the Christian world; it’s another for us to spend our time concerning ourselves about Christ. If he really was a Jew, he should be expressing regret to his maker for all the suffering his followers have inflicted on his people in his name.

    • Sigh. Yes, Christ was a Jew, whatever the shortcomings of his later Gentile followers.

      Even in their wildest dreams the most tent-revival, “Sawdust Trail”, bible-thumping Christians wish Israel to thrive and treat Jews with civility, kindness, and decency, while an increasingly Islamic world wants another holocaust. Think about it.

    • If Christians would see Jesus as the dedicated Jew that he was—and a Jew who never even hinted about starting a new religion—it could mitigate a lot of anti—Semitism. And Jews rejecting and condemning Jesus–and Christianity–will not help reduce anti-Semitism. Yes, great atrocities against Jews have been committed in the name of Jesus. But Jesus has been hijacked to front theses acts. What would Jesus say? In fact, name one—just one—act that Jesus committed to harm Jews. I can name many acts that other false Jewish Messiahs committed to severely hurt Jews and Judaism. Yet some of these “Messiahs” are still revered by Jews.
      In my book I include a chapter (“How Dare You in My Name”) in which Jesus testifies against Popes, monarchs, Church officials, and other leaders from the fourth century to the twentieth century asking them to explain how anything in his life (Jesus) and teachings justifies their murderous acts against Jews.

      • Ari ben Yehuda

        Jesus was a Jewish revolutionary not intent or committed to starting Christianity. He was executed simply for exposing the corruption surrounding the High Priests who were in turn forced into it by the Roman occupation. Christianity should actually be called Paulism and those following it should be called Paulists.

Algemeiner.com