Monday, October 23rd | 3 Heshvan 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
October 13, 2013 2:45 pm

Hands Off: A New Approach to the Mideast Peace Process

avatar by Chas Newkey-Burden

Email a copy of "Hands Off: A New Approach to the Mideast Peace Process" to a friend

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, Israeli Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, and Palestinian Chief Negotiator Saeb Erekat. Photo: State Department.

Quick, gather round — I’ve found the solution to the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.

I do, at least, have an original suggestion toward that end, and that’s something that has proved just as elusive since 1948.

It’s a curious proposition, but it might just work: let’s make 2014 the year in which the world leaves the Israelis and Palestinians alone to resolve their differences.

I’m not suggesting we literally leave them to fight it out. Instead, I am suggesting that we allow them to discuss their differences, without us incessantly chipping in.

Related coverage

October 23, 2017 2:21 pm
0

New York Times on Jewish Identity: Pork, an Israel-Apartheid Slur and Bashing Adelson and Netanyahu

Sunday’s issue of “T,” The New York Times' style magazine, carries a four-page feature headlined “Great American Novelists” in which...

For more than 65 years, the world has tried to solve this dispute and the only thing everyone can agree on is that the world has failed.

Little wonder — just look at the kind of people who stick their noses in. There are politicians whose primary motivation seems to be to distract their constituents from local concerns. Not on top of things in Bradford or Boston? Have a go at the Jews or posture against the Palestinians.

Then there are evangelical saviours, who wring their hands or wag their fingers as they wonder wistfully why we cannot just all get along better. What a novel idea!

We cannot forget the bored and boring activists, who fill their otherwise empty existences by trading boorish, well-worn arguments and always putting all of the blame for the stalemate on the opposing “side.”

Their hope is not so much to solve the conflict, as to impose their own narrow ideology on the two peoples — all from the comfort of their Western living-rooms, of course. As Alan Dershowitz observed, they are more Palestinian than the Palestinians, or more Israeli than the Israelis. What use are they?

And what about those who have made a career out of meddling from afar? Were peace to break out in the Middle East, how would these professional campaigners pay their mortgages?

We all stand in a circle, from which we bark our own nugget of advice: boycott, withdraw, settle, negotiate, stand firm, defend, attack!

If I ever found myself in deep trouble, and any of the above rabble showed up offering to help, I think I would prefer to take my chances and go it alone. Few people make their best decisions when they are being yelled at.

So why don’t we try leaving the Israelis and Palestinians to it? It’s the only thing we have yet to try.

The world would benefit either way. Politicians would be able to start repairing their own countries and communities. Activists would be able to clear out their attics, talk to their families, and catch up with old friends. Evangelicals would have more time to strum their acoustic guitars and sing Kumbaya.

If I sound as though I’m only semi-serious, that is because I am. Too many people have their egos, ideologies, and careers invested in this one, relatively small, conflict to be able to leave it alone. But, in reflecting on whether our input is of use, we can at least test the sincerity of our commitment.

The wise Chabad rabbi Yisroel Lew once explained to me a simple way to understand whether your motivation to help someone is sincere or not. Imagine, as you go to help someone, that you suddenly realize they do not need you. Would you be pleased for them, or would you be disappointed you were denied your chance to help? If the latter, then your motivation was probably insincere.

We can apply this sincerity test to our own involvement. Unless we are sure our motives are sound and our contribution needed, let’s give the Israelis and Palestinians some peace and quiet, so they can start working towards some peace and quiet of their own.

This article was originally published by The Jewish Chronicle.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Here are my ‘two bits’ on where the ongoing Mideast peace process fits into ‘The Great Scheme of Things’, as per what I wrote in the following web narrative in 2002:

    http://olivetdiscourse.blogspot.com/

    And, Sandy Brown, do not be surprised if you do see peace in the Middle East in your lifetime. Remember how shocked we all were when the Berlin Wall came down in November, 1989; something that few of us believed would ever happen in our lifetime?

  • Sandy Brown

    I know one thing. There will not be peace in my life time. Maybe in 100 years.

  • Anthony dayton

    One other factor needs consideration-leave the two alone financially. Countries give the Palestinians billions of dollars to sustain themselves without having to develop an economy and devote resources to it. This allows them to keep the status quo and terrorism. Then these countries, or some of them, turn around and give money to Israel to develop and maintain its defenses.

  • John Sanocki

    Since Palestinians have stated many times that they are only interested in one state solution without Israelis living in the Middle East, any discussions about peace agreement are useless.

    The Israeli government should follow the example of USA and treat Palestinians the way US treats Puerto Rico.
    Israeli government has control of all the lands where Palestinians live, they should have their own government, are Israeli citizens but do not vote in Israeli elections.

    Would US State Department object to other countries doing what USA is doing?

Algemeiner.com