Thursday, May 24th | 10 Sivan 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
January 26, 2014 5:18 pm

Goodbye, Harriet Sherwood: 3 Years Covering Gaza, No Lessons Learned

avatar by Adam Levick

Email a copy of "Goodbye, Harriet Sherwood: 3 Years Covering Gaza, No Lessons Learned" to a friend

Photo from print edition of Harriet Sherwood's recent report.

Harriet Sherwood’s latest 3,200 word report, Goodbye Gaza, accurately reflects the Guardian‘s unwritten ideological “style guide,” which seems to dictate that even the most malevolent Palestinian political actors are framed in a sympathetic light.  “With a heavy heart,” the strap line begins, Sherwood “pays a farewell visit to Gaza and pays tribute to the resilience, creativity and humour of its people.”

After a few paragraphs in which we’re introduced to her Guardian stringer, Hazem Balousha (who played a key role in Jon Donnison’s infamous fauxtography scandal in 2012), Sherwood’s characteristic Hamas obfuscations begin in earnest:

The people of Gaza are reeling from a series of blows that have led some analysts to say that it is facing its worst crisis for more than six years, putting its 1.7 million inhabitants under intense material and psychological pressure. Israel’s continued blockade has been exacerbated by mounting hostility to Gaza’s Hamas government from the military regime in Cairo, which sees it as an extension of Egypt’s deposed Muslim Brotherhood. The Egyptians have virtually cut off access to and from Gaza, and as a result Hamas is facing crippling financial problems and a new political isolation.

Power cuts, fuel shortages, price rises, job losses, Israeli air strikes, untreated sewage in the streets and the sea, internal political repression, the near-impossibility of leaving, the lack of hope or horizon – these have chipped away at the resilience and fortitude of Gazans, crushing their spirit.

First, as a report at the Algemeiner by Elder of Ziyon demonstrated, “the current Gaza fuel crisis started when Hamas decided in 2011 that it didn’t want fuel from Israel and instead chose to run Gaza’s power plant with Egyptian fuel, sold by smugglers at lower prices that reflected the subsidy that Egypt provides.” When the Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood lost power, the tunnels were closed and Hamas lost its source of cheap fuel. However, instead of paying market prices, Hamas cynically chose to shut down the power plants, causing a crisis as water treatment plants shut off. Qatar then offered to transfer to Hamas large amounts of fuel, which it held in storage tanks in Egypt, and Israel agreed to transport Qatari oil from Israel, after unloading it in Ashdod. However, Palestinians objected to both of these proposals.

Yet, Sherwood assigns no blame to Hamas for the Gaza fuel shortages she describes.

Further in her report, Sherwood gives a broader view of Gaza and her coverage of the region since 2010.

This was my last visit to Gaza before returning to London to live and work. I moved to Jerusalem in May 2010, to report principally on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but also social and cultural issues and the regional upheavals that erupted three years ago. Since I first came here almost 10 years ago, I had been fascinated by the place, its people, its history and its compelling complexity.

I arrived eager to learn more about what is frequently called the world’s most intractable conflict, and to try to understand the powerful feelings of historical injustice on both sides. I am leaving angry about an occupation that has lasted close to half a century, weary of Israel’s grinding oppression of the Palestinian people, cynical about the political leadership on both sides and in the international community, and pessimistic that a fair resolution will be reached.

Again, note how, other than her criticism of “political leadership on both sides,” Sherwood’s concluding assessment of the conflict singles out Israeli “occupation” and “oppression,” but leaves Hamas unscathed.

Later, reporting on the crossings between Israel and Gaza, Sherwood writes the following:

…the vast hangar-like terminal on the Israeli side echoes to the footsteps of these few, plus a tiny number of Palestinians, nearly all of whom are going to or returning from business trips or hospital visits

According to figures released regularly by COGAT, about 400 Gazans are permitted to travel (for various reasons) into Israel each day through the Erez crossing. This number includes an estimated 100 Palestinians (and family members) who enter Israel for medical care each day – hardly a “tiny” number.

Further along in her report, there are the following passages detailing the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza which again aptly illustrate Sherwood’s failure to hold Hamas morally accountable for their decisions:

Fourteen months after that mini-war [Operation Pillar of Defense], on this last visit, Hazem and I talked of the hope – now long faded – that swept Gaza when the Israeli army and Jewish settlers pulled out in 2005. The sense of liberation at the time, and the dream that Gazans might be free to determine their own future, and become a model of a future state of Palestine, was swiftly dashed on the rocks of Israel’s political actions and military operations, and the rise of Hamas.

Of course, Sherwood’s prose characteristically blurs cause and effect, obfuscating the plain fact that Israel’s military actions followed the rise of Hamas – particularly the Islamist group’s decision to focus its energies (and limited funds) not on economic development, but on the production and importation of thousands of rockets to launch attacks against Israeli communities, and on hate indoctrination of their youth against “the Zionist entity.”

Jan. 15, 2014: Hamas Interior Minister Fathi Hammad speaks to graduates of the organization's youth camps in Gaza, calling on them to annihilate Israel and take their struggle across the world.

Sherwood also all but ignores Hamas’ decision to spend millions of dollars on terrorist tunnels, funds which could have been spent on infrastructure projects and other vital social needs.

Indeed, the closest Sherwood comes to blaming Hamas for the plight of Palestinians in the territory is her brief mention of the “continued political enmity between Hamas and Fatah.” And, though she laments “grieving [Palestinian] mothers who expressed fervent hope that their infant sons would grow up to avenge their dead fathers or siblings by killing Jewish children,” she contextualized such a disturbing dynamic as “a profoundly depressing illustration of the cycle of violence here.”

Near the end of her story, Sherwood does allow one Palestinian to express criticism of the Islamist group governing the territory:

Mkhaimer Abusada, professor of political science at Gaza’s Al Azhar university old me over sweet mint tea. “But we are very afraid. Hamas does not allow any protests, any opposition. We’re sick and tired of Hamas, but we don’t have an alternative.

Though, the despotic regime in control of Gaza does indeed limit Palestinian options, they did have the ability to make a very important decision about their future following Israel’s unilateral disengagement in September 2005. In January 2006, Palestinian legislative elections were held and Hamas took 44.45 percent of the vote, whilst Fatah received 41.43 percent.  One of the only “moderate” factions running, Salam Fayyad’s Third Way Party, garnered a mere 2.5 percent.

Alternately, it is quite telling that when Israelis are poised to make decisions considered injurious to the peace process, Guardian journalists aren’t nearly as circumspect in rendering moral judgments.  In the weeks leading to Israel’s January 2013 national elections, Sherwood (and Guardian journalists across the board) were warning that the new government would represent a move far to the far right, with some even suggesting that the 33rd Israeli government would be “the most right-wing government in its history,” an alleged rightward lurch which Sherwood cautioned was resulting in the state’s increasing international isolation.

As we know now, the Guardian got it wrong and, in fact, a more centrist government emerged from the elections, one which has engaged in serious peace negotiations with the Palestinians – though their warnings and castigations about the injurious effects of Israeli “provocations” such as building homes in eastern Jerusalem continues.

Alternately, there seems to be no degree of Palestinian pathos which elicits similarly ominous warnings by Sherwood, or others at the Guardian, about the inevitable negative consequences of freely choosing such dangerous paths.  When free of Israeli occupation, and given the freedom to vote in relatively fair elections, a plurality of Palestinian voters cast their lot with an extremist movement – ostracized by the West – which oppresses women, gays, religious minorities and political opponents, and openly calls for Israel’s destruction and the mass murder of Jews.

Palestinians will never learn the most intuitive lessons from their self-destructive embrace of extremism – and other similarly dangerous political decisions – as long as they’re continually denied moral agency by assorted liberal racists, faux humanitarians and activist journalists like Harriet Sherwood.

Adam Levick is the managing editor of CiF Watch, an affiliate of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA).

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Asaf

    Harriet tries to hide her antisemitism unsuccessfully in the middle east conflict.
    Too bad she still writes.
    I will not read the Guardian any more.

  • Saidi

    GOOD RIDDANCE TO JIHAD JANE!

  • Fritz Kohlhaas

    We have not heard the last from that terrorist supporter.
    She will write a book and/or go on the speaking circuit.
    She will not stop telling lie.

  • Stephen Green

    Goodbye and good riddance Sherwood you and your lies will not be missed. You have not done the none people any favours by propagating your falsehoods based on lies created by the gutter press. One day your lies will be exposed in the day of judgement and you cannot hide behind your supposed ignorance. If you had bothered to look into the conflict as it really is then you might learn something of the truth of the matter. Your nothing more than an Anti-Semitic who hates the Jewish people. Educated? Maybe but not showing it in your racist paper column. It’s okay Israel there are enough of us out here who love the Jewish people and about your God Blessed return to the land of your forefathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob to see right through these deceitful lies. Shalom Israel

  • L.Poddebsky

    Harriet Sherwood and her despatchers are not uneducated, stupid or uninformed. When, therefore,they disseminate such lies, half-truths and distortions, their motivation must be hatred of the Jewish People.

  • Efram Paul

    What I wish for her, and for all such pseudo progressive bigots, is that she marries someone in Gaza, and goes to live there, in the traditional surroundings. I wonder if she would ever get out alive?

  • Martin Bookspan

    “Good riddance to bad rubbish”. That old saying acquires new meaning in the case of this twisted “journalist” who disgraces the time-honored journalistic principles of truth and honesty in reporting. Now the hoped-for next step will be the disappearance of the Guardian itself.

  • Martin Bookspan

    “Good riddance to bad rubbish”. That old saying acquires new meaning with the departure of this twisted traitor to journalistic standards of truth and honesty. Now if only the Guardian itself would disappear……

  • Carol

    In the words of Ben Gurion: “It matters not what the world (and the Sherwoods) say. What matters is what the Jews do.”

  • Moshe

    The hapless flying instructors who taught the 9/11 attackers to fly, unwittingly participated in the unprecedented horror of a Just Society’s freedom being wielded as a weapon against itself.

    Harriet Sherwood enjoyed freedom of expression and a first world environment in the democratic oasis of Israel precisely because Jews instinctively welcome her and many others of her ilk, as she so fervently refrains from mentioning. Newly-unfettered “World Opinion” notwithstanding.

    The enemy Israel faces in Gaza will not rest until we are all submerged in the Mediterranean, peace process or not. They can only succeed by channeling our own public introspection against us.

    Her welcome departure will no doubt elicit further public self flagellation among her Jewish accomplices. This will further promote continued wielding of our own humanity as a weapon against us.

  • Emmett

    Harriet Sherwood did leave Gaza with something else.
    A severe case of crotchrot on her face.

  • Eric R.

    I do not understand why Israel even allows virulently anti-Semitic media in the country, such as the Guardian or the BBC. Israel’s freedom of the press does not apply to outside news outlets who whip up hatred of Jews and Israel, and even can drive people into a violent anti-Semitic frenzy.

Algemeiner.com