Monday, May 21st | 7 Sivan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

May 6, 2014 12:17 pm

If Not Peace Now, When?

avatar by Jerold Auerbach

Email a copy of "If Not Peace Now, When?" to a friend

PA Negotiator Erekat Addresses Reporters With Secretary Kerry. Photo: State Depatment.

Israeli journalist Ari Shavit has abruptly shifted into reverse gear – for the second time in a week. Writing in Haaretz (April 24), he revisited his misguided faith in “peace now” under Palestinian negotiator Mahmoud Abbas from 1997-2014. “People as steadfast as us,” he wrote, “don’t give up on our dreams.”

Repeatedly blaming Prime Minister Netanyahu and his Likud party for the failures of the no-peace process, he evidently did not comprehend until last month that Palestinians (paraphrasing Abba Eban’s memorable observation) never missed the opportunity to miss an opportunity for peace. It took nearly two decades, but Shavit finally grasped the bedrock Palestinian principle: “the Palestinians must not be required to make concessions.” No longer, he wrote, would he be duped by Abbas’s claim to be “a serious partner for true peace.”

Yet less than one week later, in The New Republic (April 28), the old Ari Shavit abruptly reappeared. No sooner had John Kerry finally relinquished his prolonged, futile, and misguided attempt for peace now than Shavit launched his own “New (and Plausible) Plan for Peace” with paeans of praise for the failed Secretary of State. Kerry, he wrote, “is a hero,” indeed a “tragic twenty-first century Sissyphus.” Determined to succeed where so many of his predecessors had failed, he “marshaled his significant stamina, invested his precious time and risked his political capital to carry out the noble mission of bringing peace to the Promised Land.” Alas, he “rolled up the rock of Middle East Peace just to see it slip from his hands and roll down the slope into the abyss.”

Why “were the peaceniks mistaken,” Shavit wondered (yet again). We “solution-oriented liberal Westerners”  believed that the conflict began in 1967, when Israel responded to an imminent attack from its Arab neighbors by winning the Six-Day War and returning to its biblical homeland. But Shavit knows better: the “formative trauma” for Palestinians had occurred nineteen years earlier, when five Arab nations, joined by Palestinian militias, attempted to destroy the fledgling Jewish state.

It remains “highly unlikely,” he concedes, that Palestinian refugees would relinquish their demand for a “right of return.” But best estimates indicate that only 30-50,000 displaced Palestinians remain alive to assert that claim. Israel could easily admit all of them without any significant demographic threat to its Jewish majority. But there is a problem: nearly five million descendants of refugees also claim refugee status. The United Nations Relief and Works Administration, established exclusively to support their claims, effectively collaborates in their plan for the demographic destruction of Israel.

So Shavit returns to Square 1 of his Peace Now advocacy: “we who believed in Old Peace were totally right about the futility of occupation and the scourge of settlement.” He does not deign to consider whether a nation (Israel) can “occupy” its own historic homeland, where centuries of Jewish sovereignty once flourished. Nor does Shavit mention the right of Jews to “close settlement” of the land west of the Jordan River, guaranteed under international law since 1922 when two-thirds of mandatory Palestine was lopped off for Prince Abdullah’s new kingdom of Trans-Jordan.

Shavit proposes a “New Peace” to replace the failed “Old Peace.” But they sound remarkably similar. Israel will “freeze all settlement activity” and “initiate limited pullouts from the West Bank.” Nothing is required of Palestinians. Then the United States (presumably under President Obama’s leadership from behind) will oversee the establishment of Palestinian development zones, financed by the Saudis and Gulf States, supplemented by European “NGO activity and civil-society building.” Shavit’s inspiring principle of “interdependence and mutual economic interests” will eventually prevail, guided by “American behind-the-scenes thinking, planning and prompting.”

All “sensible middle-class individuals” on both sides of the border (Shavit modestly believes) would embrace his dream of New Peace. It “replaces the castle in the sky of formal peace with the tent on the ground of a de facto peace.” Palestinians, motivated by “interdependence and mutual economic interests,” will relinquish their unremitting hostility to “the very concepts of Jewish people and Jewish sovereignty.” For Shavit, the (briefly) disillusioned realist, Peace Now just takes a little longer.

Jerold S. Auerbach is author of the newly published Jewish State/Pariah Nation: Israel and the Dilemmas of Legitimacy (Quid Pro Books).

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • David

    He should read Robin Shepherd’s book “A State Beyond the Pale” which presents simply and clearly the arabs own culpability for the current situation.

  • Jerry G

    Ari Shavit’s pronouncements on how to achieve peace sound like the ravings of a lunatic. How is it possible that there are so many others who think the way he does?

    • Fred

      Shavit and leftists in the media and public eye, like him, will never give up on their fantasy, for one simple reason. The rich anti-semites of the world, the EU and it’s leaders, and others keep throwing money at them. Many times it’s big money under the table or to one of their NGO’s, charities and wherever else than can hide it from the Israeli tax authorities. Why would any self-righteous liberal want to give that up?

  • Goodie

    I don’t know about “Sissyphus”. I would have thought more like Syphilis – an unspeakable disease you may actually get from a lover! Israel loves the US and, deep down, I believe the US loves Israel, so what has Israel done to deserve being visited by a pox named Kerry?

    • Ron Blower

      (I looked around and took a poll) It wasn’t us!!

  • Dr.M.Otero

    I suspect that an honest, long view of the Holocaust will see one historic continuity: the flight of 850,000 Mizrahi Jews from ten Muslim countries following the Goebbels/Husseiny anti-Jewish radio incitements to North Africa after 1941. It’s all of one piece. Those Mizrahi Jews and their descendants now constitute half of today’s Israeli Jews and are refugees no less than the Palestinian Arabs. How do we get justice for the Mizrahis and their expropriated lands reputed variously as three or four times the size of Israel?

  • Henry

    Maybe he finally read Caroline Glick’s book.
    A one-state plan for peace in the middle east.
    “The Israeli Solution”
    If not he should ..
    Palestinians have refused every offer for many years.

  • Terry

    The Israeli Left is mentally deranged, they’re like a bizarre cult of fanatics, oblivious to reality, intellectually dishonest, impervious to facts & experience.

    • Ron Blower

      As opposed to the Left in the EU, UK, USA et al??

  • `Bob J

    It shows how liberal the “liberals” are – no deviating from the party line.

  • Debra Michels

    Wow – I thought he finally got it and now he lost it again, sigh…

    I wish people would stand by Jews the way they do when someone like Donald Sterling makes remarks against people of color.

    I think it’s an absolute disgrace that religions – Christianity and Islam – make it so that hating Jews is okay.

    Catholicism (Vatican II) and Lutherans have vowed to change.

    Maybe someday Christians will tell the Muslim world how wrong Christians were, how guilty and ashamed they feel about the part their attitudes and behaviors played, in the Holocaust.

    And stand by us Jews and demand that Islam change its attitudes, too!

    • Ron Blower

      Not NEARLY all “Christians” agree with the Stakeholder of anti-Jewishness, the Catholic organization and its affiliates!!

      For people such as myself, you utter an undeserved libel AND one with which our actions disprove.

      You, and others like you, sound as mean-spirited as any Muslim I’ve contended with.

  • rachel robinson

    I can see that Mr. Shavit is a fast learner. It took him only twenty years to realize who he is dealing with. I hope he also knows how to count to twernty.

  • esther noodelman

    It sounds as if Ari Shavit,who for a week or so,finally seemed to “get it” ,must have had a long talk with Shimon Peres who must have helped him see the light again and spew the same old stuff.“

  • NCS

    when pigs fly

  • Mickey Oberman

    Shavit can Shuvit.

    • Kenneth D Hegler

      Oh, have pigs now become kosher?

      Makes one wonder if Shavit has either “seen a light” the rest of us are unaware of or is he still wandering around the Sinai as in days of old, looking for the Promised Land? BTW, that was all of the land west of the Jordan.

      Again, will start looking for pork in the trees!