Sunday, June 26th | 28 Sivan 5782

May 9, 2014 7:37 am

Richard Falk’s Gone, But Don’t Expect Change at the UN

avatar by Anne Bayefsky


Richard Falk, the special rapporteur for the Palestinian territories with the U.N. Human Rights Council. Photo: U.N. Watch.

For over a month, the U.N.’s top human rights body has been struggling with a major dilemma. How much prior Israel-bashing experience is necessary to be appointed U.N. “independent expert” on Israel?

On Wednesday we found out. Indonesian Makarim Wibisono has just the right mix of confirmed anti-Israel bias and diplomatic cover to replace outgoing U.N. “expert” Richard Falk.

Falk was a notorious anti-Semite, infamous 9/11 conspiracy theorist, and Boston Marathon apologist. But at the U.N., a six-year time limit forced his retirement — and not a matter of principle.

Former Indonesian U.N. ambassador Wibisono is from a country that does not recognize Israel’s right to exist. He served as the president of the U.N. Human Rights Commission in its last year of operation in 2005 – a body that even U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said “cast a shadow on the reputation of the United Nations system as a whole.”

Related coverage

June 26, 2022 3:23 pm

The ‘Judensau,’ Then and Now – Two major news stories to hit the headlines in Germany this month focused rather strikingly on negative depictions...

In a 2006 statement to the new Human Rights Council, Wibisono, described Israel as showing “ruthless contempt for the lives of the innocent,” and perpetrating “callous attacks against terrorized and defenseless civilians.”

A biography says that until January 2014 (and his application for the job) he was “active in the private sector as an advisor to the Third World Network.”

That NGO spews out hysterical anti-Semitic vitriol – such as Israel is guilty of “bestiality, barbarity,” AIPAC pays “cash and other perks” for “towing the Zionist line,” and “the US plays the role of God in modern times” holding “back the sun to enable Israel…to finish the job” against its Arab victims.

And there’s more. Wibisono’s appointment was part of larger deal, because the U.N. Human Rights Council had 19 openings for the job of U.N. human rights expert or “special rapporteur” on a variety of subjects.

Wibisono was not the top anti-Israel choice of Arab and Islamic countries. So at the same time as Wibisono got the nod, someone who had been slated to become the U.N. independent expert on the human rights of older persons was suddenly denied the post. Who was he? Internationally-renowned Israeli professor of gerontology, Israel Doron.

And there’s still more. Richard Falk lives to see another day. His wife and close professional “collaborator” – to use his word – Hilal Elver will become U.N. Special Rapporteur on the right to food.

Notwithstanding the generic title, as have past U.N. incumbents in this particular position, Elver can be counted upon to spend her time Israel-bashing from her new U.N. perch. Elver’s writing circles right back to Falk, including references to the “Jewish lobby” and admiration for 9/11 conspiracy fans.

These U.N. jobs matter. Though they do not carry a salary, they do involve other perks: expenses, travel, status and most important an instant global platform as the world’s leading “expert” on the human rights subject at hand.

That is why Arab and Islamic states fight so hard to ensure anti-Israel discrimination is embedded into the system. An allegedly independent guru on human rights is a potent weapon in a systematic campaign to use lethal politics to destroy the Jewish state.

The sordid background to the appointment of Wibisono indicates how much better America’s enemies play the U.N. game than the State Department.

In the case of the Israel rapporteur position, there were ten candidates. A consultative committee of five states, geographically representative, produced a short-list and ranked Christina Cerna first. She was an international human rights lawyer with no known political views on the Arab-Israeli conflict. So the Arab and Islamic groups of states formally objected to Cerna on the grounds that she did not have the “relevant experience.”

The Arab group then put forward extremist Christine Chinkin as the candidate “with the relevant experience.” Chinkin’s “relevant” expertise included her prior membership on the infamous U.N. Goldstone committee, which declared that Israel deliberately intended to murder Palestinian civilians rather than act in self-defense against eight years of Hamas rocket attacks.

The Arab and Islamic choice was initially supported by the president of the U.N. Human Rights Council – who just happens to be from Gabon, a member of the Islamic group. When he ran into opposition, he chose Wibisono instead. His selection is to be confirmed by the Council on Thursday.

Wibisono then emerges as the laughable “compromise.”

In fact, no U.N. rapporteur on Israel could be independent. The 1993 U.N. job description says the mandate holder must investigate only Israel’s human rights violations. Investigating Palestinians is off limits.

The next “independent” “unbiased” UN human rights report on Israel, coming up.

Anne Bayefsky is director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust. Follow her @AnneBayefsky. This article was originally published by FOX News.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.