Tuesday, March 20th | 4 Nisan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

November 28, 2014 10:57 am

Is Palestinian Terror Really Part of a Cycle of Violence?

avatar by Alex Margolin

Email a copy of "Is Palestinian Terror Really Part of a Cycle of Violence?" to a friend
The Temple Mount atop Jerusalem's Old City. Photo: Dave Bender

The Temple Mount atop Jerusalem's Old City. Photo: Dave Bender

An emerging narrative about the current outbreak of Palestinian violence – which now includes a massacre of Jewish worshipers in a Jerusalem synagogue – is that it’s all part of a “cycle of violence.”

“A new cycle of violence has started, with no prospect of an end in the foreseeable future,” proclaimed The Independent in an editorial following the massacre.

“The distinction this time,” the paragraph continues, “is that the attack appears to be linked to pressure from ultra-Orthodox Jews to be allowed to pray at the site known to them as Temple Mount – which Muslims believe is the place where the Prophet Mohamed ascended to heaven.”

In other words, Jews demand the right to pray at their holy place and the Palestinians respond with a slaughter of Jews at prayer. And that, for The Independent, is a cycle of violence. The Israeli demand and the Palestinian terror are apparently both acts of violence in a cycle.

The Telegraph also calls it a cycle of violence, and describes it this way:

After Israel captured Jerusalem in the Six Day War, Muslim authority was allowed to continue on the Temple Mount, leading to a ban on Jewish worship there. Increasing numbers of activists ascended to the Temple Mount to pray, including Israeli parliamentarians. This contemporary challenge to the status quo by Israel’s far-Right drove instability throughout Jerusalem.

Tensions escalated in October with the shooting of Yehuda Glick, an advocate of Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount. Disorder was beginning to spill over from east Jerusalem into west Jerusalem.

Overnight, Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount blossomed from a fringe issue – mainstream Orthodox Judaism forbids prayer there – to a burning political question of freedom of religion. This poured fuel on the flames of already-escalating violence.

Again, there is Palestinian violence  – the shooting of Yehuda Glick. And there is the Israel part – Jews turning “prayer on the Temple Mount” into “a burning political question of freedom of religion.” And that’s what poured fuel on the fire.

Besides being factually wrong, the media’s insistence that what’s happening is a cycle of violence – rather than a barrage of Palestinian terror – carries a moral failure. If there is a cycle, then both sides are equally guilty.

And if both sides are equally guilty, then the brutality of the Palestinian attack is mitigated. There is no reason to call out the Palestinians for ongoing attacks…because it’s all a legitimate response for something those Israelis are doing.

The cycle of violence narrative obscures the reality of the situation and limits the power of the international community to intervene to calm tensions. It also negates the possibility that an attack like the one on the Har Nof synagogue is a case of unprovoked violence. If the violence is unprovoked, it can’t be part of a cycle.

Therefore, everything Israel does is called an act of violence, even if it’s self-defense, retaliation for unprovoked violence, or even a call for freedom to pray at Jewish holy sites.

This article was originally published by HonestReporting.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Darren

    If Jordan scuttles their peace agreement with Israel, then all “Palestinians” should be forcibly deported to Jordan. Jordan can be the “Palestinian” state — it already is: over 60% of their population RIGHT NOW is “Palestinian”!

  • Asher B. Garber

    The real cycle is the Cycle of Stupidity.

    1. Palestinians attack Jews.
    2. Media reports (in a way) the attack on Jews.
    3. Media runs editorials breaking down the attack on Jews.
    3a. If it’s in the LA Times, then the editorial is written by Hamas!
    4. Israel responds by arresting those involved and/or finding ways to stop the violence (war, wall, whatever)
    5. Media really flips out!111!
    6. Palestinians attack Jews. Because now they have a reason.
    7. Media reports, and so it goes…..

  • yosef shomron

    You deserve credit for dispelling the term “cycle of violence” in reference to arab attacks on Jews in Israel. As you point out, there’s no equivocating between Arab terror attacks on Jews and Israeli police/military response to safeguard human life.

  • Robert Davis

    The day israelis and their government UNDERSTAND the only way out of this violence,Israel bashing,harassing etc is to EXPEL all arabs (except a few good israeli citizens such as druze and christian arabs)from Western Palestine,peace will come to Israel and probably part of Mid East,peace with neighboring States and Israel will get and deserve respect of the whole world. Their present cowardly and stupid anti-political attitude,what with negociations with fake palestinians trying to steal jews’ identity etc. is arch stupid,non productive and give a counter productive message to the whole world.

  • Mickey Oberman

    Cycles come and go.

    Islamic violence and terror is a permanent fixture of Islam.
    It never ceases. Like ebola it spreads its evil world wide.

    Mickey Oberman