Tuesday, May 23rd | 27 Iyyar 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
December 9, 2014 4:18 pm

Israeli Watchdog: Amnesty International Gaza Report Uses Flawed Methodology to Buttress War Crimes Accusations Against IDF

avatar by Ben Cohen

Email a copy of "Israeli Watchdog: Amnesty International Gaza Report Uses Flawed Methodology to Buttress War Crimes Accusations Against IDF" to a friend

Amnesty International's latest report accusing Israel of "war crimes" is based on flawed methodology, NGO Monitor says. Photo: Screenshot

Israeli watchdog NGO Monitor has blasted the latest Amnesty International report on Israel’s war against Hamas during the summer of 2014 for “fundamental failures” in its research methodology.

“By Amnesty’s own admission, its methodology in Gaza is faulty and incomplete,” Professor Gerald Steinberg, president of NGO Monitor, said in a statement. “The ‘evidence’ is internally contradictory, and cannot sustain the accusations of ‘war crimes’ and the recommendations of legal warfare and sanctions against Israel.”

The Amnesty report, entitled “‘Nothing is Immune’: Israel’s Destruction of Landmark Buildings in Gaza,” concentrates on four strikes carried out by Israeli forces during the last four days of Operation Protective Edge and accuses the IDF of having carried out “war crimes.”

Related coverage

May 23, 2017 12:14 pm
0

In Surprise, Israeli City of Netanya Set to Host 2018 World Lacrosse Championships

JNS.org - Miriam Feirberg-Ikar, mayor of the Israeli city of Netanya, and Israel Lacrosse Association (ILA) Chairman Scott Neiss announced...

“While no one was killed, the attacks are of great significance because they are examples of what appears to have been deliberate destruction and targeting of civilian buildings and property on a large scale, carried out without military necessity,” the preamble to the report declared.

Citing one example of the contradictions in the report, NGO Monitor pointed out that “Amnesty writes that Israeli authorities indicated that ‘one of the destroyed buildings housed a Hamas command centre and of facilities linked to Palestinian militants in another.’ But Amnesty then claims that there is ‘no information as to why they levelled four entire buildings’ and that there was ‘no military justification’ for the strikes.”

Steinberg added that since Amnesty has had no access to Gaza since before the conflict began, there “is no way to confirm the requisite expertise and impartiality of these consultants, particularly in a territory controlled by Hamas.”

“The individuals who determine Amnesty’s Israel activities reflect a highly ideological agenda, as demonstrated in our research,” Steinberg emphasized.

Defending his organization’s report, Amnesty’s Middle East and North Africa director Philip Luther said: “Both the facts on the ground and statements made by Israeli military spokespeople at the time indicate that the attacks were a collective punishment against the people of Gaza and were designed to destroy their already precarious livelihoods.”

NGO Monitor has consistently highlighted what it says are the mistakes and distortions in Amnesty’s assessment of the Gaza conflict. At the height of the fighting in July, the watchdog took aim at “Amnesty’s silence on Hamas’ exploitation of UNRWA and other civilian structures by Hamas to store and fire rockets and conduct Palestinian military operations; feigning of ignorance as to Hamas’ shielding itself among the civilian population of Gaza; and claiming that Hamas directives to ignore warnings of impending attacks were in order to avoid “panic” among the civilian population.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • This article is an eye opener
    clearing many aspects of what happened
    Originally , I was reading the BBC Persian,
    it is talking of a clear case not only ” war crime”
    but also clear case “crime against humanity”
    this web site, which is Farsi version of BBC
    is extremely anti Israel
    though carrying a name of ” …an European unbiased journalism …” !!!
    this is the link, for those who want the evidence
    http://www.bbc.com/persian/world/2015/07/150729_l45_amnesty_gaza_war_crime

  • ken brownsher

    Muslims are allowed to kill with impunity! Why? because of the terror they will bring to their host countries.It is sad to say but the European Right Wing may yet save Europe.Europe has led the charge against Israel because they see America as weak in supporting their ally.Under Obama Israel has been the whipping boy.

    When is the last time a democracy was subjected to world rebuke for defending itself! Thanks Europe for being an Amoral cesspool overrun by Muslims who hate your culture.In the end Charles Martel was defeated.

  • amnesty int’l is notoriously bias against Israel, was it not HAMAS’ indiscriminate firing rockets into Israel not a war crime? the targeting of civilian airport not a war crime? where is the stinking AI report on that? those assholes in this wicked devil’s attorney should shut their mouths.

  • Mike P.

    Truth is stranger than fiction!

    The report’s author’s family name is Luther!

    Like the genocide-advocating anti-Semite from the Middle Ages, Martin Luther, who was one of Hitler’s genocidal inspirations, and today is unconscientiously idolized by many millions.

  • CSBG

    Why doesn’t Israel do investigations and reports on these vile, anti-Semitic organizations and release them with its own narrative?

  • Shalom-Hillel

    It’s “the narrative” again. Anything that can be construed to defame Israel goes into the report.

  • E Pluribus Wombat

    AI wrote the report in 2013 and pulled it off the shelf, slapped a new cover sheet on it and proceeded, like they always do.

Algemeiner.com