Sunday, May 28th | 3 Sivan 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
February 13, 2015 10:53 am

President of Equivocation and Evasion

avatar by Jerold Auerbach

Email a copy of "President of Equivocation and Evasion" to a friend

President Barack Obama arrives at Port Columbus International Airport. Photo: White House.

President Obama’s bouts of equivocation and evasion are worrisome. Even The New York Times, not inclined to editorialize in its news columns except when Israel is the target, noticed. Its page 1 headline (February 12), “A Dual View of War Power,” alerted readers to presidential confusion. Finally seeking authorization for a military campaign against Islamic State terrorists, he simultaneously requested Congressional restrictions on his power as commander in chief to wage that campaign.

Times reporter Peter Baker noted the “essential contradiction” in the President’s proposal. Even as Obama “proposed some handcuffs on his power, he left behind the keys to those shackles should he or his successors decide they are too confining.” Puzzled members of Congress debated whether Obama had set overly confining limitations (Republicans), or proposed “virtually unfettered” powers (Democrats). Their confusion was understandable. As the president himself declared: “We need flexibility but we also have to be careful and deliberate.” More succinctly, the  Wall Street Journal lead editorial that same day, entitled “The War Irresolution,” referred to it as “the President Gulliver resolution”: “Tie me down Congress, please.”

Had this been the only recent demonstration of presidential equivocation, evasion and denial, dayenu. But it was preceded only days earlier by a gaffe that made him seem decisive by comparison as the almost-commander in chief. It began with his Vox TV interview when he declared (unequivocally) that the recent Islamist terrorist attack (words the president cannot enunciate) that resulted in the murder of four Jews in the Hyper Cacher kosher market in Paris was the “random” shooting of “a bunch of folks in a deli.” This came after Amedy Coulibaly, the Muslim killer, declared that he had targeted shoppers there “because they were Jewish.”

Related coverage

May 26, 2017 12:03 pm
0

From Greeley, Colorado to Manchester, England

JNS.org - For those -- like me -- who’d never really given any thought to singer Ariana Grande before the terrorist atrocity at her concert...

President Obama’s refusal to identify (Muslim) “terrorist” or (Jewish) victim reached appalling depths of absurdity at press conferences conducted by White House spokesman Josh Earnest and State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki. Doubtlessly tutored by their commander in chief, they displayed a truly remarkable inability to confront the reality that he had despicably evaded.

Earnest was asked by ABC’s Jonathan Karl whether Obama doubted that shoppers in the kosher market were targeted because they were Jews. He responded: “The adverb that the president chose was used to indicate that the individuals who were killed in that terrible, tragic incident were killed not because of who they were but because of where they randomly happened to be. These individuals were not targeted by name.” Karl, appropriately astonished, asked: “Not by name, but by religion, were they not?” Earnest replied (as if he knew): “There were people other than just Jews who were in that deli.” No doubt Earnest, like his boss, had carefully calculated the number of non-Jewish shoppers in the kosher market only a few hours prior to the Jewish Sabbath before referring to them as “folks” or “people.”

Psaki, equally inept, was asked by AP diplomatic reporter Matt Lee whether “the administration really believe that the victims of this attack were not singled out because they were of a particular faith?” Psaki answered: “I believe if I remember the victims specifically, they were not all victims of one background or one nationality.” Questioned further whether the Obama administration “believe this was an anti-Jewish attack on a Jewish community in Paris,” the hapless Psaki could only respond: “I don’t think we’re going to speak on behalf of French authorities and what they believe was the situation.”

Excoriated for their ludicrous responses, Earnest and Psaki  turned to Twitter for self-exculpation – and, finally, truth-telling. Earnest: the “terror attack at Paris Kosher market was motivated by anti-Semitism” and Obama “didn’t intend to suggest otherwise” – even if he did. Psaki: it had “always been clear that the attack on the kosher grocery store was an anti-semitic attack.”

Why, asked Arutz-7 journalist Ari Soffer (February 11), was the Obama administration “trying so hard to play down the anti-Semitic nature of the attack?” That question will surely tempt  historians and psychiatrists alike. Some analysts may want to begin with President Obama’s relationship with his anti-Semitic former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Others surely will explore his venomous relationship with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, currently played out in advance of the Israeli leader’s address to Congress next month. Surprise: no presidential equivocation there.

Jerold S. Auerbach is a frequent contributor to The Algemeiner

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Fritz Kohlhaas

    Obama is evil personified!

  • It amazes me that no one seems to realize that at last count Obama had inserted no less than 7 members of the Muslim Brotherhood in positions in America’s Homeland Security and taken with the fact that Valerie Jarrett who is his key adviser also hails from Iran and whose family was involved in the formation of the Muslim Brotherhood that just maybe he doesn’t want to “offend” either them or their cohorts might just play into this drama of “cloak and dagger” that is being played out on America in an effort to undermine the Constitution and all that made America great.

  • steven L

    Our President, the 1st Islamic President.

  • Fred

    Obama has proven himself a most incompetent President, to whom the friends are the enemy and the enemy are the friends. He is most protective to the extreme Islamist & Iran fearing as a Muslim that he may be threatened with a fatwa. He goes belly up to excuse the worst Islamic atrocities, a most incredible deed ,but let Israel build a toilet he comes out in a furious rage.

  • Yale

    When spokemen for Richard Nixon engaged in similar prevarication during Watergate, the media were all over them. The situation pushed the Doonesbury series into prominence.

    Where are those people today? Are the would-be heirs to Gary Trudeau quivering in fear due to Charlie Hebdo?

  • edward bowman

    The whole of the Middle East is on fire. Guess who is to blame

    • zbrk

      Why don’t you tell us?

    • David Katz

      ISIS?

Algemeiner.com