Thursday, May 25th | 29 Iyyar 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
June 24, 2015 2:29 pm

The Blowback From the Oren Revelations

avatar by Isi Leibler

Email a copy of "The Blowback From the Oren Revelations" to a friend
Michael Oren's memoir enraged the Obama administration and polarized a situation within the American Jewish community. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Michael Oren’s memoir enraged the Obama administration and polarized the American Jewish community. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

The fierce reactions to Kulanu MK and former Ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren’s evaluation of the Obama administration in his new book, and in particular to three articles he penned titled “How Obama abandoned Israel,” “Why Obama is wrong about Iran being ‘rational’ on nukes” and “How Obama opened his heart to the ‘Muslim world,” were predictable. He has enraged the administration, created enormous anxiety and polarized a situation within the American Jewish community.

Publication coincided with the U.S. Supreme Court upholding the administration’s right to overrule a bipartisan congressional decision that required the State Department to allow U.S. citizens born in Jerusalem to designate on their passports that they were born in Israel. Instead, the administration is able to perpetuate its practice of refusing to recognize that the capital Jerusalem is an integral part of Israel.

Oren released his book – already on Amazon’s bestseller list – earlier than scheduled (click here for Amazon link). He hoped that it would impact on Congress and strengthen its resolve if, as appears likely, President Barack Obama continues his path of capitulation toward Iran. Left unblocked, this path will enable Iran – the most dangerous global terrorist entity in the world, which makes no secret of its determination to wipe Israel off the face of the earth – to emerge as a nuclear-armed power.

Related coverage

September 19, 2016 6:32 am
0

Israel Is High on Medical Marijuana

JNS.org - Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes Israeli entrepreneurs succeed because they challenge authority, question everything and don’t play by the rules. “The...

The decision by Oren to express his damning evaluation of the nature and motivations of Obama’s diplomatic abandonment of Israel, without inhibitions, stunned all who had either been engaged or followed events in the Middle East. Until now, much of what Oren outlined has been discussed quietly in Jewish quarters, but by and large, the community’s leaders preferred to bury their heads in the sand and declined to publicly express their apprehensions.

Oren made it clear that Obama maintained and even strengthened the defense relationship with Israel. But, notwithstanding a few exceptions such as statements he made at the United Nations and during his visit to Israel, from the day of his inauguration he systematically pursued his objective to create daylight between Israel and the United States in order to build bridges with the Islamic world. Oren stressed that while “nobody has a monopoly on making mistakes” and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as well as Obama made mistakes, it was Obama who deliberately acted to weaken and “jettison” the relationship.

Oren cites chapter and verse of Obama’s humiliation of Netanyahu and his double standards in continuing to condemn Israel and not even once confront the PA and Abbas, thus reinforcing Palestinian extremism and encouraging their intransigency and refusal to compromise. He points to Obama’s use of the word “appalling” in reference to Israel’s activity in the last Gaza war, and his chilling delay of arms shipments to the IDF during the war.

He notes that Obama does not even accuse those who perpetrated the murderous attack on the kosher delicatessen in Paris of engaging in antisemitism, preferring to condemn them as “vicious zealots who … randomly shot a bunch of folks in a deli.” In his Foreign Policy article, Oren speculates that Obama’s abandonment by his mother’s Muslim husbands prompted him in his later life to seek acceptance from their coreligionists.

The response from the administration was, predictably, one of outrage. There were demands for apologies and Dan Shapiro, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, who effectively called Oren a liar, requested Netanyahu to condemn and dissociate himself from the remarks. The prime minister’s response was that Oren was not speaking on behalf of the government and that he did not intend to comment.

Netanyahu has been treated far more shabbily by Obama and his administration than any leader of a rogue state. Only a few months ago, he was described as “chickenshit” by senior personnel, and former senior peace negotiator Ambassador Martin Indyk has repeatedly slandered and debased him. However, at no stage did we hear any repudiation by Obama of these constant vile attacks on a purported ally.

Under pressure from Shapiro, some ministers dissociated themselves and even condemned Oren. Finance Minister Moshe Kahlon, the head of Oren’s Kulanu party, criticized Oren and perhaps went overboard when he reaffirmed his “sincere appreciation for President Obama’s efforts to stand by Israel and defend its interests.” There was also criticism from Public Security and Strategic Affairs Minister Gilad Erdan and Deputy Foreign Minister Tzipi Hotovely.

Although the administration has bitterly condemned Oren and accused him of distorting reality, there has been a distinct absence of articles refuting him – for the simple reason that the facts he presented cannot be denied. In fact, Democrat Alan Dershowitz has explicitly endorsed Oren’s view that the Obama administration deliberately sought to damage the relationship between the U.S. and Israel.

Needless to say, the liberals are now up in arms, shrieking against an ambassador whom they admired and considered had been appointed to the post because of his liberal inclinations. He published articles in the left-wing media and the liberal Jewish weekly The Forward named him as one of the five most influential American Jews in the world. He campaigned vigorously against Netanyahu before the election. Even now he expresses the hope that Hillary Clinton will be elected as the next U.S. president. It is therefore impossible to write him off as a right-winger.

The most consistent rebuttal of Oren by the administration and liberals are pathetic attempts to personally besmirch him as a hedonist and opportunist willing to sell his soul to promote sales of his book to conservative Republicans who despise their president.

The greatest impact, which has yet to be fully assessed, is within the Jewish community. Oren does not mince words about his abhorrence with the manner in which certain Jewish “liberals” in the administration and media, such as Thomas Friedman and Leon Wieseltier, have goaded Obama to toughen his attitude toward Israel.

I predict that when the dust settles, nothing will change with the far-Left liberals whose veneration of Obama is almost messianic. But among more open-minded pro-Israel Democrats, Oren is likely to have a profound impact and will hopefully encourage some of them to review their position. The conservatives will of course claim that they were always on the right side of the angels and that Oren is merely stating what they have been saying for years.

What is more important is what impact Oren’s public revelations will have on the Jewish leaders. Many of them are deeply distressed by Oren’s outbursts. As of now, aside from the Anti-Defamation League’s retiring chief, Abe Foxman, dismissing Oren’s views as “conspiracy theories with an element of pseudo psychoanalysis,” little is being publicly said, but there is undoubtedly intense discussion taking place behind the scenes.

Many claim that this will drive the administration into a frenzy and intensify the anti-Israeli diplomatic moves. There is a case for this attitude but surely – especially in light of the additional revelations by Oren – quietly sitting on the sidelines has proven to be and remains the wrong approach. Now albeit belatedly, is the time to speak up, promoting the case for Israel and respectfully, honestly and publicly rebutting Obama’s distorted and one-sided approach.

Hopefully it will strengthen and unite the committed Jewish community, and it may even have a major positive impact on Congress as the Iranian capitulation policy comes to a head. For many Americans and congressmen the revelations of Oren will come as a shock to them.

It is too early to tell, but Oren’s intervention may have long-term positive repercussions impacting on the balance of Obama’s term of office as well as long-standing American policy. We can only pray that will be the outcome.

This article was originally published by The Jerusalem Post and Israel Hayom.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Yoel Nitzarim

    From my tiny apartment in Ramot Bet, Jerusalem, I have already stated in many readers’ letter that I aver Barack Obama’s presidency to be historically considered the worst in modern times if not the worst in the history of the United States of America. He has continually taken his appeasement strategy to undermine American involvement in worldly affairs. His domestic policy has helped further ruin the US chances to recover from an incredibly immense deficit. America is globally perceived as a “has-been” leader, as a former superpower, as a “washed-up” failure by most of the countries in the Free World. This Iranian debacle so to happen will be Obama’s eternal-infernal legacy to the entire world, for if it passes through the hands of the powers to be, it will cause havoc which quite possibly will lead to a third world war. As for the Jewish community in America, after having live in the States for sixty years, my take on it is one of quiet desperation. It is like a carbon copy of several million Daniel Shapiros in my mind: pathetic, soft-hearted, compromised Jews rather unsure of their ties with the modern Jewish state.Michael Oren is a genuine Jewish hero for today and tomorrow. He should be commended again and again for his openness, his honesty, and his courage to speak the truth in the face of power. His mentor, and mine, Eliezer Wiesel, respectively one of our chief sources of wisdom, friendship, and truth-seeking, must surely be proud of his true show of intrepidity in exposing himself as a man whose message sincerely expresses the audacity of hope in humane letters.

  • Genghis Cohen

    Let us begin where US war against the Middle East started, and where Jewish Liberals first recoiled against it, even though the war was believed necessary on the grounds that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Jewish Liberals could not tolerate George W. Bush, (an ugh Republican) so although Saddam had 550 metric tonnes of yellowcake uranium out of which to make weapons-grade bombs, the verdict of all liberal intelligentsia was to condemn the Bush war. Now fast forward seven years. Liberal democrats, including those of the Jewish variety, still believe that weapons of mass-destruction in Iranian hands are not only to be shunned by warfare, but with sanctions as well. What ever Ayatollah wants, Ayatollah gets. It’s in the Koran.

  • When I try to look at Middle East diplomacy objectively (i.e. not from the perspective of an Israeli) I’ve always wondered whether on a certain level Obama’s strategy was defensible: Ratchet up the rhetoric against Israel, so that the Arab world hears loud and clear, while at the same time continuing to support Israel, materially and without fanfare.

    The goal — to gain the support of moderate Arabs and sway more Muslims to their side. Obama is an idealist (perhaps a naive idealist) who doesn’t like to brand people as wicked, preferring to think if you just figure out how to sweet-talk them, they will eventually come around.

    • dante

      Ben, stop dreaming or “wondering” and read Oren’s book.

      your conjecture is woefully wide of the mark. as Oren said, if one demonstrates his differences with Israel, it weakens Israel and strengthen her enemies as it engenders the contempt of these same enemies.

      but, Ben, obama has succeeded in bringing some Arab states closer to Israel…but that is only because they are as alarmed by American submission to the mullahs as Israel is.

  • Shalom Freedman

    Anyone who cares for the future security of Israel must be deeply concerned by the Oren revelations. They confirm what many people already sensed. They simply provide more evidence from inside.
    The question of how something can be done now when the Obama Administration is about to strengthen the major terrorist state in the world, and open the way for it to have a long- term nuclear arms industry is not clear. Obama may yet make another major move to abandon Israel, this at the U.N.
    It is to be wished that major American Jewish leaders would have the courage to confront the President, even if they get only rebuke for doing so.

  • Robert.Weintraub

    There has been no discernible change in Jewish attitudes toward the administration as a result of Oren’s book nor is there likely
    to be any. Fortunately, demographics are changing as the more conservative Orthodox are increasing while the more liberal Jewish eculars are declining. However, the movement is painfully slow.

  • zadimel

    Where is the third reply?

    • zadimel

      Thanks!

  • Michael Oren:

    “Finally, after many months of attentiveness, I reached my conclusion. In the absence of a high-profile provocation – an attack on a U.S. aircraft carrier, for example – the United States would not use force against Iran. Rather, the administration would remain committed to diplomatically resolving the Iranian nuclear issue, even at the risk of reaching a deal unacceptable to Israel. And If Israel took matters into its own hands, the White House would keep its distance and offer to defend Israel only if it were counterstruck by a hundred thousand Hezbollah missiles.”

    The reason Michael Oren wrote Ally
    http://www.madisdead.blogspot.co.il/2015/06/the-reason-michael-oren-wrote-ally.html

  • EC

    people will do anything to make a few bucks, even someone that as respectable, polished, accomplished as Amb. Oren. he did not have to “go there” to sell this story, but he did. for reasons, he will eventually regret..I assure you

    • theo

      E C, you should ask yourself : Are the charges denied or are they not ? Are there serious consequences to Obama’s treatment of Israel or are there not ?
      Oren’s revelations ,like Netanyahu’s address to Congress can avert serious consequences for Israel
      The American electorate must know the truth about their leader, no matter how unpalatable this may be Obama has decided Israel – America’s most dependable ally in the Middle East – is expendable
      Israel’s wellbeing is on the line
      That is the crux and nothing else

    • Uncle Sam

      Again you may not like what he has to say, but can you refute his evidence?

    • dante

      your tb here says more about you and what animates you than it does about Oren.

      if you knew anything about Oren, you would have known that he did not write the book for money.

      you don’t know anything about Oren. you don’t know anything about the issue. you don’t know anything, but that doesn’t bother you; you have your opinions and the facts don’t matter, do they?

  • Mike P.

    The reaction of the American Jewish establishment is bone-chilling verification of Oren’s hypothesis…their silence, and eventual condemnations of Oren actually reflect their fear of Obama’s intentions and revenge.

    Welcome back to the era of the Court Jew. Better say the prayer in the siddur reserved for kings next time King Obama appears before you. This may temper his wrath, let us imagine.

Algemeiner.com