Sunday, May 28th | 3 Sivan 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
July 23, 2015 5:24 pm

Iran Reiterates Nuclear Red Lines: No Permanent Limits, No Extension of Deal, No Inspections of Military Sites

avatar by David Daoud

Email a copy of "Iran Reiterates Nuclear Red Lines: No Permanent Limits, No Extension of Deal, No Inspections of Military Sites" to a friend
Iran has once again reiterated red lines, rejecting limitations on its nuclear program. PHOTO: OpposingViews.

Iran has once again reiterated its red lines, rejecting limitations on its nuclear program. PHOTO: OpposingViews.

Iran on Tuesday rejected Western interpretations of the nuclear deal with world powers inked earlier this month, reiterating its opposition to the extension of the deal, any permanent limitations on its nuclear program, and inspections of non-nuclear military sites, Lebanon-based As-Safir reported.

According to the report, Iran ruled out any new or resumed nuclear related sanctions after the provisions of the deal negotiated in Vienna expire 10 years after implementation.

It also rejected inspections at non-nuclear military sites by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), declaring at the same time that it would open four new nuclear sites, two of which will become operational this year.

Related coverage

May 27, 2017 1:30 pm
0

UN Warns of ‘Walking Into Another Gaza Crisis With Eyes Wide Open’

The United Nations Middle East envoy warned the Security Council on Friday that a power struggle between the rival Palestinian...

Earlier this week, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif also said that Tehran’s continued production and use of ballistic missiles would not violate the nuclear agreement.

“Using the ballistic missiles doesn’t violate the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action” and Iran is not bound by any U.N. resolutions to restrict its ballistic missile program, Zarif said in response to questions by legislators in an open session of Iran’s parliament, the Majlis, on Tuesday.

“This paragraph [of the annex] speaks about missiles with nuclear warheads capability and since we don’t design any of our missiles for carrying nuclear weapons, therefore, this paragraph is not related to us at all,” he claimed.

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi reiterated the point on Wednesday, saying that the resolutions only ban missile production for carrying nuclear payloads. Since, he claimed, none of Iran’s missiles have been designed for nukes, the country’s entire missile program is out of bounds for the Security Council.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • eduardoN

    As the Iranians declare, nothing is related to anything if they don’t like it.
    The president and the secretary of state, should have learned not to be rich American tourist, and bargain or simply walk away is the price is not right.

  • Steve

    What are the reason is there for intercontinental ballistic missile’s

  • Jaque Buaer

    The US has willfully abdicated its responsibilities as the worlds leader. Barack Obama, a Communist revolutionary elected as US President has been weakening US national defense posture from the day he took office. Obamas head negotiator John Kerry was a stooge of the Communist North Vietnamese during the Vietnam War, and campaigned against the US global fight against Communism. Its no wonder that Obama chose Kerry as his front man in the Iran Nuclear negotiations. Obama has set in motion World War 3 by his desires to help arm Iran. Obama is not stupid–he is smart as a fox. We are witness to what can happen we a fox is permitted free reign.

Algemeiner.com