Tuesday, November 21st | 3 Kislev 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
August 6, 2015 11:49 pm

New York Senator Schumer Announces Opposition to Nuclear Deal — ‘Iran Will Not Change’

avatar by Algemeiner Staff

Email a copy of "New York Senator Schumer Announces Opposition to Nuclear Deal — ‘Iran Will Not Change’" to a friend
President Obama and Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer. Photo: Pete Souza/White House.

President Obama and Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer. Photo: Pete Souza/White House.

In a blow to President Obama’s foreign policy agenda, New York’s senior Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer announced his opposition to the Iran nuclear deal in a detailed and lengthy statement late Thursday night.

Weighing three separate aspects of the deal, Schumer, the 3rd highest ranking Democrat, said that on balance he believes a vote against the deal “is the right one.”

Schumer summed up his decision saying it was guided by his belief that “Iran will not change,” and therefore, under the agreement, “will be able to achieve its dual goals of eliminating sanctions while ultimately retaining its nuclear and non-nuclear power.”

Said Schumer, “Better to keep U.S. sanctions in place, strengthen them, enforce secondary sanctions on other nations, and pursue the hard-trodden path of diplomacy once more, difficult as it may be.”

Related coverage

August 29, 2017 5:47 pm
0

US Jewish Groups Praise Tillerson’s Renewal of State Department Antisemitism Envoy

US Jewish groups reacted with praise and relief on Tuesday to the news that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is...

Directly referencing President Obama’s assertion that opponents of the deal were akin to warmongers, the leading lawmaker said his opposition was “not because I believe war is a viable or desirable option, nor to challenge the path of diplomacy.”

U.S. Jewish groups on Thursday applauded the New York Democrat’s stance.

“The timing of Senator Schumer is especially important, in wake of President Obama’s speech wherein he in essence labeled Americans opposing the deal as warmongers and having a similar mindset as ‘death to America’ chanters,” said Simon Wiesenthal Center Associate Dean Rabbi Abraham Cooper. “Senator Schumer is a Democrats’ Democrat and his decision we hope will help open the minds and hearts of all undecided Senators and Congressmen to do the right thing.”

Others, however, were more skeptical of the Senator’s intent and suggested that behind the scenes deal-making had influenced his decision.

“If Schumer does, in fact, come out against the deal, it might mean that the future Dem leader understands that Obama’s victory is secure,” tweeted The Atlantic columnist Jeffrey Goldberg.

Jonah Goldberg, of the National Review, expressed a similar sentiment. “I hope I’m wrong, but my first assumption was that Schumer’s opposition to Iran deal means that Obama has the votes,” he tweeted.

Earlier on Thursday, Schumer’s colleague Senator Kirsten Gillibrand announced her support for the deal while calling it “imperfect,” and New York Congressman Eliot Engel voiced his opposition.

Many Jewish groups in the U.S. have been actively lobbying against the deal, saying it threatens the United States and puts Israel in unacceptable danger.

 

 

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Rachamim

    Big windfall. At last!

  • SteveHC

    I am continually amazed at how far so-called political “journalists” will go to adher to their own bizarre beliefs and “analyses” no matter what the obvious facts and objective reality may point to.

    In this case, Senator Schumer has *repeatedly*, unequivocally and VERY publicly stated that he would take his time to seriously consider the proposed deal with Iran from every conceivable angle and without influence from lobbyists or others’ attempts at internal political dealings. In spite of that, now that Schumer has decided against support of the proposed deal many of those who disagree with his conclusion continue to insist that this must somehow mean that the only reason he announced that decision was because he “knew” that the deal’s failure to pass in Congress will survive presidential veto. Their lack of any genuine common sense is truly unbelievable…

Algemeiner.com