Friday, May 26th | 1 Sivan 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
October 9, 2015 4:06 am

Judaism and Creationism

avatar by Jeremy Rosen

Email a copy of "Judaism and Creationism" to a friend
Objects symbolizing Judaism. Photo: Wikipedia.

Objects symbolizing Judaism. Photo: Wikipedia.

There is a myriad of issues and challenges that we all face every day. Coping with life can be exhausting and exhilarating. But needing to know when exactly the universe or the earth were created is surely not among them. Some people choose to believe it all happened precisely 5776 years ago, either on Rosh Hashanah in the seventh month — or in Nissan, the first month. Others are inclined towards scientific theories that posit a date many millions of years ago.

According to Wikipedia (the easiest, quickest, but not necessarily the least-disputed, source readily available nowadays):

“The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model describing the development of the Universe. Space and time were created in the Big Bang, and these were imbued with a fixed amount of energy and matter; as space expands, the density of that matter and energy decreases. After the initial expansion, the Universe cooled sufficiently to allow the formation first of subatomic particles and later of simple atoms. Giant clouds of these primordial elements later coalesced through gravity to form stars. Assuming that the prevailing model is correct, the age of the Universe is measured to be 13.799±0.021 billion years.”

Related coverage

September 16, 2016 2:04 am
1

Were God Merely to ‘Exist,’ Our Prayers Would Be Meaningless

“God is a circle whose center is everywhere and circumference nowhere,” said Voltaire. Indeed, trying to describe God is like trying to...

Well, you can see how out of date I am, because whereas I wrote above about millions of years, Wikipedia gives it as billions. That’s inflation for you. But notice too how the text says “prevailing cosmological model,” which keeps all options open and is not doctrinaire. It simply means “based on the current evidence” — which might of course change one day, in either direction. When it comes to the age of the earth, the author of another Wikipedia article is a trifle more dogmatic:

“Earth formed around 4.54 billion years ago by accretion from the solar nebula… One very large collision is thought to have been responsible for tilting the Earth at an angle and forming the Moon. Over time, the planet cooled and formed a solid crust, allowing liquid water to exist on the surface.”

All this is important information for anyone who wishes to be up-to-date with current scientific theories. Indeed anyone interested in having a conversation with an educated person nowadays will need to assume that these opinions are the default ones. But that does not stop many apparently intelligent people from believing something altogether different: that the world is only thousands of years old, not billions. I once knew a professor of nuclear physics at King’s College London, no less, who believed, or said he believed, precisely that. Not only him, but almost everyone who calls himself or herself haredi, Chabad, hasidic, not to mention all the significant ba’al teshuva (internal evangelical) movements within Judaism today, also claims to believe that.

Creationists are a breed of people who believe that God created the heavens and the earth in whatever manner and time frame the Almighty “chose.” If that were all, I might be among them. But most of them go a step further and also calculate the age of the universe based on a literal reading of the Bible, assuming that Biblical “days” are the same as ours. Which in itself raises problems, as the sun was not “put in place in the heavens” until the fourth day. Of course the age of the universe does not necessarily have any bearing on whether God created it all, because you can have your cake and eat it by believing that it was God who initiated the Big Bang. Time scales, as much in the Bible, were based on earlier Sumerian and Mesopotamian calendars, just as Western calendars are products of Christian theologians.

But what this dispute really highlights is the difference between “emunah peshutah” (simple, unquestioning belief) on the one hand, and belief that is prepared to accommodate science and rationalism on the other. The world in general is indeed divided along these lines on almost everything from climate change to whether a Sunni has the obligation to kill a Shia or a Kofir, and vice versa. It’s not unlike the difference between people who are superstitious and those who are not, between those who choose to follow the herd and those who stand apart. Not everyone has a high I.Q. or a penchant for philosophy. No two people are the same, so why should we expect everyone to think or feel in exactly the same way?

I believe in freedom, in the right of individuals to make their own choices wherever possible (provided they do no harm to others they disagree with) about how they live and what they choose to believe. If they want to believe in little men from outer space building pyramids, that’s their right. If they want to believe that all Jews want to control the world, are in league with the devil, and drink human blood for evening cocktails, that is their right, no matter how crazy or illogical. But once they try to harm anyone, they should be disabled before they kill someone.

Does it really matter to me how many thousands or millions or billions of years ago the earth was created? I am interested, but it really makes absolutely no actual difference. My relationship with God and the way I live a religious life are not at all based on scientific knowledge, but on internal spiritual intuition. You might call it “Simple Faith.” It is in one way. But I draw its line at the essential, not the peripheral. I do not believe that smashing willow branches on Hoshana Raba is a matter of life or death. It is significant, but a custom, after all, however ancient.

As we begin this week reading the Torah again, starting with creation, what I take from it is not a scientific theory but rather the idea that there is a spiritual dimension to our lives as well as a physical one. To reject or deny either is to limit one’s capacity to cope with life, to enjoy it. Our task is to strive to fulfill our potential in whichever way we are most inclined. Belief and religion are a means to an end, not an end in themselves.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Mishmarot

    Dear Mr. Rosen, Thank you for an interesting reflection.

    To me, the theological essay we call Genesis 1 or Bereshit, says: “God created the Universe and the way to live in due harmony with Creation is to live in a seven-day pattern.”

    The chronological argument is therefore a red herring. If you look around the world today, it operates on a seven-day model, which (to me again)suggests the invisible, but definite victory of Biblical wisdom over human anarchy.

    As Isaiah puts it, His ways are not our ways…

  • Julian Clovelley

    If you perceive yourself as “choosing to believe” then you do not comprehend the nature of consciousness but are focusing on a more superficial process of building a Worldview

    Does it matter? I believe it does, in that when one makes a choice as to what one considers to be truth, rather than seeks truth., one is exercising taste rather than reason. Taste can be both good and bad. How many ideologies are really the constant exercise of bad taste?

    That is the same process the Nazis in their propaganda called “Triumph of the Will”- the over-riding of all reason, all consideration, all compassion in the fulfilment of selfish desire

    Choosing to believe is antidemocratic and when those “beliefs” are used as motivation for action they are a form of bullying

    Beliefs do harm. We have a duty to ensure the accuracy of our beliefs. There was no six day creation. There are no different days – a day is 24 hours, the time it takes for the sun to return to the closest point to its position in the sky

    The Zionist form of Judaism relies heavily on “choosing to believe” – That is its Achilles Heel. Eventually the link between what you choose to believe and reality breaks. When that happens it may be to late for reform or evolution of understanding – and all that is left is to walk away, as, in my understanding, so many millions of people with Jewish ancestry, including in my own family, have done over two and a half thousand years

  • Ahram al-Yardum

    It does make a difference. If the earth was created only a few thousand years ago, then all evolutionary science, carbon dating, dendrochronology, etc. becomes fiction. And if all these things are fictitious, then everything we know about geology, biology, biomedicine, cancer, heritability, ecology, etc. are also fictitious. Mr Rosen, you are stradling something you do not understand.

  • Lance Ruffel

    Mr Rosen, the age of the Earth does not matter to most people. However scientists, especially Geologists and Biologists have a specific interest in the age of the Earth. To geologists , the Earth is something we can observe,The observed Earth has gone through many transformations. Continents have moved, land masses have risen or fallen. The result is a complex world around us. It is the job of Geologists to try to understand our world. They have to trace backwards in time the changes( folds, anticlines, synclines, faults and erosion surfaces- unconformities).Without this understanding there would not be much oil and gas production, mines would require “luck” to find. Biologists also need to understand the changes organisms have seen through time. All organisms are related due to evolutionary changes.
    The belief in G_d does not have to be in conflict with these studies.Yes have your beliefs but do no harm. Passing on the disdain for scientific investigation is doing harm.

Algemeiner.com