Saturday, March 24th | 8 Nisan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

October 15, 2015 10:58 am

Who Was the Most Destructive Jewish ‘Messiah’? It Wasn’t Jesus

avatar by Bernard Starr

Email a copy of "Who Was the Most Destructive Jewish ‘Messiah’? It Wasn’t Jesus" to a friend
The Jesus statue in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

The Jesus statue in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Ask Jewish people why they reject Jesus, and most will say it’s because he falsely declared himself to be the Messiah. In maintaining this stance they are following the view of twelfth-century Jewish philosopher and scholar Rabbi Moses Maimonides (known as Rambam) that the true Messiah must deliver the fruits of the Messianic prophesy before he dies.

Nevertheless, whether or not Jesus declared himself Messiah, or his followers believed he was the Messiah, shouldn’t he be recognized and respected as a dedicated Jew — a fact lavishly illustrated throughout the Gospels of the New Testament?

Christians have shrugged off Maimonides’ interpretation of the Messiah prophesy with their belief that Jesus will fulfill the Jewish Messianic prophesy in a second coming — a second coming that has been forecast as imminent since the first century in the teachings of Saint Paul.

Ironically, some devotees of the charismatic Hassidic Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who died in 1994, believe that he is the Messiah. In declaring the revered rabbi the Messiah they have deliberately or inadvertently endorsed the validity of a second coming, since Rabbi Schneerson did not deliver the golden age before he died.

Consider, too, that Jews do not shun the hoards of other false Jewish “Messiahs” throughout history.

When I address Jewish audiences and challenge the Messiah argument as justification for rejecting Jesus, people fire back: “He was responsible for the death of millions of Jews.” But when I ask them to cite anything that Jesus said or did that was harmful to Jews they come up with nothing credible. Of course, those who committed heinous acts against Jews and others in the name of Jesus cannot ask Jesus what he thought about the use of his name to justify murderous acts antithetical to his life and teachings. If they had, the disconnect between their acts and Jesus’ teachings would be obvious.

Author Jerry Rabow has written about the lives of 50 Jewish Messiahs, some major ones with a huge number of followers worldwide and other “Messiahs” more “flash in the pan.” His informative and entertaining “Messiah” stories range from inspirational to tragic, often with comic elements. Several Jewish “Messiahs” inflicted great damage on Jews and Judaism. Yet they get winks for their destructive antics, not the condemnation leveled against Jesus.

In the fifth century, Moses of Crete convinced the entire Jewish population of that Greek island that he was the Messiah. He was so persuasive that his followers sold all their possessions and met him at a cliff overlooking the Aegean Sea for the return to the Promised Land. He then told his mesmerized believers that if they jumped into the water God would part the sea. They jumped, but many didn’t walk out. Some drowned and others were rescued. The “Messiah” Moses mysteriously disappeared with their money, never to be seen again.

At the end of the thirteenth century, Abraham Ben Samuel Abulafia heard God tell him that he was the Messiah. He then set out for Rome to convert Pope Nicholas III to Judaism. The Pope imprisoned Abulafia and prepared to burn him at the stake. Lucky for Albulafia the Pope suddenly was struck by the plague and died. Abulafia was released and spent the rest of his life writing mystical books, according to Rabow.

“Messiah” David Reuveni received his calling in the early sixteenth century. Unlike Abulafia, who had a small following, Reuveni was known by Jews throughout Europe. In 1524 he brazenly appeared in the palace of Pope Clement VII and asked the Pope to supply him with an army to liberate the Holy Land from the Turks. According to Jerry Rabow, the Pope bought Reuveni’s claim that he was the general of the lost tribes of Israel, which would participate in the battle for the Holy Land. The Pope even began to believe that Reuveni was the Messiah. But the plan unraveled when the King of Portugal began to fear the rising messianic fervor among Jews. Reuveni appealed to Emperor Charles V of Spain, who promptly sent him to the Inquisition.

In the seventeenth century another “Messiah,” Shabbatai Zevi, appeared on the scene. According to Karen Armstrong, author of History of God, at one point Zevi signed his letters: “I am the Lord your God Shabbetai Zevi.” Prominent among Zevi’s bizarre behaviors was his marriage to a Torah Scroll and his entrance into Jerusalem on a white horse circling the city seven times. He later married a prostitute. While many rabbis condemned Zevi and expelled him from their communities, others flocked to his fold proclaiming him “Messiah.” His plan to conquer Turkey rallied Jews all over the world into his messianic camp — perhaps as many as a million. After his arrest in Turkey he was given the choice of death or conversion. He became a Muslim.

Some Jewish “Messiahs,” far from being shunned, are still celebrated. The brilliant sixteenth-century Kabbalist Isaac Luria (also known as Ari) was called “Messiah” by his followers and according to Rabow, “Probably Luria himself believed that he was the true Messiah.” After Luria’s death at thirty-eight his student Chaim Vital became his spiritual heir. Everything we know about Luria comes from Vital’s writings, since Luria’s teachings were strictly oral. Vital recorded and taught Luria’s Kabbalah. Following in Luria’s footsteps, Vital declared himself Messiah. Do Jews shun him for that? On the contrary, he too is an honored Kabbalist. His writings are must readings in Kabbalah courses. Tell the students he was a self-proclaimed Messiah and they are likely to casually shrug it off. Rabbis who won’t allow the name Jesus to cross their lips — an almost phobic reaction — enthusiastically teach the meditation techniques and mystical insights of the renowned Kabbalist scholar the “Messiah” Luria, which were recorded by the “Messiah” Vital. Does anyone today believe that either Luria or Vital is the Messiah?

Yet continued reverence for Luria surfaced in 2005 when the singer Madonna, a Kabbalah devotee, recorded a song honoring Luria (“Isaac”). The Associated Press reported that many rabbis in Israel were outraged, despite the song’s adoration. One rabbi said: “Jewish law forbids the use of the name of the holy Rabbi for profit.” Another called for Madonna’s expulsion from the community for “bringing sin upon the holiness of the Rabbi [Luria].”

By far the most destructive Jewish “Messiah” was Simon Bar Kokhba. Some Jews still call him a hero and a great defender of the Jewish faith. His followers were convinced he was the Messiah. Bar Kokhba’s messianic status got a hefty boost when the renowned Rabbi Akiva endorsed him as Messiah.

Bar Kokhba rose up against the mighty Roman empire in 132 CE after the Emperor Hadrian imposed oppressive restrictions on Jewish practices. An edict forbidding circumcision swept Jews into a fanatical frenzy of revolt. The restrictions were punitively imposed in response to relentless guerilla warfare waged for years by Jewish zealots against Roman soldiers.

Bar Kokhba’s well-trained army of a hundred thousand warriors (some sources say much more) inflicted staggering casualties on elite Roman troops. He decimated two Roman legions, defeated two leading Roman generals, seized Jerusalem, and conquered most of Judea and Galilee. He even minted coins for his independent kingdom. Bar Kokhba’s seemingly miraculous victory over the most powerful army in the world offered convincing proof to his Jewish followers that he was indeed the Messiah.

But his success would prove short-lived. The enraged Emperor Hadrian dispatched his most famous general, Julius Severus, with twelve Roman legions, half of the worldwide Roman army, to crush the rebellion. In testimony to the strength of Bar Kokhba’s army it still took the Romans two years to defeat him.

The defeat was devastating. Jerusalem was leveled, nearly a thousand villages were demolished, and more than a half a million Jews were killed, according to Roman historian Cassius Dio. Countless others, including many rabbis, were sold into slavery. It was the beginning of the great Diaspora, in which Jews would be scattered throughout Europe and elsewhere — defenseless, marginalized, and persecuted. The world would not see a Jewish army again for nearly two thousand years, when the modern state of Israel was founded.

In a “what if” speculation I’ve wondered how history would have played out had Bar Kokhba and Rabbi Akiva quelled the insurgency and negotiated with the Romans rather than rebelling against them. The Emperor Hadrian was not totally hostile to Judaism. He permitted Jews to return to Jerusalem (they were expelled after the war of 70 CE), and even allowed, but then reneged on, the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem.

If Bar Kokhba’s second-century Jewish army was powerful enough to stand up to the Roman army at the height of its power, how much more powerful would it have been a few hundred years later when the Roman Empire collapsed? The fragmented kingdoms that emerged in Europe were constantly at war with each other with relatively small armies. Even hundreds of years later the crusading armies were minuscule compared to Bar Kokhba’s second-century army. A mighty Jewish army, larger and stronger than Bar Kokhba’s, would surely have been formidable if not unbeatable. If that were the case, it’s possible that Judaism would have become the dominant world religion.

It’s an intriguing idea, but the reality is that “Messiah” Bar Kokhba’s “heroism” was ultimately suicidal and incredibly destructive to Jews and Judaism.

Given the history of Jewish “Messiahs,” who today are considered false but still are not rejected as Jews — indeed, some are still honored and revered — how can Jews’ shunning of Jesus be justified? In the spirit of reconciliation isn’t it time for Jews to drop the Jesus phobia?

Bernard Starr, PhD, is Professor Emeritus at the City University of New York (Brooklyn College). His latest book is “Jesus, Jews, and Anti-Semitism in Art: How Renaissance Art Erased Jesus’ Jewish Identity and How Today’s Artists Are Restoring It.” He is also organizer of the art exhibit “Putting Judaism Back in the Picture: Toward Healing the Christian/Jewish Divide.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • American Jew

    Mr. Starr,

    that is interesting but a bit misleading.

    First, you have to define Moshiach is and what the responsibilities are. Moshiach means “anointed one” so that would include Jewish Kings and Prophets.

    Melech Ha Moshiach, the prophesied King Moshiach is what you are speaking of. His role is to bring together the Jewish nation, teach Torah, usher in a new age of knowledge of Hashem and to rebuild the Beit Ha Mikdash. Melech Ha Moshiach plain and simple has to be the leader of the Jewish people. The Moshiach also has to be an heir of Dovid ha Melech—through the tribe of Yehudah. In order to be Melech Ha Moshiach, you must fulfill all of these requirements.

    The Lubavitcher Rebbe never claimed to be Moshiach. Some of his follower believe he is the Moshiach (some do not), but even among those who do, it is split among those who believe the Rebbe is Melech Ha Moshiach and those who believe (based on an perfectly legitimate interpretation of the Gemorah) that the Rebbe is a candidate to be Moshiach.

    Clearly the Rebbe brought Jews back to Torah in droves and was the leader of the Jewish people, not just caring for his own flock, but for all Jews everywhere. Which is why he sent his emissaries out to every remote corner of the globe to find Jews and help them do Torah Mitzvot.

    If you read the Gemorah, it says that Bar Kochba sinned and he died, therefore he wasn’t Moshiach. The most common held belief is that he could not be Moshiach because he died, but it is also possible that he couldn’t be Moshiach not because he died, but because he sinned. In other words, had he not sinned, he might still have been eligible for this supra-natural task where the common laws of physics and nature simply do not apply.

    Those Jews who believe that death is the only or even the major disqualification from being Melech Ha Moshiach are sadly ignorant of their own religion. Death is not the reason why someone isn’t eligible. Eligibility is based on your lineage and your actions and accomplishment. Based on the Gemorah, there is a possibility that someone who was a leader of the Jewish people, who brought them back to Torah mitzvot and who did not have Aveyrahs (sins) could still be eligible for the role if chosen after he is physically not still in this world.

    The Jewish rejection of Jesus (yuskah) is NOT because he died, it is because he did fulfill a single thing listed when he was alive and because he wasn’t even eligible for the task in the first place since his lineage comes from the tribe of Benyamin, not Yehudah. The Xtian bible tries to fix this by claiming he was really from the tribe of Yehudah on his mother’s side, but we all know that the Torah defines tribal lineage as coming from your father, not your mother. Some try to claim that since Yuskah’s father is of a higher authority…. They are really setting of the BS meters with that one.

    Yuskah is considered treif to Jews because not only did he not fulfill any of the eligibility requirements for the jobe, but because his followers created a religion which killed MILLIONS of Jews and led others away from keeping Torah mitzvot (a major no-no). That alone is enough to get you banned for all time. And there are passages in the Xtian bible that show Yushkah NOT following the Torah laws. He traveled great distances on Shabbos, he cursed Hashem when he was crucified instead of reciting S’hma. The list goes on…

    While you may very well be correct that Yushkah himself did not condone any of the terrible things subsequently done in his name, any attempt to cleanse him of the evil things done based on his words and teaching is like trying to separate Kosher cheese and Kosher bread from a Ham and cheese sandwich and declaring the parts that remain to be kosher. At this point it is impossible to wipe the TREIF off Yushkah.

  • Gnomercy9

    No. Better to die on one’s feet than live on one’s knees.

    It isn’t Bar Kochba’s fault that in 19 centuries in Eurabia we couldn’t produce a single Leader to simply get on his horse, ride Spain to Russia assembling an army, and say, “Boys, we’re going home.” Not one leader. No large numbers of fighting-age men ready go home.

    Instead we produced armies of cowards and academics – and we got slaughtered begging for acceptance rather than building a strong and secure Nation by earning fear.

    “Cowardice is so ignoble an inner state that men struggle to overcome it, in the face of real dangers. The appeaser chooses a state of cowardice where no danger exists. To live in fear is so unworthy a condition that men have died on barricades, defying the tyranny of the mighty.

    The appeaser chooses to live in chronic fear of the impotent. Men have died in torture chambers, on the stake, in concentration camps, in front of firing squads, rather than renounce their convictions. The appeasers renounces his under the pressure of a frown on a vacant face. Men have refused to sell their souls in exchange for fame, fortune, power, even their own lives. The appeaser does not sell his soul: he gives it away for free, getting nothing in return.” (Ayn Rand: The Age of Envy).

  • Akiva Shapero

    Generally speaking this whole article is a bunch of phooey. Where are the sources for these so called statements of “fact”?

    • I provided hyperlinks to sources. Did you bother to check them out? What facts do you question? And please give citations to back up whatever you may say.

  • Eric R.

    Mr. Starr:

    The implication in this article is that Jews should not fight oppression, but negotiate with it.

    You cannot negotiate with the Hitlers, the Stalins, the Khomeinis of this world — all filthy, psychotic, deranged Jew-killing savages. People who believe in killing Jews at any and all costs.

    Bar Kochba had the right idea. The analogy to Bar Kochba is not to messianic figures but to the Warsaw Ghetto rebellion – Jews rebelling against a dominant military force.

  • David Siegel

    I agree with Dr. Starr that Jesus should not be vilified. He was justifying to make Jews “better” Jews, in my opinion. I think that the reason that he has been rejected by Jews is that none of these other so-called Messiahs resulted in the splitting off of followers, which resulted in the founding of a new religion. None of this is Jesus’ fault, however, but this new religion led to the persecution and demonization of Jews, by his followers, as “Christ killers”. This label was not removed until the second Vatican Council held that we Jews were free of guilt in his death. Jesus, of course had nothing to do with this persecution, but it was hard for most Jews not to associate him with this new religion’s hatred of our people.

  • I read the book 50 Jewish Messiahs, and I question the accuracy of its “facts”. I do NOT recommend that book.

    I highly recommend THE REAL MESSIAH by Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan. It is excellent.

    Last but not least the Rambam commentary on Mishnah Sanhedrin, chapter 10 says: “When the messiah dies, his son will rule after him and after that his grandson.”

    Notice that Rambam disqualifies childless men from being the messiah.

    Over the past 2,000 years, 36 Jewish men have claimed to be the messiah. 34 of them died childless, one of them had a daughter and one of them had two sons who died before he did. Therefore, all of them cannot be the messiah, according to Rambam, because none of them had a son and a grandson who ruled after they died.