Wednesday, August 10th | 14 Av 5782

November 12, 2015 7:33 am

An Israeli Peace Activist’s Rude Awakening

avatar by Benyamin Korn

Moshe Halbertal. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Moshe Halbertal. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

An Israeli peace activist who has devoted much of his life to demanding that Israel make more concessions to the Palestinians was treated to a rude awakening earlier this month on a Minnesota campus: it turns out that pro-Palestinian advocates don’t just hate Israeli policy — they hate all Israelis, including Israeli peace activists.

Hebrew University professor Moshe Halbertal was invited to deliver the University of Minnesota’s annual Dewey Lecture in the Philosophy of Law. Unfortunately, the Palestinian and pro-Palestinian activists on campus don’t have very much respect for the philosophy of law, at least not the laws that protect freedom of speech. Two dozen hecklers tried to drown out Halbertal by shouting “denunciations of Israel” (as the local press described it) and accusing Halbertal of being “a war crimes apologist.”

Ironically, in his remarks (after the hecklers were removed), Professor Halbertal suggested that Israeli soldiers were not doing enough to protect enemy civilians during warfare. Since that was his position, Halbertal must have been puzzled that the Palestinian advocates would attack him so fiercely.

Welcome to the real world, Moshe Halbertal. Criticizing Israeli polices is not enough. When the hecklers called him a “war crimes apologist,” they weren’t referring to one or two particular alleged war crimes. They consider the very existence of the State of Israel to be a war crime. Thus if someone supports Israel’s right to exist — even the shrunken, weakened Israel that Halbertal wants — then they are “war crimes apologists.”

Related coverage

August 10, 2022 12:24 pm

Restoring Libya’s Ancient Jewish Community

The Libyan Jewish community was one of the world’s oldest Jewish communities, with some historians tracing the Jewish settlement there...

Quite a turn of events for someone who has made a name for himself as an Israeli critic of Israel. Of course, he had a good deal help along the way, especially from New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman. Of the 25 times that Halbertal has been quoted in the Times, nine of them have been in Friedman’s column on the op-ed page.

We all know how that works. Friedman picks a theme for one of his anti-Israel columns, then calls up the same five or six “respected Israeli academicians” to see which of them will provide a quotation that matches his predetermined theme.

Halbertal was discovered by the Times to be a “useful Israeli” even before he had entered the academic world. In February 1983, when he was just “a 24-year-old religious student,” the Times was excitedly reporting how Halbertal was part of a supposed new generation of religious Israelis who disdained the idea of “holding territory” and was forming a group to advocate “relinquishing part of the West Bank.”

Soon enough, Halbertal managed to secure an academic title, so the Times could pretend he was a “respected academician,” instead of having to acknowledge that he was basically a partisan “community organizer.”

A sampling of Halbertal’s pearls of unwisdom in the pages of the Times over the years:

  • The Jewish residents of Judea-Samaria are comparable to the Zealots in Roman times who, “mobilized by a megalomanic sense of their role in history, pushed the Jewish people at the time into a struggle they did not want [until] it destroyed them.” (Sept. 18, 1997)
  • Those who oppose Israeli territorial surrender “are dooming Israel to an apartheid state.” (July 28, 2000).
  • Halbertal “disapproved” of an Israeli strike on a terrorist leader in Gaza, because some of the terrorist’s relatives were nearby and were harmed. (Jan. 13, 2009)
  • Halbertal participated in weekly vigils in a mostly-Arab neighborhood in Jerusalem to demand that Jews not be allowed to move into the area. The Ku Klux Klan would have been proud. (March 10, 2010)
  • Israeli soldiers in Gaza did not do enough “to avoid civilian casualties.” (March 20, 2009}
  • The window for a two-state solution “is rapidly closing,” so Israel “will either be apartheid or Lebanon.” (Dec. 12, 2010)

That last dire warning about Israel being on the verge of “apartheid” was uttered by Halbertal five years ago. Funny, five years have passed and still no apartheid. That’s because the “apartheid” warnings are really just a cheap scare tactic to pressure Israel into making more concessions.

But no amount of concessions will be enough to satisfy the Palestinians, so long as Israel still exists. To them, any size Israel, and all Israelis, are the enemy. As Moshe Halbertal discovered in Minnesota this month.

Mr. Korn, chairman of the Philadelphia Religious Zionists, is former executive editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent and the Miami Jewish Tribune.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.