Friday, August 23rd | 22 Av 5779

December 10, 2015 7:39 am

Attention Mr. President: ‘Economic Strain’ Does Not Cause Terrorism

avatar by Benyamin Korn

President Barack Obama. Photo:

President Barack Obama. Photo:

In an interview on CBS-TV‘s “This Morning” last week, President Obama outlined his theory of the causes of terrorism. Climate change,  he said, is straining natural resources around the world, and “when people are not able to make a living or take care of their families,” they become “desperate,” and “as human beings are placed under strain, then bad things happen.”

The next day, a middle-class Muslim couple who was not under any evident financial strain and was perfectly capable of taking care of its six-month- old daughter, decided to massacre 14 people in San Bernardino, California.

The terrorist, Syed Farook, was not “desperate.” He was a graduate of California State University and an environmental health specialist who worked for the San Bernardino County heath department, with an annual salary of $53,000. His wife and co-terrorist, Tashfeen Malik, was also a college graduate (Bahuddin Zakri University in Pakistan). They lived in a two-story townhouse in a nice neighborhood.

The idea that the cause of terrorism is poverty has long been promoted by officials of the Obama administration. Recall what State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf told MSNBC‘s “Hardball” host Chris Matthews on February 16 of this year: “We cannot kill our way out of this war. We need in the medium to longer term to go after the root causes that leads people to join these groups, whether it’s a lack of opportunity for jobs, whether — we can work with countries around the world to help improve their governance. We can help them build their economies so they can have job opportunities for these people.”

Related coverage

August 23, 2019 4:28 pm

Why Is New York Times Still Surprised When AIPAC Breaks With Netanyahu?

How many times does the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) need to break publicly with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin...

Yet study after study of the motives of Arab and Muslim terrorists during the past two decades has found exactly the opposite

Between 1996 and 1999, relief worker Nasra Hassan interviewed nearly 250 Palestinians who either attempted to carry out suicide bombings, trained others for such attacks, or were related to deceased bombers. She reported (in The New Yorker): “None of [the bombers] were uneducated, desperately poor, simple-minded, or depressed. Many were middle class and, unless they were fugitives, held paying jobs… Two were the sons of millionaires.”

The attacks on September 11, 2001, focused new attention on the causes of terrorism. The New York Times reported that the personal details concerning the hijackers had “confounded the experts.”

“They were adults with education and skill, not hopeless young zealots,” the Times said of the attackers. “At least one left behind a wife and young children… They were not reckless young men facing dire economic conditions and dim prospects, but men as old as 41 enjoying middle class lives.”

Three important studies of this question were carried out after 9/11.

In 2002, Prof. Alan Krueger of Princeton and Prof. Jitka Maleckova of Prague’s Charles University studied the lives of 129 Lebanese Hezbollah terrorists who were killed while carrying out attacks on Israel. The professors found that the Hezbollah members were less likely than “other Lebanese, to come from poor families and were significantly more likely to have completed secondary education.”

That same year, the Muslim writer Hala Jaber spent four days with Fatah’s Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, which has organized many suicide bombings. She found that their members were “educated [and] middle class.”

In 2004, Prof. Alberto Abadie of Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government undertook a study of terrorists’ motives. When he began his research, he thought that “it was a reasonable assumption that terrorism has its roots in poverty.” By the time he was done, Prof. Abadie had concluded there is “no significant relationship” between the economic conditions in a given country and the rise of terrorists there.

The facts are clear, even if they soundly refute President Obama’s politically correct worldview.

Poverty does not cause terrorism; if it did, the hassidim of Brooklyn and Mea Shearim would be the world’s most active terrorists. Climate change or food shortages or other types of economic strain do not cause terrorism either.

Radical ideology — in this case, radical Islamist ideology — is what causes terrorism.

Mr. Korn, chairman of the Philadelphia Religious Zionists, is former executive editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent and the Miami Jewish Tribune.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.