Tuesday, December 12th | 24 Kislev 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
January 14, 2016 3:39 pm

Lawyer for Accused Murderer of Rabbi in Florida Accuses State of Withholding Evidence

avatar by Shiryn Solny

Email a copy of "Lawyer for Accused Murderer of Rabbi in Florida Accuses State of Withholding Evidence" to a friend
Rabbi Joseph Raksin, who was killed on his way to synagogue in 2014. Photo: Crownheights.info.

Rabbi Joseph Raksin, who was killed on his way to synagogue in 2014. Photo: Crownheights.info.

The defense attorney for a teenager accused of murdering a rabbi in Miami Beach accused the state of Florida of withholding evidence, CBS Miami reported on Wednesday.

“Prosecution 101 is if you see evidence you try to preserve it right away,” Adam Goodman, who is representing 15-year-old Deandre Charles, argued during the hearing. “It seems like it’s easier to get an appointment with some of the difficult restaurants in Miami-Dade County than it is to get that appointment.”

Goodman explained that the State Attorney’s office, which has been working for 16 months on the case of the murder of Rabbi Joseph Raskin, 60, is required by law to reveal all evidence against the defendant to his lawyer.

Charles is accused of shooting the Orthodox rabbi during a robbery attempt in 2014. Raskin, from Brooklyn, NY, was visiting Florida when he was shot on his way to Shabbat services at Bais Menachem Chabad.

Related coverage

August 29, 2017 5:47 pm
0

US Jewish Groups Praise Tillerson’s Renewal of State Department Antisemitism Envoy

US Jewish groups reacted with praise and relief on Tuesday to the news that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is...

During the hearing, Goodman said two photos were shown on a TV news broadcast before being given to Charles’ legal counsel. The State denied leaking the pictures, and prosecutors claimed that even they have not seen some of the evidence in question.

“(It) was not provided by the State Attorney’s office. Period,” said prosecutor Michael Von Zamft. “We have an obligation to continue to turn over discovery, and when we get it, we will turn it over.”

The State has also not yet identified the eyewitness who picked Charles out of a lineup, according to CBS Miami. A prosecutor explained the decision to withhold the eyewitness’ name, saying, “Because of the public disclosures that have been made in this case, we have decided to only list those witnesses by their initials and exclude their addresses for their safety.”

It was agreed in court that the defense would have the opportunity to interrogate the witness, but must keep his name confidential. That eyewitness will take the stand on Friday, during the Arthur Hearing, the stage during which the defense will be able to argue that Charles should be given a bond. Prosecutors said they will record the eyewitness testimony during the hearing.

The judge set a date for another hearing to get an update on when the State will have more evidence to release.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Emanuel

    The lawyer sounds like he’s never made a reservation at a restaurant before in his life. If the state violated discovery rules move for sanctions. Witnesses in cases of violent crime deserve to have their identities protected nothing suggests defendant was denied any right to confront his accusers.

Algemeiner.com