Monday, December 18th | 30 Kislev 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
January 14, 2016 2:08 pm

With Friends Like These, Why Does Israel Need Enemies?

avatar by Judith Bergman

Email a copy of "With Friends Like These, Why Does Israel Need Enemies?" to a friend
US Ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro. Photo: Twitter Screenshot.

US Ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro. Photo: Twitter Screenshot.

The US administration is concerned about a new Israeli bill, dubbed the NGO bill, which requires nongovernmental organizations that receive ‎more than 50% of their funding from foreign government entities to detail the funding sources in all ‎their official publications and communications with elected officials. Activists from the NGOs also ‎will be required to wear identifying name tags when working in Israel’s Knesset, as lobbyists do.

This bill is seen by many as targeting certain left-wing organizations that receive substantial funding from abroad.

US Ambassador Dan Shapiro expressed the US’ concern over the NGO bill on Sunday, when he met with Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked. On Monday, the US Embassy in Tel Aviv issued what is considered a highly unusual statement regarding the meeting.

“Among the topics discussed was the government’s draft NGO bill,” stated the announcement. “Ambassador Shapiro sought more information about the draft legislation from the minister, and noted the US government’s concerns on the matter.”

Related coverage

December 17, 2017 12:41 pm
0

World Media Silent as Mahmoud Abbas — Israel’s ‘Peace Partner’ — Undermines Talks

Just how bad is the media bias against Israel? In a week filled with extensive coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict -- much...

“The ambassador noted that Israel is a strong and vibrant democracy, which gives substantial voice to all points of view and promotes a thriving, transparent civil society,” it continued. “He reiterated the United States’ view that such a free and functioning civil society is an essential element of a healthy democracy, and that governments must protect free expression and peaceful dissent and create an atmosphere where all voices can be heard.”

In an additional statement, the US Embassy dismissed comparisons between the NGO bill and a set of US laws mandating the registration of foreign interest lobbyists.

“The draft Israeli law would target NGOs simply because they are funded principally by foreign government entities. That is not how the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) works,” the embassy asserted. “FARA requires individuals or organizations to register as foreign agents only if they engage in certain specified activities at the order, request, or under the direction or control of a foreign principal — not simply by receiving contributions from such an entity. As a result, it does not create the chilling effect on NGO activities that we are concerned about in reviewing the draft Israeli NGO law.”

And then the Anti-Defamation League chimed in on Monday — because there is nothing quite like Diaspora Jews telling Israelis what to do from the comfort of their armchairs thousands of miles away: “The strength of Israeli society internally, as well as its international position, has been its bedrock commitment to democracy and free expression,” said Jonathan A. Greenblatt, ADL CEO. “There is no doubt that many Israelis today feel beleaguered, both by the security situation and the campaign to undermine the Jewish state’s legitimacy,” he continued.

“However, efforts to counter such campaigns through the tarring of NGOs and those holding certain political perspectives, threaten to erode Israel’s very democratic character, and could significantly harm Israel’s international legitimacy. We urge Knesset members to carefully consider the negative ramifications of the passage of this legislation,” he said.

As has been stated in this column previously in response to the EU’s meddling in the issue, the bill breaches no one’s rights, least of all anyone’s rights to freedom of speech ‎and association. The bill sets up reasonable and fair requirements even if the US administration happens to dislike them or interpret them as being different from American legislation.

What the US deliberately ignores is that Israel is a country surrounded by terrorist enemies and our situation here cannot in any way be compared to that of either the US or the EU. Having foreign powers meddle in an already explosive situation through the funding and instruction of subversive local NGOs is dangerous and it would be outrageous for any government to tolerate — and yet Israel continues to tolerate it! All the bill is doing is requiring a modicum of transparency. Given our situation that is actually extremely generous and shows the extreme respect that Israel pays every conceivable principle of democracy. It is doubtful that any of the countries now voicing their displeasure with Shaked’s bill would tolerate the level of intrusion from other governments that Israel does, if they happened to find themselves in our security predicament.

Shaked rejected the US’ attempt to intervene. “[Sunday] I met the American ambassador and was under the impression that the American administration’s interest and concern is sincere,” she said. “But there is no cause for concern. Israel is a strong democracy and as such there is no need for other nations to intervene in internal legislation. Our door is open to dialogue with friends. … It is the right of any organization in Israel to object to any legislation. But it is very strange to me that foreign governments extend their long arms into internal legislation processes.”

The US’ pathetic hypocrisy regarding the NGO bill was dramatically highlighted on Tuesday when it surfaced that former Secretary of State and current presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was considering using precisely those much-debated local NGOs to force the American administration’s own agenda on Israel. The plan was to generate Tahrir Square-style demonstrations, which would catch the attention of the world and thus build pressure on the Israeli government to make the concessions that the US had failed to force on it. The plan was outlined in an email sent by former US Ambassador to Israel Thomas Pickering, which was recently made public as part of an investigation into Clinton’s correspondence. It is clear from the email that the former ambassador was fully aware that this ostensibly low-key revolt might erupt into violence.

Pickering made the following suggestions in his email: “What will change the situation is a major effort to use nonviolent protests and demonstrations to put peace back in the center of people’s aspirations as well as their thoughts, and use that to influence the political leadership. … On the Israeli side, it must be public demonstrations and show growth as well. Outside the Prime Minister’s Office and the major squares and parks in Jerusalem and elsewhere have been the traditional places for demonstrations like this for peace and change to begin and persevere. Rabin Square in Tel Aviv would be right. The Peace Now organization, despite its decline, is one starting point.”

“Most of all the United States, in my view, cannot be seen to have stimulated, encouraged or be the power behind it for reasons you will understand better than anyone. I believe third parties and a number NGOs on both sides would help, particularly if there were an outline of a peace document with parameters which, like those at the end of the Clinton administration, promised a fair and lasting peace and which the women on both sides could agree to support.”

The above email is beyond embarrassing, it shows an appalling lack of understanding of Israeli affairs by someone who had served as an ambassador to the country. It shows a commitment to a flawed and biased “narrative” of the Israeli situation.

Evidently, the American push to defeat the NGO bill is not driven by any ostensible concern for “democracy” but by the US administration’s own vested interests. Because the NGO bill would severely diminish the US ability to pull a stunt such as the one suggested by Pickering without being “seen to have stimulated, encouraged or be the power behind it.” It shows just how crucial and important this NGO bill is!

Just like the EU, the current US administration wants to push its agendas down Israel’s throat. If it doesn’t work in the conventional manner of diplomacy, it will not shy away from shamelessly suggesting pushing those agendas clandestinely by using local NGOs who are happy to assist in subverting their own government.

With friends like these — who needs enemies?

Judith Bergman is a writer and political analyst living in Israel.

This article was originally published by Israel Hayom. 

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Dave M

    This bill should be changed to require that any NGO that get’s more than 10% of its funds from foreign sources, private or governmental. I don’t see why those NGO’s who are so proud of their “work” should have a problem advertising their “good deeds”

  • Yale

    What catches me by surprise is that if the foreign governments were proud of what they were doing they wouldn’t take such offence at its becoming public information. Their upset with the NGO bill establishes that they know they are manipulating forces within Israel for their advantage and to the disadvantage of the Israeli public. If they really wanted Israel to be a democracy they wouldn’t be sponsoring internal dissension like this.

  • A Switzer

    It’s absurd for America to even comment but they should congratulate Israel for taking steps to create more transparency, to expose anti Israel bias and to fight antisemitism and anti democratic groups. The US should worry more about its own security, inherent racist police in major cities, it’s polarized politics, anti immigrant hordes and internal issues. It’s population has to deal with co sequence e of potentially unless I g an Iranian terrorist regime on the world. Do they appreciate Israeli intervention?

  • Holy Shirt

    Obama (through Shapiro’s J Street tongue) is so full of shmutz it pours from his eyes, ears and nose. Translate THAT to Ivrit!

  • stevenl

    Is Israel telling the EU and or the US how to run their business?
    Liberals espouse no values in particular but believe in the right to tell other how to behave!
    Alas, eight years won’t be enough to weaken and then transform the US into a socialist and depraved country.

  • Azulka

    Israel has come of age,Judith has given a through report to a long standing problem of fifth column and left wing subversion in Israel.The fact is clear in Israel’s history,when it began as a socialist,left leaning country,their was a need for the Gov’t to initially handle it’s affairs of state in that manner and be among other nations with similar views.Things have changed,Israel stands today as a leading power and a Jewish majority,growing at a remarkable pace.The old ideas of giving up land or two state solution are dwindling into obscurity.But like most non profit foundations,they too fall into a malaise of purpose.
    In some cases it is a knee jerk,writing of a check to a group that has turned radical and no one bothered to get an update,just signing an annual check.We would venture to say,most of the Israeli victims of terror,were attacked directly or indirectly with funding from abroad,this is where the bill is needed to expose and make aware monies for terror.

  • Art

    Coming from an administration that abandoned the green revolu tin in Iran so as to not interfere with Iran’s internal affairs shows the moral bankruptcy of Obama Hillary Kerry

  • Francis Figliola

    Good, good, good, good!

  • Laura

    How does it tar NGOs to require that they divulge the reality if they are in fact foreign-government funded organizations? How does it undermine Israeli democracy to force organizations that claim to be non-governmental to reveal that they are in fact funded by, and therefore fulfilling the wishes of, foreign governments?

    The clear and obvious fact is that these complaints are self-serving and do not have Israel’s best interests at heart.

  • Rabbi Dr. Daniel M. Zucker

    The point of the bill is to require fiscal transparency; it would be very good if there was more fiscal transparency in all areas of political life. NGO’s and government offices both need greater transparency, so you get my vote on this one. BTW, the USA could use such a law big time as well !

  • Mike P.

    Funny how Ambassador Dan comes out with this the same week it is revealed that Sidney Blumenthal, father of pathological Israel-hater, Max Blumenthal, had told Hillary Clinton to encourage Palestinians to start Intifada III.

    No wonder Ambassador Dan doesn’t like the NGO bill.

    It would prevent the US from backing anti-Israel NGO’s for exactly this type of violent proxy war against Israel.

  • The NGO legislation further legitimatizes Israel’s right to protect its interests. And no country has a right to interfere with the internal affairs of Israel.

  • Richard

    Israel must continue to do what is best for it’s own security and survivaland not be pressured by American double standards or the anti-Semitism of the European Union

  • Carol Ann

    Well-written piece. Horrific hypocrisy of Obama administration noted.

    You can be sure that when the POTUS says we have Israel’s back, he surely means with a knife at it.

    The Israeli response was spot-on.

Algemeiner.com