Saturday, March 25th | 27 Adar 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
January 18, 2016 2:03 pm

Democratic Candidates Debate Mideast Policy, Disagree on Ties With Iran

avatar by JNS.org

Email a copy of "Democratic Candidates Debate Mideast Policy, Disagree on Ties With Iran" to a friend
Democratic primary nominees, Hillary Clinton, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and former Maryland governor Martin O'Malley debated their policies on Sunday in the NBC/YouTube Democratic primary debate in Charleston, S.C. Photo: YouTube screenshot.

Democratic primary nominees, Hillary Clinton, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley debated their policies on Sunday in the NBC/YouTube Democratic primary debate in Charleston, S.C. Photo: YouTube screenshot.

JNS.org – Democratic primary nominees Hillary Clinton, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley outlined their policies on Sunday in the NBC/YouTube Democratic primary debate in Charleston, SC. The two frontrunners, Clinton and Sanders, discussed their views on American foreign policy in the Middle East and struck divergent notes on emerging relations with Iran.

“What the nightmare is, which many of my Republican colleagues appear to want is to not have learned the lesson of Iraq. To get American young men and women involved in perpetual warfare in the quagmire of Syria and the Middle East would be an unmitigated disaster that as president, I will do everything in my power to avoid,” Sanders said.

“I think what we’ve got to do is move as aggressively as we can to normalize relations with Iran,” said Sanders. The first wave of international sanctions on Iran was removed over the weekend as part of the nuclear deal with the P5+1 nations.

Related coverage

September 19, 2016 4:01 pm
5

Watchdog Uncovers New Members in Antisemitic Student Ring at U of Tennessee That Supports Terrorism, Lauds Hitler

A ring of antisemitic students at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville (UTK) has turned out to be larger than originally...

“The fact that we’ve managed to reach an agreement, something that I’ve very strongly supported that prevents Iran from getting a nuclear weapon and we did that without going to war. And that I believe we’re seeing a fall in our relationships with Iran is a very positive step. So if your question is, do I want to see that relationship become more positive in the future? Yes,” he said.

Clinton said she is “very proud of the Iran nuclear agreement,” but took a more cautious approach to relations with Iran.

“I was very pleased to be part of what the president put into action when he took office. I was responsible for getting those sanctions imposed which put the pressure on Iran. It brought them to the negotiating table which resulted in this agreement. And so, they have been so far, following their requirements under the agreement. But I think we still have to carefully watch them,” she added.

Sanders said that “in terms of our priorities in the region, our first priority must be the destruction of ISIS. Our second priority must be getting rid of [Syrian President Bashar] Assad, through some political settlement, working with Iran, working with Russia. But the immediate task is to bring all interests together who want to destroy ISIS, including Russia, including Iran, including our Muslim allies to make that the major priority.”

“We’ve got to be more united in preventing [Russian President Vladimir] Putin from taking a more aggressive stance in Europe and the Middle East,” Clinton said, though she added, “We got Russia to sign on to our sanctions against Iran and other very important commitments…in diplomacy, you are always trying to see how you can figure out the interest of the other to see if there isn’t some way you can advance your security and your values.”

“[President Barack Obama’s] decision to go after the chemical weapons [in Syria] once there was a potential opportunity to build on when the Russians opened that door resulted in a very positive outcome. We were able to get the chemical weapons out…it could very well have affected the surrounding states, Jordan, Israel, Lebanon, Turkey,” Clinton said.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Emanuel

    Any Jew who votes Democrat this time is not a Jew at all, I’ve votef D 3 times but this is a no brainier these people shouldn’t be in government to begin with, talk about idiots “move to aggressively normalize with Iran” if $150 billion and an apology isn’t far enough there really is no limit to their stupidity. Sanders is a lunatic he knows nothing about socialism and is just an Obama front man and banker in disguise spouting nonsense about things he knows nothing about. If Bernie is so damn nice to everyone why not send us all some money ? Oh because it’s all an act, TRUMP 2016.

  • shloime

    i guess hillary didn’t get the memo – assad didn’t actually get rid of most of his chemical weapons, once the world’s back was turned. but it’s very ironic that she mentions this in the same breath as the nuclear deal, since both of these “diplomatic successes” will probably bite the next president’s butt. almost as great a success as benghazi and the 400 stingers that she gave to the jihadists in libya.

    sadly, it seems that the democrats’ leading candidates are all lining up to continue obama’s failed middle east policies.

Algemeiner.com