Friday, December 15th | 27 Kislev 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
February 3, 2016 7:47 am

Obama’s Peace Talks Are Latest Blunder in Feckless Syria Policy

avatar by John Bolton

Email a copy of "Obama’s Peace Talks Are Latest Blunder in Feckless Syria Policy" to a friend
Russian airstrikes in Syria. Photo: Wikipedia.

Russian airstrikes in Syria. Photo: Wikipedia.

Negotiations to resolve the Syrian civil war stumbled to their opening in Geneva on Friday. If peace in a united Syria is their objective, these talks are doomed to failure.

Of course, if the UN-sponsored talks are intended simply to create the appearance of “doing something” about Syria, Geneva is a comfortable venue for charades. ISIS, Iran, Russia and the Bashar al-Assad regime see no risk, and perhaps some benefit, in a lengthy, inconclusive process.

Ironically, the party most reluctant to come to the Geneva table, Syria’s “moderate” opposition, fears that President Obama, its nominal supporter, may be poised to sell it out.

Washington allowed this descent into chaos, despite its repeatedly proclaimed policy of removing Assad and aiding the moderate opposition, because to do anything meaningful to advance its policy would have endangered the precious nuclear negotiations with Iran.

Related coverage

December 14, 2017 4:03 pm
0

‘Tis the Season to Recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s Capital

If there ever was a time to move the United States embassy to Jerusalem, ‘tis the season. This week marks Hanukkah,...

That unwillingness to carry through with its stated Syria policy has not changed since the Vienna deal on Iran’s nuclear program was signed last summer.

Nor will it for the next year, because, as the White House itself avows, the Iran agreement is the most significant achievement of Obama’s second term, his foreign-policy “ObamaCare.” Whatever assistance Washington now provides Syria’s moderate opposition, it won’t be sufficient to make a difference, as the embarrassing failures of Obama’s aid to the opposition so far already demonstrate. Expect no material change, therefore, until his successor takes office.

The next president will face the ruins left by Obama across the Middle East, a record of retreat and failure unparalleled in US history. Russia will be firmly entrenched, militarily and politically, in the portion of Syria the Assad regime still controls, and likely larger next January than it is now.

Whether Assad himself — or a Ba’ath Party clone — remains is less important than that the regime will still be dominant, perhaps with American complicity. The moderate opposition will be decimated, likely hanging on only in isolated positions, with no realistic strategic path forward.

ISIS is likely to continue controlling approximately the Syrian and Iraqi territory it now holds. Unless Assad has completely eliminated the moderate opposition, Russia will act against ISIS only to help the regime consolidate and secure its frontiers. The Kurds are likely to defend only their own territory. No one expects material increases in US and allied bombing or ground operations against ISIS.

Of course, the Syria problem has never been solely about Assad. It’s his supporters in Tehran, aided and abetted by the Kremlin’s siloviki, who have always been the main threat, through Iran’s nuclear program and its support for terrorism. After that is ISIS, a threat both in the region and globally.

Assad is a distant third. But here’s the bitter irony: Until recently, Syria was in fact a strategic sideshow. It was Obama’s inattentive foreign policy that has allowed Russia to expand its military presence significantly, elevating Syria to the same frontline status we increasingly see once again in Europe.

Defeating ISIS can be accomplished by working with Turkey, the Kurds and numerous Sunni Arab states, starting with the Saudis and other Gulf Arabs. We must not accept Assad’s regime, much less be complicit with it.

We will likely need to recognize the demise of Syria and Iraq, and create a new, secular Sunni state from their territory once ISIS is vanquished. America’s failure to act effectively against ISIS to date is readily reversible, and regional allies are all but begging for renewed attention to our own Middle East security interests.

Most importantly, the road to Damascus runs through Tehran. Our attention should be on regime change in Iran first. Only when the ayatollahs are swept aside is there even a glimmer of a chance for Middle East peace and security. Otherwise, their pursuit of nuclear weapons will continue unabated, as will their support for terrorism. No one should have any illusions on this point, especially the next president.

John Bolton, now at the American Enterprise Institute, was the US ambassador to the United Nations from August 2005 to December 2006.

This article was originally published by The New York Post.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Prakash

    ‘Defeating ISIS can be accomplished by working with Turkey, the Kurds and numerous Sunni Arab states, starting with the Saudis and other Gulf Arabs’. People may laugh. We have seen that ISIS oil trucks are moving out through Turkey. So ISIS can be defeated with Turkey’s support. hahaha. Then comes the great Saudi Arabia, the largest finacier of sunni wahhabi terrorists all over the world. Kurds are the only party mentioned by the author are sincere enough to fight ISIS.
    To stabilise the Middle East and remove the terrorists from the planet, the simple thing the international community can do is to remove the Saudi regime from Saudi Arabia, freeze their assets and help that country to become a democratic country. To defeat ISIS in Syria and Iraq can be possible if NATO remove Turkey from its membership so that Mr. Tayyip Erdogan can be silent. He is the most undemocratic leader in the entire Europe, who kills Turkey’s Kurdish population and here one can see the double standard of the USA and NATO. Why they are not involved in Turkey militarily to protect Kurds?? So people start guessing that any wrong doing by Wests are just right but the same done by others are war crimes, massacre etc. Can anybody tell on what basis the Kurdistan Workers Party get designated as Terrorists and the terrorists fighting with the legitimate Syrian Government get designated as moderate opposition???
    Dear friend, ISIS can be defeated only by way of making the legitimate Syrian government strong by stop supplying weapons to your “moderate” rebels. A strong Syrian Government with support of Kurds, Russia, Iran jointly with NATO (excluding Turkey) and USA altogether can defeat ISIS within no time.

Algemeiner.com