Saturday, July 22nd | 28 Tammuz 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
February 18, 2016 5:11 am

BDS Suffers an Important Defeat in Europe

avatar by Judith Bergman

Email a copy of "BDS Suffers an Important Defeat in Europe" to a friend
A BDS protestor.  Photo: Mohamed Ouda via Wikimedia Commons.

A BDS protestor. Photo: Mohamed Ouda via Wikimedia Commons.

In recent days, positive developments have occurred which prove — once again — that far from being the isolated nation that Israel’s detractors seek to portray, Israel thrives and enjoys good diplomatic relations, even with those who seek to stake the odds against it.

“Israel and the European Union have agreed to put relations between us back on track,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a briefing of ministers on Sunday. “In the conversation I had over the weekend with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini, I heard from her that the EU is opposed to any boycott of Israel, and about their action regarding product labeling, she defined it as nonbinding and said that it does not reflect their position regarding the final borders of the State of Israel, which can be determined — this is what she said — only in direct negotiations between the sides.”

This is something of a diplomatic victory, since the EU originally stated that these guidelines had to be followed by all EU member states. And although this development does not in any way signify that the issue of EU labeling is history — far from it — it means that it is now up to each EU country to determine whether they wish to label Israeli goods from Judea and Samaria or not.

Related coverage

July 21, 2017 2:41 pm
0

The Fable of George Soros

JNS.org – George Soros, the Hungarian-American billionaire, has all the makings of a character in a Hasidic fable. Here is a man...

“Of course, this is not to say that there will not be friction,” Netanyahu said. “There are things that we do not agree on. Neither is this to say that there will not be friction with specific countries within the EU, just as there are countries, more than a few, that also support our position. But the fact that the EU high representative for foreign affairs and security policy has come out strongly against BDS and against economic sanctions against Israel, is, of course, a step in the right direction.”

In other developments, new British government directives are aiming to prevent public bodies, universities and student unions from boycotting Israeli products. As reported by Israel Hayom on Monday, the new bill seeks to prevent any public body from imposing a boycott on a World Trade Organization member, which Israel has been since 1995. The regulation will essentially outlaw boycotting Israeli products — a threat often made against goods produced in Judea and Samaria — and allow the British government to take legal action against organizations that impose such boycotts. Under the plan, all publicly funded institutions would be barred from excluding goods produced by their idea of “unethical companies,” such as companies involved in arms trading, fossil fuels, tobacco products, or companies based in Judea and Samaria.

This is a very interesting development, because the UK already labels products from Judea and Samaria. In 2009, the British Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs issued a new, voluntary guidance, which said that labels should give “more precise information” about the origin of Israeli goods, like “Israeli settlement produce” or “Palestinian produce.” Until then, food from Judea and Samaria had been simply labeled “Produce of the West Bank.” At the time, the British Foreign Office denied this was a boycott, stating that “this is emphatically not about calling for a boycott of Israel. We believe that would do nothing to advance the peace process. We oppose any such boycott of Israel. We believe consumers should be able to choose for themselves what produce they buy.”

Well, with the new bill, British policy seems to have become less categorical, perhaps through the realization that Britain needs Israel (trade between the two countries reached nearly $7 billion in 2014) and perhaps also throught the very late realization that British policies — or lack thereof — have stoked anti-Semitism in Britain, which has become a European center for the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement. British universities are hotbeds of anti-Semitism and recently The Algemeiner reported that the co-chairman of the Oxford University Labour Club, Alex Chalmers, had announced he was resigning over both rampant anti-Semitism and the group’s endorsement of Israel Apartheid Week on campus.

“Whether it be members of the Executive throwing around the term ‘Zio’ (a term for Jews usually confined to websites run by the Ku Klux Klan) with casual abandon, senior members of the club expressing their ‘solidarity’ with Hamas and explicitly defending their tactics of indiscriminately murdering civilians, or a former co-chair claiming that ‘most accusations of anti-Semitism are just the Zionists crying wolf,’ a large proportion of both OULC and the student Left in Oxford more generally have some kind of problem with Jews,” he wrote. The 12th annual Israel Apartheid Week is scheduled to kick off across UK campuses on Feb. 22.

The bill is a very welcome, albeit belated, initiative, which one might hope will be copied by other European nations, which are realizing that boycotting Israel is wrong — and bad for business.

Judith Bergman is a writer and political analyst living in Israel. This article was originally published by Israel Hayom.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Juan Rabinovits

    The “occupied territory of the West Bank” is not occupied. In 1948 israel was established as a national entity by the U.N. with Judea and Samaria as part of this sovereign state based on an international agreement signed by the government of Turkey and recorded in the Treaty of Lausanne which legalized the San Remo Accords. The government of Turkey as signatory to this binding treaty gave up all claim to its former territories and the Mandate for Palestine came into legal force. And thus ‘Jewish Palestine’ was established by the League of Nations on September 16th 1922 as Eretz-Israel when Israel was defined as the territory between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea by the Transjordan memorandum. This subsequent partition plan of 1947 was merely a proposal and totally rejected by the Arabs. It has no legal standing whatsoever. The San Remo agreement and the Treaty of Lausanne are Israel’s Magna Carta and are in full force to this day. No country may try to change the legitimate borders of another country by intimidation, coercion or force. BDS is absolutely illegal according to International law and for this reason it will be and is being struck down everywhere. BDS is finished.

  • Al Sundel

    There never was a country, province or village named Palestine, with indigenous people who called themselves Palestinians, until Yasser Arafat promoted the idea for a disputed territory. Not only in the Land of the Bible, but anywhere on our planet. They are truly an invented people, and remain a bum-and-beggar territory after the 5,000 years in the Land of the Bible that leading Palestinians wildly claim to have been there. Many in Europe and the UN have corrupt reasons for supporting the BDS movement when so many dictatorships in the world deserve this far more. From Arafat’s skyjacking to today’s knifings, they remain an outlaw culture like North Korea that truly needs to be policed.

Algemeiner.com