Thursday, December 14th | 26 Kislev 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

March 3, 2016 7:33 am

Marco Takes Minnesota and Finally Confronts a Dangerous Donald Trump

avatar by Heather Robinson

Email a copy of "Marco Takes Minnesota and Finally Confronts a Dangerous Donald Trump" to a friend
Presidential hopeful Marco Rubio. Photo: Gage Skidmore.

Presidential hopeful Marco Rubio. Photo: Gage Skidmore.

Marco Rubio won the Minnesota Republican caucus on Tuesday — his first win in a bruising evening and primary season.

For the past several days, Rubio has taken the fight to Donald Trump. In doing so, I believe that Rubio has taken on the mantle of leadership of the Republican Party. A few thoughts about this.

As a political independent and a journalist, I take seriously the obligation to keep an open mind and not slam candidates out of personal bias. That said, some of the things Donald Trump has said and done in recent days are downright alarming.

Donald Trump has called for a “revision of libel laws” in this country — a frightful thought in a nation that champions the concept and value of freedom of speech. This value is probably the feature that most distinguishes the United States of America from any other nation that has ever existed in the history of the world, and yet the man who wants to “make America great again” doesn’t seem to respect this seminal part of America’s core identity.

Related coverage

September 19, 2016 6:32 am

Israel Is High on Medical Marijuana - Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes Israeli entrepreneurs succeed because they challenge authority, question everything and don’t play by the rules. “The...

He has on numerous occasions issued veiled threats to reporters, and routinely maligns the press at his rallies (which is deeply ironic, since the media has helped facilitate Trump’s rise). He also drastically restricts the press at his rallies and has created an atmosphere in which violence against at least one reporter has occurred.

On Sunday, after a CNN reporter asked him three times to reject an endorsement from David Duke, a Ku Klux Klan leader and one of America’s leading antisemites, Trump declined to do so — then later blamed his failure on a malfunctioning earpiece.

At first I thought there was absolutely no way Trump could have possibly, knowingly declined to reject the support of a Ku Klux Klansman. It’s so incredibly outrageous and wicked that the natural response is to think that Trump must have misunderstood, or have been misunderstood.

Then, after Trump blamed his earpiece, I realized that the incident reminded me of other Trump denials: his abusive, sexist slur against Megyn Kelly (after which he denied that was what he meant) and his ridiculing of a disabled reporter (which he subsequently denied doing). He has a pattern of being boldly mean, even abusive, and then blatantly denying the obvious intent behind the behavior — and expecting everyone to give him a pass. And, time and time again, his supporters do.

As someone who knows and loves a few Trump supporters, I think they are attracted to other elements of his personality. Those elements include Trump’s business acumen, and his independence, or the fact that because of his great wealth he is less beholden to special interests than most politicians. Also, many of them believe Trump has the best chance among the Republican contenders to beat Hillary Clinton in a general election (I’m not sure why they believe this as multiple polls show Rubio actually does better against her among the general electorate than Trump does).

But I do understand what some voters see in him: his independence and obvious skill at having amassed and managed a fortune. I don’t think people’s support for Trump makes them chumps. But count me among those who believe that his emergence, and the massive following he has generated — who time and again forgive him some truly vicious statements and autocratic, un-American behavior (I’m talking about veiled threats toward reporters who simply ask tough questions and tacit acceptance of the endorsement of the KKK) — are disturbing.

There is some truth to Rubio’s line of attack: that Trump is, in a sense, a con artist.

It is literally true in terms of ventures like “Trump University.” It also contains truth in that many of Trump’s ideas, such as rounding up and deporting every illegal immigrant in the US, including children — and monitoring all Muslims — are unrealistic and impossible to implement, and against some of America’s most treasured values. He is a smart enough man to know this, and yet he keeps repeating this hyperbole over and over to demagogue the crowds. And by the way, his statements reveal how little he thinks of some of his own supporters.

Anyway, Marco Rubio made a splash last night in the Minnesota caucus, achieving a hard won victory after several days of attacking Trump, at times on substance and at times on style.

Someone had to stand up to the bully, and Rubio stepped up. It was long overdue. But better late than never.

As Rubio put it this week, “Why wouldn’t [Donald Trump] condemn the Ku Klux Klan? There is no room in the conservative movement and there is no room in the Republican Party for members of the Ku Klux Klan or racists like David Duke.”

Sounds like a winning, as opposed to a whining, message to me.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Marylin Pitz

    Enjoyed the insights into this endlessly surprising primary season. Fascinating to see what appears to be a revolution, or at the least, a considerable groundswell of change a la Donald Trump. I, along with you, find his candidacy alarming. Thanks for the thoughtful article.

  • Hi Emanuel–
    Thanks for reading my piece, and for your comments. Re: Trump disavowed David Duke and the KKK, yes, he did after the fact, and after blaming a bad earpiece. Trump’s claim that he couldn’t hear during the interview with Jake Tapper – despite Trump himself clearly articulating the words “David Duke” and “white supremacists” (please see link defies plausibility. I don’t personally believe Trump is a hard core white supremacist and I do not know why he would fail to articulate a clear disavowal during the interview, especially since he had disavowed Duke and the KKK in the past (please see link) My point is that this incident – in this case, failing to stand up against something vile – is consistent with a pattern in which Trump does something offensive to human decency, then simply denies what was obviously his intention, offering a completely far fetched excuse, and some of his supporters either believe him or just refuse to hold him accountable. I actually like some of Trump’s qualities, like his independence, and have mixed feelings about him. But it is this inability, on the part of some of his supporters, to examine any of his actions or statements critically and to suspend rational observation that is Orwellian, and disturbing. That said, yes he has condemned David Duke and the KKK in the past and did so considerably after his failure to do so despite being very clearly asked to do so three times in the interview. Thanks for the feedback. HR

  • Emanuel

    Deporting illegal immigrants is the law loser. The nsa has been spying on Americans so why is it unrealistic ? For law school I went to a diploma mill and I can tell you if Trump U were a scam at least 25% of the students would agree it’s a scam but not even 1% complain while every other real estate investing program are not being singled out this is selective enforcement and its equating for profit diploma mills with books and videos Trump sold to educate people.

  • Emanuel

    Yea jerk when you knowingly or carelessly publish false or misleading information about a public figure it’s libel. Trump denounced the KKK about 15 times publicly 3 times on Tuesday alone and your overpaid punk butt didn’t bother to check did you?