Journalist Blatantly Wrong About Avigdor Lieberman and Two-State Solution
An op-ed by Rachel Shabi (a frequent Guardian contributor) published in the Independent on May 30, included the following claim concerning the position of Israel’s new defense minister, Avigdor Lieberman, on the issue of the two-state solution.
The man now in charge of the Israeli army and the military occupation of Palestinians in the West Bank…has vowed there will never be a Palestinian state.
However, the claim that Lieberman vowed “there will never be a Palestinian state” ignores positions that he’s taken consistently since 2009 — covered widely in the media — that he supports the creation of a Palestinian state.
He wrote, in a letter to the New York Jewish Week in early 2009, that he “advocates the creation of a viable Palestinian state.” A month later, he told Time magazine that he would evacuate his own home in the settlement of Nokdim if a peace agreement with the Palestinians is reached.
In fact, even the Independent, in a July 17, 2012, report by Catrina Stewart (“Could corruption trial stop the rise of the black sheep of Israeli politics?”), acknowledged that Lieberman supports a two-state solution.
Since his appointment as defense minister, other media outlets have matter-of-factly noted his support for two states. For instance, a May 25 BBC article on Lieberman’s position noted that he “favours a two-state solution.”
In fact, on the day Shabi’s op-ed went online at the Indy, Lieberman gave a press conference at which he re-affirmed his support for a two-state agreement.
While commentators are free to criticize Lieberman, express skepticism over his sincerity in supporting two states, or question the morality of what’s known as “The Lieberman Plan,” Shabi’s claim that he “vowed there would never be a Palestinian state” is simply inaccurate. Per the Accuracy Clause of the Editors’ Code, the passage should be revised to more accurately reflect this fact.