Friday, March 23rd | 7 Nisan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

July 22, 2016 3:25 am

Conversion Confusion

avatar by Jeremy Rosen

Email a copy of "Conversion Confusion" to a friend
A synagogue celebration. Photo: Karel Valansi.

A synagogue celebration. Photo: Karel Valansi.

We know well enough by now that the status of conversions to Judaism is an unholy, inconsistent, politicized and often corrupt mess. As a people and as a religion we are just as confused, inconsistent and illogical as any other. I am referring to the chaos that reigns within what is confusingly and illogically called Orthodoxy.

According to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Israel’s highest rabbinical court recently rejected a conversion performed by prominent American Modern Orthodox rabbi Haskel Lookstein, upholding the decision of a lower rabbinical court. The Supreme Rabbinical Court had held two appeal hearings on the rejection of the woman’s conversion by the Petach Tikvah Rabbinical Court, where she had applied for marriage registration with her Israeli fiancé.

Naturally this case has attracted extra publicity, because Lookstein was the rabbi who arranged for Donald Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, to receive an Orthodox conversion so that she could marry Jared Kushner. It would look very bad, just as the Republican National Convention appoints Trump as their candidate, for rabbis to suddenly cast aspersions on his daughter’s conversion. Yet it does raise the issue of what the criteria for an Orthodox conversion are.

The episode illustrates the political tensions that exist in Israel between local rabbinic courts, the Supreme Rabbinic Court and the Chief Rabbinate, each vying for power, and each believing it has the right to decide. So a conversion recognized in one area might not be in another. There is nothing new about this; local courts and authorities often refuse to recognize other decisions in the same country, let alone other nations. In Israel it has been particularly prevalent, because nationalist rabbis are too Zionist for haredi rabbis, who are too fundamentalist and anti-Zionist for Modern Orthodox rabbis. Both agree that Conservative and Reform rabbis are not “real” rabbis.

In 2013, the Chief Rabbinate rejected, then later accepted, a conversion by New York rabbi Avi Weiss, who founded the liberal Yeshivat Chovevei Torah. Last year it threatened to revoke the appointment of American-born rabbi Shlomo Riskin, who advocates progressive Orthodox policies as Chief Rabbi of the West Bank settlement of Efrat. This is all too typical of religious political infighting, using theology as a smokescreen for power politics.

Conversion has been a problem ever since — 2,000 years ago — Hillel took a lenient and inclusive attitude, and Shammai preferred to be strict and exclusive. It did not help when Christianity and Islam both made converting to Judaism a capital offense. But what distinguishes Judaism from the others is that it sees no point in trying to evangelize, so long as other peoples and religions are living ethical lives. Don’t convert if you don’t want to keep all the rules. Stay as you are. The criterion the Talmud laid down, and the one that remains imbedded in Jewish law, is that the only basis for conversion is that one wishes to join the Jewish people and live a life according to the Torah. Naturally each denomination defines Torah in its own way.

To this day we have two distinct attitudes even within Orthodoxy: the lenient and the strict. Most of my rabbinic life was spent in the UK, where the authorities took a strict line and would refuse to accept any conversion for ulterior motives, such as to get married. They refused to accept conversions from Israel, South Africa, and the US, where they thought the rabbis were too lenient. You could be Orthodox in Johannesburg, but not able to join an Orthodox synagogue in London.

I was amazed to discover cases in the UK where an Orthodox conversion could be arranged if you were very rich and well-connected. I was shocked to discover how easy it was to get converted in different parts of the US under different officially Orthodox rabbis, where there was no centralized authority. And I was scandalized to discover that in Israel there were rabbinic courts that would convert very easily, particularly if you crossed their palms with silver. There are still too many cowboys on both sides of the Atlantic. The situation is a mess wherever you are, and almost whoever you are, and I feel so sorry for innocent people who are misled by rabbis who do not tell them the truth about their status. Even in Hassidic circles what is allowed in one court may be refused in another.

Yet in one way the chaos is good. At least there are options, possibilities, alternatives and the chance of finding someone in authority who might come down on your side. The advantage of one all-powerful authority is that, like the Pope, you have infallibility. The disadvantage is that if they come down against you, that is the end of the road. There are not too many Orthodox rabbis whom I know, in whom I would have the confidence, or about whom I would be happy to see have the power to decide for us all. It is not their scholarship I worry about, so much as their ability to foreswear politics and power. So I am glad that there are other options.

You have two contrasting models in Judaism today: the centralized Israeli state religious model, and the laissez-faire, uncontrolled American model. It is indeed tightening up now that pressure has been brought to bear. But there are still cowboys! Neither system is perfect. Many of the conflicts in Israel arise because one model seeks to impose its view on the other. This is always going to be a political battle. But in such situations, you do find good men and women working hard to resolve the conflicts — like Rabbi Seth Farber, founder of ITIM, an organization that helps Israelis navigate Israeli religious bureaucracy. Or Tzohar, a movement of moderate, tolerant Orthodox rabbis within the state system. Or Rav Aaron Leibowitz of Hashgaca Pratit. They do a magnificent job that goes some way to redress the ethical balance.

You might say this all gives the Orthodox establishment a bad name. Orthodoxy will reply that it doesn’t care. It has its principles. Besides, “what have the Romans ever done for us?” But if, as the Torah says, we are supposed to be an example to the world of an ethical, moral system that brings us recognition for our sensitivity and spirituality, we really need to see the damage that is being done by not having a clear policy, one way or another. Meanwhile, if Ivanka keeps Shabbat, I am definitely on her side!

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Jay Lavine

    If any convert (unidentified lest anyone make a pejorative inference) observes Shabbat and eats kosher food, especially vegetarian food, that’s wonderful, but we shouldn’t stop there. The litmus test should be how the individual follows the ethical precepts of Judaism, which are embodied in “v’ahavta lerei’acha kamocha.” This is the essence of Judaism, and not being concerned with that is part of the whole corruption problem.

    Yes, rabbis should be exemplars for the world, but they should also be role models for Jews, who may not only listen to their words but may also learn how they tie and untie their shoes (but perhaps stopping short of hiding under their mentor’s bed as Rav Kahana did!).

    How, then, do we get rid of all the corruption — monetary, political, and otherwise? It not only engenders a disrespect for the rabbinate but also turns people off to Judaism, the worst consequence of all.

    Think of the ancient Jewish communities that depended on a rabbinic authority to make sure that laws enacted by the Council did not constitute a “tyranny of the majority.” Common values and trust in the rabbinate were necessary for that system to succeed. But today, “Jewish,” as in the ideological/political term “Jewish state,” means something very different from what it did back then.

    If China can have an anti-corruption movement, why can’t Jews? Let’s take back Judaism!!

  • Rob

    How the conversions by those Orthodox rabbis be “rejected”? That would be a non-sequitur. Rabbis do not perform conversion. Conversion is done by a beis din. For thousands of years, marrying into or otherwise joining a community requires folowing that community’s standards for conversion, and that is still the case. The assertion of damage of “not having a clear policy” is invalid in this case. GPS policy is a clear policy. The convert in the recent story needed her conversion investigated like every other non-GPS and non-Rabbinate conversion. The rabbinic court investigation from scratch would not be completed until after the woman’s scheduled wedding date, so the court, apparently sufficiently satisfied with her acceptance and performance of mitzvot, but needing a formality, offered giyur l’chumra (an expedited conversion for to be sure) so as to allow her scheduled wedding to take place. Ivanka Trump’s conversion was apparently done via GPS, so there was no problem with her or Rabbi Lookstein. I expect reporters on such matters to have a little more knowledge of subject matter and use a little more logic.

  • Joel

    The concern about the Chief Rabbinate is not their standards of their own enforcement but the single-mindedness that their way is the only way – effectively, negating the Talmudic dictum of 70 faces to the Torah.

    Rambam states that if someone says that he is a Jew, he is to be believed and accepted as such. Sadly, the Chief Rabbinate’s policy is to deny testimony of G-d fearing Orthodox Rabbis that same benefit on behalf of those whose conversion they performed.

    Better that the Chief Rabbinate should ask whether the conversion was defensible based upon acceptable parameters that have long been established by Halachah rather than their own preferred view.