Saturday, May 27th | 2 Sivan 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
October 6, 2016 10:36 am

The New York Times’ Obsession With Settlements Means It Misses Other News

avatar by Ira Stoll

Email a copy of "The New York Times’ Obsession With Settlements Means It Misses Other News" to a friend
Homes in the Beit Aryeh Ofarim settlement. Photo: wiki commons.

Homes in the Beit Aryeh Ofarim settlement. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

One of the ways the New York Times shows its bias against Israel is with decisions on the placement of stories.

The latest example comes with the newspaper’s decision to print a news article, above the fold on page one, about a flap between the Obama administration and the Israeli government over a West Bank settlement.

I’d argue that this doesn’t really amount to “news” much at all. American governments have been critical of West Bank settlements for decades. Israeli governments, meanwhile, have for decades supported allowing Israeli Jews to live in the West Bank. Jews have a long historical and religious connection there. Jewish settlements provide a security buffer in the Jordan valley. They provide affordable housing and a security buffer around the Israeli capital at Jerusalem. And the existing Jewish population in the settlements needs room to grow.

Related coverage

May 26, 2017 12:03 pm
0

From Greeley, Colorado to Manchester, England

JNS.org - For those -- like me -- who’d never really given any thought to singer Ariana Grande before the terrorist atrocity at her concert...

Yet the Times editors place the “United States Criticizes Israel Over West Bank Settlement Plan” headline at the top of page one, judging it to be bigger news than a bunch of other stories in the day’s paper that did not make it onto the  front page at all — including the approach of Hurricane Matthew, the end of cash tolls at New York City bridges and tunnels, the selection of a new secretary-general of the United Nations and the announcement of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

The Times is so obsessed with the settlement issue that it follows up the front-page story with another long one online — it will probably make the print newspaper sometime in the next few days — headlined, “West Bank Settlers Prepare for Clash, With Israeli Government.” That article is about the prospect that the Israeli government will force the evacuation of 40 families from Amona.

Unfortunately for Times readers who are counting on the newspaper to deliver an accurate portrayal of the world, the newspaper’s focus on the settlement issue comes at the expense of excellence when it comes to other issues that are probably more significant.

For example, the White House made a stunning insult to Israel and to world Jewry by issuing a “corrected” press release deleting the word “Israel” from its description of the location of the Mount Herzl cemetery in Jerusalem, the site of President Obama’s remarks at the funeral of Shimon Peres. The Times handled this not with a full-length news article, much less a front-page, above-the-fold one, but instead with a single paragraph all the way at the end of an article about the funeral. The fact that the Obama White House can’t even acknowledge that Shimon Peres was buried in Israel says so much. As Elliott Abrams wrote on his blog at the Council on Foreign Relations web site, the site “lies in Western Jerusalem, near Yad Vashem and Jerusalem Forest…only those who seek to destroy Israel think this place will ever be anything but a part of the Jewish State.”

As for the Washington Free Beacon’s scoop that there are three written agreements between the US and Iran’s intelligence ministry that are being kept secret from the public in a secure reading room on Capitol Hill — well, nothing about that in the Times, either. But in terms of the prospects for peace in the Middle East and for the security of Israel and America, that’s a much bigger and more important deal than any nonsense the Times is peddling about West Bank settlements.

More of Ira Stoll’s media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found here. 

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Ted Crawford

    The NYT is, obviously, a puppet propaganda machine for the Obama administration. They call on Obama to be hard on Israel because Obama calls on them to call on him to be hard on Israel. It’s all theatrics; the tail wagging the dog.

  • joshua82

    “More of Ira Stoll’s media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found here.” (the link is to http://www.algemeiner.com/author/ira-stoll/)

    No, it can’t be found there. The link is broken; there aren’t any of Ira’s columns there. I wish that Ira’s columns could be found there, because that would make it easier to find them, and Ira’s columns are the main thing I am interested in at Algemeiner.com. I’m surprised that nobody at Algemeiner has noticed that this link has been broken for a couple of weeks now.

    • algemeiner

      Hi Joshua82, the link seems to be working now.

  • watsa46

    The US Pravda has nothing else to chew!

  • scottrose

    I cancelled my subscription to the New York Times on Monday of this past week, on the first day of Rosh Hashanah because on that day, the Times published an op-ed smearing Shimon Peres by the Palestinian Hanan Ashwari, who in the past has voiced support for Islamic terror attacks. The New York Times editorial board is despicable.

  • diana

    I live abroad, can somebody start a petition to cancel NYT subscriptions?

Algemeiner.com