Tuesday, October 17th | 27 Tishri 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
October 10, 2016 7:29 am

The Dangers of Demanding the Quick Creation of a Palestinian State

avatar by Stephen M. Flatow / JNS.org

Email a copy of "The Dangers of Demanding the Quick Creation of a Palestinian State" to a friend
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shaking hands. Photo: Twitter.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Photo: Twitter.

JNS.org –  Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas suffered chest pains this week, and was rushed to a hospital in Ramallah. The episode was an important reminder of the dangers and risks Israel will face if it heeds demands for the quick creation of a Palestinian state.

In recent weeks, the S. Daniel Abraham Center has been sponsoring full-page ads in the New York Times calling for a Palestinian state. The Obama administration also recently issued an overheated condemnation of Israel for approving the construction of a handful of houses for Jews in Judea and Samaria, because that construction might interfere with the emergence of a Palestinian state. And there have been reports that the United Nations, perhaps with the support of President Obama, will soon issue a new Palestinian statehood resolution.

Abbas is 81 years old. His recent heart episode illustrated the fragility of his health. And at his age, if it’s not his heart, it will soon be something else. One of these days, and it won’t be long, he will no longer be physically able to govern the Palestinian Authority (PA).

So, let’s imagine for a moment if Israel were to listen to Obama, the UN and S. Daniel Abraham and permit the creation of a fully sovereign Palestinian state. And then imagine if, shortly after signing a statehood agreement with Israel, Abbas is incapacitated. What would follow?

Related coverage

October 16, 2017 4:55 pm
0

Trump Should End the Iran Nuclear Deal

On the day when Jews were celebrating Simchat Torah, US President Donald Trump was making history by speaking boldly against the...

There are, I think, two possibilities.

The most likely scenario is that the terror group Hamas would take over. It has the troops and weapons needed for a coup. Hamas already defeated Abbas’ Fatah forces when they took over Gaza nine years ago. And Hamas has widespread support among ordinary Palestinians, judging from the results of the few elections that Abbas had permitted over the years.

So Hamas, which openly advocates the annihilation of Israel and the genocide of Israel’s 6.4 million Jews, would be in control of a full-fledged state with borders straddling Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.

The new Hamas regime could bring in tanks and planes, not to mention missiles from North Korea, and “volunteer” troops from Iran. A lone Hamas terrorist with a shoulder-fired rocket would be within striking distance of planes taking off from Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion Airport. Perhaps after he brought down a plane or two, the UN would pass a resolution expressing concern about “the escalation of Israeli-Palestinian violence.”

The other scenario would involve some non-Hamas official from the PA succeeding Abbas. Now, if Abbas had spent the past 23 years since the signing of the Oslo Accords educating the Palestinian public to embrace peace, perhaps there would be a chance of a peace-minded leader emerging to succeed him.

But instead, PA schools became anti-Israel indoctrinating centers, PA summer camps were used for teenage military training, and the official PA news media saturated Palestinian society with glorification of terrorists as “heroes” and “martyrs.” PA cartoonists drew images of Jews that rivaled those of the worst antisemites through the ages. Then-Senator Hillary Clinton called the PA’s anti-Jewish education “child abuse.”

Considering the ideas and values that the Abbas regime has propagated for 23 years, which scenario is more likely: that his successor will be moderate, reasonable and devoted to coexistence with Israel — or that his successor will be extreme, violent and dedicated to destruction of the Jewish state?

One can understand why the Obama Adminiatration, the S. Daniel Abraham Center and J Street have in effect adopted “Quick, give him a state!” as their motto. If Abbas doesn’t get a state right away, he may not be around to get it at all. And then Israelis (and American Jews) would see, once and for all, how foolhardy it would be to put Israel’s fate in the hands of unstable Palestinian dictators.

Stephen M. Flatow, an attorney in New Jersey, is the father of Alisa Flatow, who was murdered in an Iranian-sponsored Palestinian terrorist attack in 1995.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Sasb1053

    The Dangers of a Quick Palestinian State.
    Are you kidding me? This has been going on since 1948. Is that quick? It started with the Balfoure Declaration in 1917 and the British Mandate in 1920. The Indiginous populations were screwed from the start. The British as gave the European Jewish immigrants that amounted to 10% of the inhabitants here to get 55% of the land. The Palestinians or Indiginous people got 45%. The Europeans were not even Hebrews. Israel hasn’t existed for almost 1900 years. Should we revive countries or empires after 1900 years? Why did the Indiginous populations have to assimilate to a European Jewish culture? Imagine if Arabs went to the US or Europe and demanded that these countries convert to an Arab culture and law.

Algemeiner.com