Friday, May 26th | 1 Sivan 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
November 8, 2016 2:13 pm

Palestinians Call US Election ‘Choice Between Stupid and Evil,’ as Arab World Dismisses Presidential Powers, Attacks American Foreign Policy

avatar by Ruthie Blum

Email a copy of "Palestinians Call US Election ‘Choice Between Stupid and Evil,’ as Arab World Dismisses Presidential Powers, Attacks American Foreign Policy" to a friend
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton denounced the Tel Aviv terrorist attack. Photo: Gage Skidmore via Wikimedia Commons.

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Photos: Gage Skidmore via Wikimedia Commons.

The presidential election underway in the United States is a contest between “evil and stupid, [and] and you can choose which is which,” a Palestinian Authority spokesman based in Ramallah told the news site BuzzFeed on Monday.

This sentiment was echoed in one form or another by an official from Hamas, the terrorist organization ruling the Gaza Strip, and media outlets across the Muslim-Arab world.

“We do not see any difference between Democrats and Republicans when it comes to dealing with the Palestinian issue,” Yihya Musa, a Hamas member of the Palestinian Parliament, told BuzzFeed News. “So whether [Donald] Trump wins or Hillary [Clinton]…both parties [back] Israel and its policies against the Palestinians.”

Related coverage

May 26, 2017 11:53 am
0

Islamist Gunmen Forced Egyptian Christians to Recite Muslim Prayer Before Execution, Survivors Say

Islamist gunmen who murdered at least 26 Christians traveling on a bus on Friday in central Egypt forced their victims...

According to the Washington, DC-based Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), the Arab press holds a similarly cynical view of the candidates in particular and the United States in general.

The Arab world digital news and opinion website Raialyoum.com, MEMRI reported on Tuesday, stated in an editorial last week that,

While no public opinion polls [have been conducted] in the Arab world regarding the US presidential election, the responses of Arabs to the race give the initial impression that a large portion of them prefer a Trump victory. However, this is not due to their love of [Trump] or hatred of his opponent, Hillary Clinton. Rather, it is because they have no sympathy for the US and would like to see Obama replaced by a president who will lead it to collapse and disintegration…

The editorial continued:

Republican nominee Donald Trump, who is portrayed as a racist populist, has based the agenda of his campaign on hostility towards Muslims and on the building of a wall on the Mexican border to stem the flow of immigrants…

It seems that Miss Clinton is even more hostile to Arabs and Muslims than Trump, and many believe she will continue the policy adopted by President Obama during his two terms…

The Jewish lobby staunchly backs Clinton, throws its full financial and political weight behind her, and utilizes its media outlets to support her out of the belief that she supports its interests, namely Israel’s military and political superiority… It is sad that Arabs, who suffer the most from American policy…have become the “punching bag” at which the presidential candidates direct the full force of their aggressive punches.

An editorial in the Saudi daily Al-Riyadh, according to MEMRIstated: “Clinton is likely to be more empathetic to our problems than Trump will be, but this does not necessarily mean that she is on our side any more [than he is]. This is because US foreign policy is not based on a president’s personal initiatives, but on complex long-term considerations that are implemented in stages without deviation from what was set out [in the beginning]. Therefore, the US president has little room to maneuver, and he can make no decisions on his own…”

In an op-ed in the London-based Saudi daily Al-Hayat, editor-in-chief Ghassan Charbel wrote,

…Today, Middle Eastern countries feel the absence of the role that the US used to play — never mind that they complained about it at the time. The US has withdrawn unprecedentedly from [from the Middle East]. Russia receives legitimacy for its military bases on Syrian soil, and attacks oppositionists before it attacks terrorists. The [Russian] warships gather, signs of [coming] wrath, and Emperor [Putin] bathes in the blood and warm waters [of the Mediterranean]…

There is no sign that the American policeman is returning to the Middle East. If she wins, Hillary Clinton might slightly slow the withdrawal, but if Trump wins, there will be more of a global problem than a Middle East problem. The US is the US, even if its halo and its greed to run the world are on the wane…

In an op-ed in the London-based daily Al-Arabi Al-Jadid, aligned with the Qatari regime, editor Houssam Kanafani wrote,

…regardless of which [president] resides in the White House, American policy is not subject to change on the whims of this or that person…However, this does not mean that Trump’s arrival at the White House would be the same as Clinton’s. It is certain that the insanity of the Republican candidate will impact American presidential conduct, especially on the domestic level, and particularly with regard to the economy. This is because candidate [Trump’s] background is that of a businessman who sees politics through the prism of profits, and this will shape what changes Trump can implement, especially in policies regarding social services, oil, and other things that could affect economic relations with [U.S.] allies, but not the alliances themselves. The same goes for Clinton, who will follow in Obama’s footsteps on these matters…

With regard to the Arab countries, especially those that are burning like Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, no one expects a substantial change in American policy, whether Trump or Clinton [wins]…

Comments from the Palestinian Authority and the Arab world come in response to arguments among US pundits over which of the two presidential candidates are most favorable in the eyes of Middle Easterners. They also come on the heels of claims on the part of the Clinton campaign that Russia was behind the hacking of the former secretary of state’s server, with the goal of securing a Trump victory.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Michael Millett

    Apparently, the ‘Palestinians’ like to talk about themselves.

  • Victoria poupko

    Much is wrong in this article. Clinton is, I agree, evil, But Trump is not stupid at all. He is great to withstand a massive jackal attack of the highly corrupt establishment, Obama atop. His ideas and plans are very impressive and his plan to brake the lie, hypocrisy and corruption in the WH is wonderful. It is in HIS power to dramatic change the political system (including the foreign policy -of hatred to Israel. Hillary, who has no idea about economy and true foreign policy will follow and even worsen the Obama politics. It is very scared. She will make another wars outside of USA because wars is the biggest source of money (almost the only Clinton’s interest). She may destroy America and force Israel to dangerous (fot it) steps. Its not clear about her politics w/ Russia. In all cases, in all senses, the highly criminal Hillary is evil.

  • SteveC1

    Absolutely! After all, EVERYBODY knows how egalitarian, well-balanced, fair, well-informed and generally “advanced” Arab, Palestinan and Persian politics are 😉

  • Lancelot Blackeburne

    Perhaps this statement from the Palestinians will prompt the incoming US President, whichever candidate wins, to cut off all aid to the Palestinian Authority.

    Why support people who consider you stupid or evil, or possibly both?

  • Gnomercy9 ✓Jewish

    The PAPLO owns Obama ideologically, but they must buy Clinton.

  • SAWolf

    The arabs are just jealous. They’ve got the terrorist abbas, in the 11th year of his 4 year term and brutal hamas, who will never surrender power. Life is good when you’re an American.

  • Reb_Yaakov

    Is there no one in the Arab world holding a different view who might have been interviewed?

Algemeiner.com