Tuesday, July 5th | 7 Tammuz 5782

December 8, 2016 4:52 am

Keith Ellison’s Views on Israel Reflect the Democrats’ True Colors

avatar by Abraham H. Miller / JNS.org

US Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) speaks at a Hillary Clinton campaign event at the University of Minnesota in October 2016. Photo: Lorie Shaull via Wikimedia Commons.

US Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) speaks at a Hillary Clinton campaign event at the University of Minnesota in October 2016. Photo: Lorie Shaull via Wikimedia Commons.

JNS.org — Haim Saban is wrong when he says Minnesota’s US Rep. Keith Ellison is unqualified to head the Democratic National Committee. Ellison’s anti-Israel and antisemitic lineages do not disqualify him from the position. They more than qualify him.

It is Ellison, not Saban — the Israeli-American mega-donor to both the Democratic Party and pro-Israel causes — who represents the Democrats’ true colors. The party has been abandoning support for the Jewish state for well over a decade. Recent studies by BrookingsGallup and Pew reveal a growing gap of support for Israel between Democrats, Independents and Republicans. Israel — an issue that should never be partisan — is strongly supported by Republicans and independents. Democrats? Not so much.

When there are anti-Israel demonstrations and antisemitic activities on our college campuses, it is not the Young Republicans declaring allegiance to the US-designated terrorist group Hamas. Progressives are chanting, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” This call for the destruction of Israel and murder of the Jewish people comes from Leftist groups, not Christian organizations.

Democrats generate more sackcloth and ashes over a Jew building an extra bathroom in eastern Jerusalem than an Iranian building a nuclear device in Tehran. This is the party that remains silent over the murder of gays in Iran and inhumane treatment of women in Saudi Arabia, while condemning Israel when they defend their citizens from rocket attacks launched from Gaza.

Related coverage

July 5, 2022 11:47 am

Anti-Israel Academics Attack the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism in Hate-Filled Webinar

On May 8, 2022, the Institute for Holocaust Studies, Genocide and Remembrance at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, posted a...

President Barack Obama supported the Muslim Brotherhood while it forcibly imposed a sharia law-oriented government on the Egyptian people. This is the party that was virtually silent as the Islamist government of Mohammed Morsi persecuted and murdered Coptic Christians. This is the party that wanted Morsi’s regime restored after millions of Egyptians took to the streets to demand his removal.

When the Egyptian military, under former military leader and current President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, took control of the government from the Islamists, the Obama administration still clung to the Islamists.

This is the party that overthrew the stable government of Libya and gave us a failed state that now serves the interests of the Islamists and has become an open door for Muslim refugees fleeing to Europe.

On Jan. 21, 2009, Agence France-Presse reported that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s spokesman, Nabil Abu Rudeineh, quoted the newly elected President Obama as saying, “This is my first phone call to a foreign leader and I’m making it only hours after I took office.”

In view of the palpable anti-Israel and antisemitic vitriol that permeates large segments of the Democratic Party, the question that I am most commonly asked by intelligent, politically astute gentiles is, how can Jews continue to vote for the Democrats?

The answer is complicated. Most American Jews are Leftists first and Jews second. There is also a mistaken Jewish notion of tikkun olam, the responsibility to repair the world, which is invoked most frequently in Reform and Conservative denominational circles. In today’s America, tikkun olam has come to mean following Democratic policies of redistributing wealth.

Perhaps, with Ellison at its head, Jews will no longer be able to deny what the Democratic Party really stands for when it comes to issues that are crucial to their very existence as a people with both a spiritual and Zionist identity.

Saban is correct in his assessment of Ellison as an anti-Israel antisemite. But would Ellison really be a “disaster for the relationship between the Jewish community and the Democratic Party,” as Saban predicts? No. It would be more of wake-up call for a stiff-necked people.

Abraham H. Miller is an emeritus professor of political science, University of Cincinnati, and a distinguished fellow with the Haym Salomon Center. Follow him on Twitter @salomoncenter.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.