Tuesday, March 28th | 1 Nisan 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
February 1, 2017 9:14 am

Donald Trump’s Moral Harm

avatar by Sam Ben-Meir

Email a copy of "Donald Trump’s Moral Harm" to a friend
Donald Trump being sworn in as America's 45th president. Photo: Screenshot.

Donald Trump being sworn in as America’s 45th president. Photo: Screenshot.

During President Trump’s first full week in office, he began to dismantle America’s moral standing on the international stage. From his reconsideration of CIA “black sites,” to his insistence on vast voter fraud, to his inhumane ban on immigration from some Muslim countries, Trump seems to be intent on normalizing discredited policies, adhering to blatant falsehoods and waging an assault on human dignity.

To those who say, “It can’t happen here” — generally the same ones who said Trump would never become president — I say, “It is happening here.” We must guard against attempts to undermine the rule of law and our commitment to welcoming immigrants; we must not allow facts to be rewritten to support the administration’s chosen narrative. The only way to avoid compromising our fundamental principles is to actively and zealously defend them.

Trump is an authoritarian who has already begun to ride roughshod over the freedom of the press. Trump is successfully stoking the flames of a false populism based on discrimination, anti-immigration and a flamboyant disregard for truth and decency. The denial of anthropogenic climate change, for example, is part of Trump’s overall contempt for opinions or conclusions that, however well substantiated, do not agree with his nostalgic and dangerous agenda for this country.

Related coverage

March 27, 2017 6:50 am
0

New York Times Reviewer Insists Jihadist Attacks in US Are ‘Relatively Few’

Writing about a Showtime documentary titled “American Jihad,” a television reviewer for the New York Times reports that the film...

Trump’s epistemology, if we may call it that, reduces knowledge to perspective, a condition where everything is open to creative redescription. If we can propose alternative facts to the inauguration turnout, why need we stop there? Can we propose alternative facts to any objective description of reality? Perhaps a white supremacist would like to pose alternative facts to the history of American slavery. Are there alternative facts to the Holocaust waiting to be discovered? To truly defeat Trumpism, it will require, among other things, reinvigorating our commitment to things like truth, justification, objective evidence and warrant.

The banning of refugees is a cruel and inhumane policy; it is an attack on human dignity. It is un-American, un-Christian and un-Jewish. The most basic moral tenet of both Christianity and Judaism is the injunction to love thy neighbor. Jesus’ story of the Good Samaritan is especially timely now, because when we understand the story in context, we see that to love thy neighbor really means to love your enemy (the Samaritans and Jews hated each other).

I am not suggesting that we should open our borders to professed enemies; I’m saying that we must either be a nation that protects and nourishes dignity, righteousness and justice, or we must steadily sink into a new era of brutal policies — and on the other side of that lies a dark and perilous unknown.

Not only is the ban illegal, heavy-handed and grossly immoral, but it is also self defeating and lacks any logic whatsoever, forbidding entry from countries that have not harmed an American here in 40 years — including Iran, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Yemen, and Syria, while exempting countries, such as Saudi Arabia, which was the country of origin of most of the 9/11 terrorists. Nor should we overlook the fact that Trump has exempted countries where he happens to do business.

This ban is positively harmful to America, while at the same time revealing a depressing lack of psychological insight. It is characteristic of a narrow-minded and authoritarian personality. In the end, Trump’s ban will likely make us more enemies than it succeeds in protecting us from. It is as if he is going out of his way to generate outrage at American bigotry and cowardice.

For the ban is, indeed, a profound act of cowardice. It is certainly possible that a refugee may commit some violent crime in the US — we shouldn’t suppose they’re angels — but the question is whether we want to allow that fear to override our basic commitment to do what is right, not only ethically, but also in terms of our long-term interests as a nation.

Our long-term interests do not prescribe discrimination against people based on faith; our long-term interests do not prescribe turning our backs on those who have worked alongside American soldiers every step of the way; they do not prescribe turning away the best minds and promising talents because we’ve adopted inane views about their religion.

Our institutions are still stable — but that requires vigilance, resistance and sometimes defiance. Fortunately, the majority of Americans are opposed to Trump’s morally corrupt and craven immigration policy.

Although Trump has already succeeded in creating a degree of havoc all around the globe, what we need to begin to prepare for is the moment this president is truly tested. We cannot afford to let his administration play fast and loose with objective facts, to dismiss serious findings because they do not suit the president’s outsized ego. When Trump doubles down on a patent falsehood, he is actually debasing the most valuable currency we possess: namely, the truth.

The president has already inflicted significant moral harm through his rejection of basic manners and decency, his devaluation of objective inquiry, his readiness to fan the flames of resentment and his disregard of the plight of millions of refugees.

We need to continue to resist by every means at our disposal, lest he drag this country into the moral gutter.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • elskid

    I could not make it past… “inhumane ban on immigration from some Muslim countries”… before I reached my quota of “trying to forward an agenda by twisting reality via fake news”.
    “Inhumane”… give me a break!

Algemeiner.com