Tuesday, May 22nd | 8 Sivan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

March 28, 2017 6:50 am

New York Times Writes Jews Out of Crown Heights

avatar by Ira Stoll

Email a copy of "New York Times Writes Jews Out of Crown Heights" to a friend

Crown Heights, Brooklyn. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

The New York Times has finally achieved what not even the Crown Heights riot could accomplish: eradicating all trace of Jews or Judaism from that Brooklyn neighborhood.

A front-page New York Times news article about Mayor Bill de Blasio’s plan to open more homeless shelters in the city reports:

According to the lawsuit, the city is “foisting yet another” shelter on Crown Heights, a largely West Indian and African-American community, in order to avoid “the vocal criticism of the affluent and largely white citizenry” in other neighborhoods. The matter is to be heard before Justice Katherine A. Levine on Tuesday.

Though gentrifying, Crown Heights remains one of the city’s poorer neighborhoods…

The New York Times itself had accurately reported in its real estate section less than two years ago that the neighborhood “has a populous Lubavitcher Hasidic section.”

That same article, from 2015, also reported, “Single-family homes typically sell for around $800,000 to $1.5 million; two-family homes for $1.2 million to $1.7 million; three-family homes for $1.6 million to $2 million.” One of the city’s “poorer” neighborhoods, indeed.

The New York Jewish Week reported in a 2016 article about Crown Heights that there were approximately “23,800 Jews living there, according to UJA-Federation of New York’s 2011 population study.”

The Times article today doesn’t come right out and call the Jews of Crown Heights interlopers. It doesn’t acknowledge their presence at all. But it’s not difficult to draw that implication. Maybe it’s the lawsuit, not the Times, making the demographic characterization of the neighborhood, but if that is so, the distinction isn’t clear from the sentence in the Times. In any case, if it is the lawsuit making that false characterization, there is no reason for the Times to pass it along uncorrected.

It may seem like a small point. But consider the history of the violent antisemitic riot in the neighborhood in 1991 — a riot that, as former New York Times reporter Ari Goldman wrote, the Times itself failed to cover accurately. Is it really too much to ask today’s New York Times not to omit the Jewish presence from its description of the neighborhood?

Apparently, and unfortunately, it is.

More of Ira Stoll’s media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found here. 

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Steve Kohn

    At this stage of my life there is nothing about Judaism and Israel in the NYT that surprises me. If it picked on any other minority group it would be condemned. In our weird world being anti-Semitic and anti-Israel is a virtue not a vice.

  • Lia

    Mr Stoll, you’re a hero.

  • The New York Time doesn’t deliver to many neighborhoods considered part of NYC. So this doesn’t surprise me at all. Some years ago I taught in the Radio TV dept at Brooklyn college. The NY Times was offering profs a free subscription to sign our students up. However, the NY Times didn’t deliver to most of the neighborhoods where my students dwelled. It was an exercise in futility that I’ve never forgotten.

  • Alex Peshansky

    Anyone remember Canarsie? Another Brooklyn neighborhood where I remember visiting relatives in 1990s (yes, Jews, although they were in minority – it was mostly Italian) and leaving the car unlocked. Now it looks like Harlem used to in 1990s.

  • Art Frank

    Times is a left wing anti-Jew, anti-Israel rag. Use it to wipe your butt.