Monday, October 23rd | 3 Heshvan 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
April 9, 2017 9:42 pm

Jewish Enemies — Then and Now

avatar by Pini Dunner

Email a copy of "Jewish Enemies — Then and Now" to a friend

Former London mayor Ken Livingstone. Photo: Wiki Commons.

The issue of Jewish collaboration with the Nazis is probably the most challenging aspect of Holocaust history for Jews. The idea that Jews cooperated with their mortal enemies — and had a hand in the murder of their brethren — is abhorrent, and patently antithetical to the Jewish ethics that are the backbone of our longevity as a people. Sadly, what people are willing to do to survive is not always honorable, and the Holocaust era was no exception.

Anna van Dijk was a Dutch Jew, who helped the Nazis track down hidden Jews in Amsterdam, in exchange for her life. Her collaboration may have resulted in the death of as many as 700 Jews, including her own brother and his family. She was executed for war crimes in 1948.

Chaim Rumkowski was a Polish Jew appointed by the Nazis in 1939 to head the Jewish council in the Lodz ghetto. He eagerly cooperated with his overseers, turning the ghetto into a ruthlessly run labor camp, and provided the Nazis with lists of the young and elderly, or anyone he believed would not contribute to the productivity of the ghetto. Everyone on such a list was sent to their deaths, and Rumkowski knew it. According to at least one account, fellow Jews beat Rumkowski to death when he eventually arrived at Auschwitz in 1944, shortly after the Lodz ghetto was liquidated.

These are just two examples of the dark side of the Holocaust narrative, a side we would all prefer not to dwell on. People like Anna van Dijk and Chaim Rumkowski undoubtedly rationalized their collaboration by telling themselves that any Jew who died as a result of their cooperation with the Nazis would probably have died anyway.

Related coverage

October 22, 2017 1:22 pm
0

Israeli Government Cultivates Allies at First Christian Media Summit

JNS.org - Recognizing that it's easier to communicate with journalists who are prone to be supporters of Israel than those with a perceived anti-Israel bias, the Israeli...

In any event, the actions of a few individuals are hardly a collective indictment against the Jews of Europe, the vast majority of whom refused to engage with the Nazis at any level.

The issue becomes more complex, however, when we address the issue of Jewish organizational collaboration with the Nazis — in particular, the formal agreement in August 1933 between the Zionist leadership and the newly formed Nazi government. Known as the “Ha’avara Agreement,” the accord enabled German Jews to immigrate to Mandatory Palestine and export their possessions and other German goods there, which was also economically advantageous to the Nazis.

Although Hitler was not directly involved in the negotiations, he most certainly approved the final agreement, which resulted in the immigration of 60,000 Jews — among them, my great-grandparents and three of their children.

The Ha’avara Agreement was considered extremely controversial as soon as it was signed — long before the Nazis began to murder Jews in death camps. The agreement would later be used, along with other examples of official Zionist cooperation with Nazi authorities, as proof that the Zionist movement had lost its moral compass in its zeal to create a Jewish state.

This judgment is deeply flawed for a number of reasons — principally because hindsight is not a valid basis for condemnation. Over many centuries, Jews have negotiated with all kinds of vile despots and evil murderers to ensure Jewish survival.

What, then, are we to make of former London Mayor Ken Livingstone’s claim  that “when Hitler won his election in 1932 [sic] his policy then was that Jews should be moved to Israel … [Hitler] was supporting Zionism”? Earlier this week, Livingstone was suspended from the UK Labour Party for a year — although, remarkably, he was not expelled — because his remarks were found to be antsemitic, thereby damaging the reputation of the party.

Livingstone, like so many other antisemites and racists, is convinced that he is not guilty of any prejudice, and that those who are offended by what he said just don’t have his grasp of the facts. After all, he argues, even Jews have told him he’s right — as if the subjective views of some Jews is evidence of his innocence. Unfortunately, Livingstone has helped make it legitimate to synonymize Israel with Nazis in polite conversation.

Part of the Haggadah liturgy recited on Seder Night is the song “Vehi She’amdah”: “It is only this covenant that has stood for our ancestors and for us. It is not one enemy that has risen against us to wipe us out, but in every generation there have been those who have wanted to wipe us out — and God saved us from their hands.”

I have always been struck by the words “one enemy,” and the notion that our “covenant” and “God” have been our salvation. We usually see our enemies as the easily identifiable bad guys — Cossacks, Nazis, Islamic terrorists — but we are deluding ourselves. Enemies are not monolithic; they come in all shapes and sizes. Sometimes they appear in the form of public figures who cite “historical facts” while claiming to be our friend. Other times, they can appear as defenders of Palestinian rights who support a two-state solution. Whatever the case, we would do well to realize that we can only defend ourselves by our loyalty to the covenant, and by our faith in God.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • mikey248

    I had to do a double take on the photo for a moment–wasn’t sure if it was Soros or Livingstone–same difference.

  • Dan Sonnenschein

    The author’s account of Rumkowski is very distorted, including his
    failure to mention that the real master of the Lodz Ghetto was Hans
    Biebow of the Gestapo. For a less simplistic view, I recommend
    the Yad Vashem publication, “Reassessment of the Image of
    Mordechai Chaim Rumkowski” by Israeli historian Michal Unger,

  • Hard Little Machine

    Rumkowsky was more than a collaborator. He used his Nazi awarded position to sexually abuse young women and steal from other Jews.

  • Joseph Feld

    Allowing those leaving the country to take some of their possessions with them is the norm and not the exception. Collaboration in war time has a very different meaning and Ken is trying to associate Hitler with Zionism, as if Hitler supported Zionism, and alternatively that Zionists are Nazis. . Personally I deeply opposed Ken’s Labour Govt in London when they sold off school playing fields on the basis that competitive sports damage children. By the time we woke up and saw through this loony Left view of sports’ education, the increase in London real estate prices made it very difficult to regain playing fields.

  • Phil Lesh Fan

    The first thing which came to my mind, while reading this article, is the overwhelming number of American Jews who are members of the Democratic Party. That party is the Iran Nuclear Deal. That party is Obama’s last stand at the UN. That party is the plane load of cash which Obama sent to Iran. And American Jews are overwhelmingly supportive of all that that party does.

Algemeiner.com