Friday, August 12th | 15 Av 5782

May 15, 2017 10:52 am

Sarsour Doesn’t Pass ‘3D’ Antisemitism Test

avatar by Ariel Behar


Linda Sarsour (right). Photo: Screenshot.

Natan Sharansky, the former Soviet political prisoner and current Jewish Agency chairman, put forth a “3D test” to distinguish between criticism of Israel and antisemitism. Criticism crosses into antisemitism, he said, when it delegitimizes or demonizes Israel, or subjects the Jewish state to double standards. Thus, when Israel is cast as evil, when only Israel is held accountable in a conflict and when Israel’s fundamental right to exist as a Jewish homeland is questioned, criticism crosses into antisemitic territory.

Through her actions and statements about Israel and Jews, celebrity Islamist activist Linda Sarsour fails the “3D test.”

In a recent Newsweek article, Sarsour argued she has been labeled an antisemite because of her participation in the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement. “This is a deliberate attempt to smear me, as a prominent leader in the progressive movement,” she told the magazine. “They’re basically criminalizing and defaming my work calling for human rights in Palestine. They equate activism on Palestine with antisemitism and that is an unfortunate equation.”

“The reason why Israel gets singled out in this debate is because the majority of military aid … goes to Israel … which they use to occupy Palestinians,” Sarsour said in a radio interview last month on SiriusXM radio.

Related coverage

August 12, 2022 9:27 am

When Human Leaders Fail Us, God Is There

The Seven Years War of 1756-1763 was a brutal international military conflict that saw a total realignment of European strategic...

Sarsour’s answer was a self-serving attempt to divert attention away from her own words. It ignored her support of sharia law, her failure to denounce terrorism committed in the name of Islam, and her support for the violent Palestinian “resistance,” all of which aligns her with antisemitism.

Sarsour also tries to shut down those who cite her record of celebrating terrorists and advocating radical positions by calling these critics Islamophobes. “Linda Sarsour is a Palestinian Muslim American woman in a hijab and she has the audacity to be prominent in this country, the audacity to resonate with communities outside her community,” she said, speaking in the third person in the SiriusXM interview. “How dare I do that? How dare I defy every stereotype that Islamophobes have of me.”

Yet, she’s nakedly intolerant of beliefs other than her own.

Sarsour famously tweeted, “Nothing is creepier than Zionism.” That’s not a statement critical of the Israeli government or of settlement building in the West Bank. Instead, Sarsour believes the entire concept of a homeland for the Jewish people is flawed, and is “creepy.”

And Sarsour wants nothing to do with you if you believe in and support the State of Israel. That goes for Jews who might try to stand in solidarity against anti-Muslim bigotry. In her worldview, Zionism and feminism are mutually exclusive. “You either stand up for the rights of all women, including Palestinians, or none,” Sarsour told The Nation. “There’s just no way around it.”

“But insisting that Jews need not apply if they subscribe to the belief in a Jewish homeland in Israel is an antisemitic double standard,” StandWithUs researcher Lauren Post wrote in the Forward. “Too many leftists already ignore antisemitism unless it’s rhetorically convenient, so perhaps it’s unsurprising that Sarsour’s brand of feminism demands that we give up our liberation movement for some nebulous greater good.”

Women who disagree with Sarsour about feminism are met with profane attacks. She attacked ex-Muslim Ayaan Hirsi Ali, saying that she deserves an “a$$ whippin’,” and that she’d like to “take [Hirsi Ali and Islam critic Brigitte Gabriel’s] vaginas away — they don’t deserve to be women.”

New York State Assemblyman Dov Hikind (D-Brooklyn) called Sarsour out on her hypocrisy and double standards after she was invited to give a commencement speech at CUNY School of Public Health in Brooklyn. Hikind highlighted Sarsour’s dishonesty in a recent op-ed published in the New York Daily News.

“Until recently, she’d convinced a lot of people that she stood for progressive liberalism, stood for feminism, stood for dignity, human rights and all of the things that people who favor the liberal left say they stand for, too,” Hikind wrote.

“But there’s an old saying: You can’t hide the crazy.”

That “crazy” includes embracing Rasmea Odeh, a convicted terrorist whose participation in a 1969 grocery store bombing in Jerusalem killed two college students. Sarsour called it an honor to be in Odeh’s presence after Odeh announced her intention to plead guilty to naturalization fraud.

Sarsour “associates with terrorism and supports terrorism,” Hikind told the Investigative Project on Terrorism. “Her record, her involvement, her statements, is just beyond the pale. What kind of message does that send?”

It is not clear if Sarsour is feeling the heat or has other motivations, but she is orchestrating a broad campaign to insulate herself from questions of whether she fails the 3D test and is antisemitic.

When vandals desecrated a Jewish cemetery in St. Louis, Sarsour made sure everyone saw her helping raise money to repair the damage — even though those cemeteries likely included (shudder) Zionists. Still, her efforts garnered unquestioning national attention.

“This is another way for us to publicly defy the stereotype that Muslims and Jews are not communities that can get along,” she told National Public Radio.

Sarsour also appeared in a video produced by the anti-Israel group Jewish Voice for Peace, in which she said a “conversation on antisemitism is so critical at this moment.” But that good deed can’t be done without qualification, as she said accusations of antisemitism were often “used by the right wing against Palestinians and those who are pro-Palestine … [to say] that we are antisemitic, or because we’re critics of the State of Israel that means we are antisemitic.”

Antisemitism is a problem, she said in the video. It’s just not as bad as racism or anti-Muslim bigotry. Most Jews are white, after all, and therefore do not face systemic discrimination in employment or housing. “And we need to make that distinction.” Again, Sarsour offered a self-serving answer meant to define a problem on terms best suited for her. It was a gross misrepresentation that minimized the threat of antisemitism in America.

The latest FBI hate crime data, covering the year 2015, shows Jews are targeted more than twice as often as Muslims in hate crimes motivated by religious identity. In fact, Jews account for more than half of all hate crimes based on religion, with 664 documented incidents in 2015, compared to 257 targeting Muslims.

Generally speaking, activism is something worth celebrating. But Sarsour is notorious for her controversy and her double standards. And praising Sarsour as a “champion of change” does harm to the legitimate struggle for human rights, and the real fight against antisemitism. We need not embrace someone who defends and supports extremism in the name of social justice.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.