An UNRWA school holding a ceremony honoring and celebrating Palestinian stabbing attacks against Israelis. Photo: Facebook.

JNS.org – Why aren’t Muslim countries leading givers to the Palestinian cause? That question has renewed relevance after a United Nations agency’s recent release of its list of donors.

The UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) claims to provide aid to approximately five million Palestinian “refugees,” a number that is disputed by the pro-Israel community because UNRWA also serves refugees’ descendants.

UNRWA’s list of donors for 2016 says that Western countries and Japan are the most significant contributors to the agency’s budget, while the only major Muslim givers are Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Further, the Muslim nations’ giving lags behind top donors such as the US and European Union countries.

Ronen Yitzhak, the head of the Middle East Studies department at Israel’s Western Galilee College, told JNS.org that the discrepancy between Western and Arab-Muslim giving to the Palestinians “has been the case throughout the history of the [Israeli-Palestinian] conflict.”

On the Arab-Muslim side, “there is a lot of talking, but little actual deeds,” he said. Yizhak pointed out that after the 2014 Gaza war, the international community pledged $5 billion to rebuild the Hamas-ruled coastal enclave, but much of the money pledged by Arab states went undelivered.

Daniel Pipes, a historian and the president of the Middle East Forum think tank, explained the funding discrepancy by noting that given Arab and Muslim leaders’ belief that the West is to blame for the Palestinian refugees’ plight, they view funding UNRWA as “a Western responsibility, because the West backs Israel.”

UNRWA bias

Critics of UNRWA say that the international dollars invested in the UN agency serve to perpetuate the Palestinian conflict with Israel, particularly due to anti-Israel bias and incitement in UNRWA’s school curriculum, and its broad definition of what constitutes a Palestinian refugee.

Asaf Romirowsky, the executive director of the Scholars for Peace in the Middle East and the co-author of Religion, Politics, and the Origins of Palestine Refugee Relief, told JNS.org that if Palestinians gave up their identity as refugees, “it would feel as if they were giving up their Palestinian identity” as a whole.

“The perception within the Palestinian and larger Arab world is that the Palestinians have a divine right to return to Israel and that no leader has the mandate to ever give this up,” said Romirowsky, who is also a fellow at the Middle East Forum.

Romirowsky said that there is international pressure to keep the funds flowing to UNRWA despite the anti-Israel incitement in its textbooks and its alleged associations with Hamas.

And the refugee issue, according to Romirowsky, is a tool used for bashing Israel — and justifying UNRWA’s existence.

“UNRWA says they are needed until a resolution of the conflict,” he said, “but in fact they are gatekeepers that ensure there will be no resolution, with Palestinian refugees being the only ones in the world kept in [the position of being refugees] for perpetuity.”