Monday, January 30th | 9 Shevat 5783

July 7, 2017 10:07 am

Former Israeli Security Officials Duel Over Palestinian Authority Terror Payments

× [contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

avatar by Adam Brill /

Taylor Force, who was murdered in a Palestinian stabbing attack in Tel Aviv in March 2016. Photo: Facebook. – An organization comprised of dozens of former Israeli generals and security officials has spurred confusion regarding the Jewish state’s policy on the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) payments to terrorists and their families.

In mid-June, a group called “Commanders for Israel’s Security” (CIS) issued a statement directly contradicting the Israeli government’s official stance on Palestinian terror payments. In its statement, CIS asserted that passing the Taylor Force Act in the US would pose the risks of weakening the PA, and undermining the PA’s security cooperation with Israel.

The American legislation — which is named after a US Army veteran who was killed by a Palestinian terrorist in Jaffa in 2016 — would cut US economic aid to the PA if the organization continues to issue the terror payments. The Taylor Force Act has been endorsed by some in the Trump administration, and has broad bipartisan support on Capitol Hill.

Soon after CIS issued its statement against the legislation, a group of 13 retired Israeli security officials — notably comprised of individuals predominantly from the center-left of Israel’s political establishment — responded in an op-ed for the the Jerusalem Post, writing that CIS is “fundamentally mistaken” in its opposition to US efforts to punish the PA for incentivizing terrorism.

Related coverage

January 9, 2023 2:22 pm

Karl Pfeifer, Journalist Who Documented 20th Century With A Jewish Eye, Dies at 94: A Personal Memoriam

The death of Karl Pfeifer last Friday marks the end of an unforgettable and unparalleled chapter in the history of...

“The main obstacle to peace is the Palestinian attitude, and that has never changed,” Brig. Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser — director of the Project on Regional Middle East Developments at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA), and one of the signatories of the Jerusalem Post op-ed — told “The Palestinians still see themselves as being in a struggle, regardless of the fact that they [signed] the Oslo agreement with us back in 1993 — [and] they almost always ignore it.”

“Somebody has to tell them, ‘You have to sit at the table with a real intention to make peace,’ and there’s no way [for the PA] to promote peace while they keep paying salaries to terrorists,” Kuperwasser added.

Dan Diker, director of the Political Warfare Project at the JCPA, said that the Taylor Force Act “sends a very strong message to the PA leadership, which has not been sent before.” That message, he told, “is that you cannot claim to be a peace partner and fund terrorism at the same time…”

The CIS statement creates a major challenge for both Israel and the US, because it appears to convey conflicting messages coming from the Jewish state on issues of national security, Diker explained.

According to Diker, Israel’s typically vibrant and dramatic political discourse “gets mistranslated, frequently, into conclusions that are incorrectly drawn by US governments.” According to Diker, these conclusions “posit that Israel is prepared to make deep concessions both on the level of overlooking Palestinian violations of Oslo, and also violations of international law, for the sake of continued security cooperation.”

The current debate over the Taylor Force Act, Diker said, is “a perfect example” of a situation that is untenable for Israel, as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government has made definitive statements that the PA’s terror payments are completely unacceptable and must end.

The conundrum created by CIS, in Diker’s estimation, is that generals and security officials “who have done tremendous things for the state of Israel” have issued a collective political statement, which “[undermines] the clear message of the government of Israel.”

“[The CIS members] have a political agenda, and they say it clearly,” said Diker. “They have an interpretation of a two-state solution, and part of that interpretation is that Israel should at all costs prop up the PA. … [To them,] that includes overlooking a severe economic punishment of the PA for” paying terrorists and their families.

Diker said that CIS positions itself as representing the consensus view in Israel, which “is not true.”

“These commanders who stood up to CIS are not from the right wing. … These are people that come from the Labor Party, that come from the center-left part of the political map, and they’re saying that CIS is actually threatening to endanger Israel’s security by communicating opposition to the Taylor Force Act,” Diker said.

Diker added that the CIS statement also sends a confusing message to the American Jewish community, which may misinterpret the statement as representing the official stance of Israel’s security establishment.

CIS did not immediately return a request for comment from

Shawn Evenhaim, the chairman of the Israeli-American Coalition for Action advocacy group, which endorsed the Taylor Force Act, told that the US government “should use all tools its disposal, including its economic leverage, to pressure the Palestinian Authority to end the abhorrent culture of hate and the glorification of terrorism fostered by [the PA’s] official institutions. Ending incitement is in America’s interest, Israel’s interest and in the interest of everyone who seeks peace in the region.”

“We have been proud to help facilitate a bipartisan effort now underway in the US Congress to pass [the Taylor Force Act],” Evenhaim said, “ensuring that America addresses the issue of Palestinian incitement in a way that is both thoughtful and meaningful.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.