Wednesday, May 12th | 1 Sivan 5781

July 17, 2017 1:21 pm

Canada Attacks Israeli Wines While Exploiting Occupied Tibet

avatar by Shmuley Boteach


Bottles of Israeli wines. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

The Canadian government is reeling from a foiled attempt at a crusade against Israeli wines.

Last week, the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) — a crown-corporation with monopoly-rights to the sale of alcohol in Ontario — sent a letter to all of its vendors, forbidding them from selling wines from two leading Israeli vintners: the Psagot and Shilo Wineries. The reason: the labels say “Product of Israel.” And being located in the ancient biblical territories of Judea and Samaria, Canada will not allow the Israeli companies to write that.

According to Vincent Caron, the “senior adviser” at the LCBO who penned the letter, the decision came from higher-ups in the Canadian government, and originated from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. The agency apparently decided that for a wine produced in a disputed territory of the West Bank to be labeled as Israeli would “be considered misleading.”

This, despite the fact that the West Bank represents lands where the Israelite nation was born, where Jews have lived continuously for 3,000 years, and which Israel captured in a defensive war with Jordan.

Related coverage

May 11, 2021 12:32 pm

Why the Jerusalem Violence and Cancellation of PA Elections Are Closely Linked

Some of the recent violence seen in Jerusalem and the West Bank can be traced back to the fallout from...

After the Israeli government pointed out that the LCBO’s decision violated a bilateral trade-agreement. Canada rescinded the ban. Since that time, some have tried to frame this event as just another case of bureaucratic red-tape. I have to disagree. This was, rather, a classic and unfortunate case of anti-Israel bias on the part of a government that is usually a strong Israel ally.

Firstly, it’s odd enough that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency would appoint itself the enforcer of international boundaries, especially since its official aim is — according to its website — to “mitigate risks to public health associated with diseases and other health hazards in the food supply system.”

But worse than being odd, the agency’s decision is clearly based less on a desire to enforce Canadian law than on a blatant bias against Israel. After all, it bears the two tell-tale trademarks of what might normally pass as antisemitic: namely, the enforcement of a double-standard against the Jewish state, and, of course, blatant hypocrisy.

With regard to the double-standard, it’s fairly clear: Israel is singled out while other blatant offenders walk free. One need only skim some Canadian retailer websites to see just how true this is.

Zatoun Fair-Trade Olive Oil is sold at nearly one hundred stores throughout Canada, and comes, as its label indicates, “from the hills of Palestine.” Which is interesting, because Canada only supports a “Palestinian state, as part of a comprehensive, just and lasting peace settlement.” Until that peace settlement is reached, however, there is no Canadian-recognized state of Palestine, and Zatouns Palestine label should be considered at least as misleading as those of Israeli wineries.

Nor does the Canadian government seem to care to enforce its anti-Israel policy on the labels of products coming from Tibet, which has been occupied and brutalized by China for 67 years.

In Canada, you can buy Earth Circle Organics’ Tibetan Plateau Goji Berries, which — though hailing from “The Tibetan Plateau” — are clearly marked as a product of China. 

By the way, with regard to Tibet, Canada doesn’t just ignore China’s brutal occupation — the Canadians actually exploit it.

And therein lies the appalling hypocrisy.

China has abused the occupied lands of Tibet in one of the worst ways that an occupying power can — namely, by mining. Mining in Tibet has not only robbed the Tibetan people of their very resources, but it has polluted their water sources, destroyed their local grasslands, brought a severe risk of landslides and irreversibly changed Tibet’s historic landscape.

Yet, following China’s 2007 announcement of exploiting vast deposits of copper, iron, lead, silver, lithium, and zinc throughout Tibet, a staggering seven Canadian companies jumped to develop mines in the territory, with most already actively mining by 2011. To be clear, they paid China, not Tibet, for the mining rights.

While some Canadian mine companies did sell the rights of their newly-opened Tibetan mines back to Chinese companies, they did so only after they’d already made phenomenal sums off of Tibetans’ backs. For example, Canadian mining giant Hunter-Dickinson’s sold Continental-Minerals, and with it the rights to their Tibetan mine, for almost half a billion dollars — the largest asset-sale in their 30 years of operation.

Far worse than being complicit in theft from the Tibetan people, Canadian mining companies have also caused irreversible, and often deadly, damage.

In 2011, the Chinese minister of land and resources warned that the ecology of the Tibetan plateau is “extremely fragile.” His warnings, however, were ignored by Canadian and Chinese companies alike, with tragic consequencesIn March of 2013, a landslide at the Jiama copper and gold mine killed 83 miners. That mine was controlled by China Gold International Resources, another Canadian-based company.

That mine, it should also be mentioned, is in the Gyama valley — which the Tibetan people revere as one of their most sacred sites. They have tried, in the past, to protest the desecration and devastation caused to these sacred lands by Canadian mining companies, with similarly tragic consequences. In 2010, four Tibetans were murdered and 30 others hurt when Chinese mining officials opened fire on crowds protesting the expansion of mine operations in their sacred homeland. In 2013, further protests saw another Tibetan activist shot to death by police.

As if Canada couldn’t be more involved with the exploitation of Tibet, the creation of these mines was only made possible in 2006 with the opening of the Qinghai-Tibet Rail Line, which allowed for the import of mining materials and machinery into Tibet. That rail line was made possible largely through the Bombardier Sifang Power Transportation company, a joint venture between three entities — two of which are Canadian.

Canadian companies seem knee-deep in some pretty serious exploitation of an occupied territory in the world today. Yet, Canada didn’t seem nearly as worried about that as checking the labels on Israeli wine.

While they might have failed this time around, those behind this bizarre and biased action are likely to be back.

Shmuley Boteach, “America’s Rabbi,” whom the Washington Post calls “the most famous Rabbi in America,” is founder of The World Values Network and is the international best-selling author of 30 books, including Kosher Sex and Kosher Lust. Follow him on Twitter @RabbiShmuley.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.