Is the Jewish Left Being Censored?
JNS.org – Is a “mobilized faction” in the American Jewish community attempting to “censor” dovish views? The president of The Forward newspaper thinks so, but other editors and leaders of some left-of-center Jewish organizations see things differently.
The present dispute arose from the July 12 episode of the Jewish Broadcasting Service (JBS) television series L’Chayim, which featured a panel discussion on freedom of speech in the Jewish community.
At the center of the discussion was the Forward’s decision to publish a full-page ad in its June 2 edition from Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP); the ad supported imprisoned Palestinian terrorist Marwan Barghouti.
At the time, The Forward’s publisher, Rachel Fishman Feddersen, said that she decided to run the ad because “mass media itself is on the firing line, and freedom of expression is under pressure from our own government.” In the July 12 television segment, The Forward’s president, Samuel Norich, said that freedom of speech is “endangered” because “there is a mobilized faction in the Jewish community that is seeking to censor.”
Asked by JNS.org to identify the individuals or organizations to whom he was referring, Norich responded, “I have no further comment.”
Yet some editors have denied that claim of censorship.
“I don’t feel pressured or censored,” Rob Golub, the editor of the Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle, told JNS.org. “I don’t think any alleged restriction of points of view [is] a meaningful problem in the media today. There’s all the opinion you could ever want on Twitter. Nobody is sitting around thinking to themselves, ‘Darn, I only wish in 2017 I could get access to more opinions.’”
“Is [Norich] suggesting there is a group [that has] formally joined forces to silence the Jewish press?” asked Judie Jacobson, editor-in-chief of the Connecticut Jewish Ledger. “If so, he needs to ‘out’ that group. Name them. Shame them. … It is incumbent upon him to be more specific.”
Hillel Goldberg, executive editor of Colorado’s Intermountain Jewish News, Mordecai Specktor, publisher and editor of Minnesota’s American Jewish World and David Ben-Hooren, publisher of New York’s The Jewish Voice, told JNS.org that no factions in the Jewish community have attempted to censor their newspapers.
Some left-of-center Jewish organizations likewise report no efforts to silence them. Ori Nir, a spokesman for Americans for Peace Now (APN), said that there have been no attempts to prevent officials of his organization from publishing articles or speaking in public forums, nor any pressure on newspapers to reject the group’s advertisements. He said, however, that there have been instances in which editors turned down APN’s op-eds because they were deemed “too sensitive” or “too controversial” — although he said that many other newspapers have published them.
Partners for Progressive Israel (PPI) — the US affiliate of Israel’s left-wing Meretz political party — has encountered some “attempts to silence us,” according to Dr. Maya Haber, PPI’s director of programming and strategy. She cited the fact that PPI’s Detroit chapter has not been allowed to participate in that community’s Walk for Israel for the past several years. Organizers of the event said that PPI was excluded because it promotes the boycott of Israelis who reside beyond the pre-1967 lines.
Granate Sosnoff, the communications strategist for JVP, the group at the center of the original controversy, told JNS.org has denied a coordinated effort to censor the group.
“This does not mean that ongoing attempts to silence us by intimidation and other means do not occur,” she said, pointing to anonymous posters that recently appeared in the neighborhood where JVP Executive Director Rebecca Vilkomerson resides. The unsigned posters criticized JVP for working with American Muslims for Palestine, a group the Anti-Defamation League says “has at times provided a platform for antisemitism.”
Former Union of Reform Judaism President Rabbi Eric Yoffie, who was part of the July 12 JBS panel, said that he has received harassing emails in response to some of his articles, but “they come from individuals, not organizations, and they don’t bother me.”
“Generally speaking, I believe that we are blessed with a lively and open discussion in the American Jewish community, and I don’t see much evidence that freedom of speech is endangered in any way,” Yoffie said.
Another participant in the JBS television discussion, Amanda Berman, director of legal affairs at the Lawfare Project, told JNS.org that there is “a censorship problem related to Jewish and pro-Israel advocacy, but Sam Norich’s position on that problem is entirely inverted.” She pointed to recent instances in which pro-Israel speakers and events on college campuses have been disrupted or shut down “by raging mobs chanting genocidal slogans and expletives.” Instead of focusing on such activities, The Forward “has now set a precedent [by publishing the Barghouti advertisement] that its pages are a welcome place for terrorists aiming to perpetuate genocidal viewpoints and outright lies,” Berman said.
“No one silenced The Forward,” said New York University legal scholar Thane Rosenbaum, who also took part in the July 12 JBS panel discussion. “They made this decision without anyone’s help. If they were a true Jewish news source, they would have practiced self-censorship, and not given voice and moral support to a killer of Jews.”