Saturday, June 23rd | 10 Tammuz 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

September 12, 2017 4:47 pm

British Cabinet Minister: UK Will Celebrate 100th Anniversary of Balfour Declaration ‘With Pride’

avatar by Barney Breen-Portnoy

Email a copy of "British Cabinet Minister: UK Will Celebrate 100th Anniversary of Balfour Declaration ‘With Pride’" to a friend

Sajid Javid, the UK’s secretary of state for communities and local government. Photo: Foreign and Commonwealth Office via Wikimedia Commons.

The United Kingdom will celebrate the 100th anniversary of the issuance of the Balfour Declaration “with pride,” a British Cabinet minister said on Monday.

At a meeting in the British capital with a visiting World Jewish Congress delegation, Sajid Javid — the secretary of state for communities and local government — stated, “Someone said we should apologize for the declaration, to say it was an error of judgment. Of course that’s not going to happen. To apologize for the Balfour Declaration would be to apologize for the existence of Israel and to question its right to exist.”

In the Balfour Declaration, which was published in November 1917, the British government announced its support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.”

Last year, the Palestinian Authority said it intended to sue the UK over the declaration, claiming it had led to a “catastrophe” for the Palestinian people. And last September, PA President Mahmoud Abbas — during a UN General Assembly address – called on the UK to apologize for the declaration.

Related coverage

June 22, 2018 3:42 pm

After Death Threats, South African Model Pledges to ‘Re-Educate’ Herself With BDS ‘Visit to Palestine’

A South African model who faced death threats after excoriating the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas for its abuses in the...

In his remarks on Monday, Javid — a member of Prime Minister Theresa May’s Conservative Party — highlighted the ongoing failure of the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement to harm UK-Israel ties.

“I’ll be 100 percent clear,” he said. “I do not support calls for a boycott, my party does not support calls for a boycott. For all its bluster, the BDS campaign is most notable I think, for its lack of success.”

“Trade is booming, tourism is soaring,” he continued. “The media campaign is full of sound and fury, but to the majority of Britain today it signifies nothing.”

“As long as I’m in government, as long as I’m in politics, I will do everything in my power to fight back against those who seek to undermine Israel,” Javid vowed.

Addressing the same delegation, House of Commons Speaker John Bercow cautioned that Jews across the globe still faced a “pernicious and insidious” danger.

“There are still people denying the Holocaust or alternatively glorying in it and holding up Adolf Hitler as being a great figure in our history,” he said. “So we should not be paranoid, but equally we should not be complacent. There is a threat to Jewish people and to Jewish security in this country and indeed in Europe and around the world.”

“The importance of Jewish history, of Jewish culture, Jewish identity and indeed of Jewish security, both physical and political, can scarcely be overstated,” Bercow — the first-ever Jewish House of Commons speaker — continued.

WJC President Ronald Lauder — in London for his organization’s Executive Committee meeting, hosted by the Board of Deputies of British Jews — said on Monday, “Anti-Semitism is growing across the globe and is targeting all Jews, whether Orthodox or Reform, Left or Right. The most important goal facing the WJC today in our daily and global struggle against anti-Semitism is mending the divisive rifts and building Jewish unity — between all organizations, and regardless of religious denominations or political affiliations.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Matt McLaughlin

    Anthony Cooper 7th Earl of Shaftesbury is father of Israel.
    Jews along for the ride, 1917

  • Ken Kelso

    1936 – as desperate Jews tried to flee Hitler, not a single visa was granted for them in Jewish Mandate Palestine

  • MorganCourtenay

    As a first-generation Briton, I am proud that this country spearheaded the movement to return the Jewish homeland to its ancestral inheritants. Long live Israel.

  • According to International law and agreements Palestine is Jewish Land
    Extensive research establishes the following facts.
    If you read the 1917 Balfour Declaration (Which emulated Napoleons 1799 letter to the Jewish community in Palestine promising that The National Home for The Jewish people will be reestablished in Palestine, as the Jews are the rightful owners). Nowhere does it state an Arab entity west of The Jordan Rive. The San Remo Conference of 1920 does not state an Arab entity west of The Jordan River. It was confirmed in Article 95 of the Treaty of Sevres on August 1920. The Mandate for Palestine terms does not state an Arab entity west of the Jordan River. It specifically states a Jewish National Home in Palestine without limiting the Jewish territory in Palestine. It also states that the British should work with the Jewish Agency as the official representative of the Jews in Palestine to implement the National Home of the Jewish people in Palestine. I stress again; nowhere does it state that an Arab entity should be implemented west of the Jordan River.
    As a matter of historical record, The British reallocated over 77% of Jewish Palestine to the Arab-Palestinians in 1922 with specific borders and Jordan took over additional territory like the Gulf of Aqaba which was not part of the allocation to Jordan.

    No where in any of the above stated agreements does it provides for an Arab entity west of the Jordan River. It specifically states political right to the Jewish people. The U.N. resolutions are non-binding with no legal standing. The Oslo Accords are no longer valid.
    YJ Draiman

  • watsa46

    What about the Foreign Office and BBC?

  • Reb_Yaakov

    Left and Right are illegitimate alternatives to Orthodox and Reform because they are secular, non-Jewish ideologies that supplant Jewish ideology and become, in themselves, religions for their adherents. Jewish organizations should be supporting Judaism.