Sunday, December 17th | 29 Kislev 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
October 31, 2017 6:27 pm

Alan Dershowitz: The Forward’s Defense of an Antisemitic Cartoon Is Unacceptable

avatar by Alan Dershowitz

Email a copy of "Alan Dershowitz: The Forward’s Defense of an Antisemitic Cartoon Is Unacceptable" to a friend

Memorial Glade and Sather Tower on the campus of the University of California, Berkeley. Photo: Gku.

When the official newspaper of Berkeley published a color caricature of me as a spider-like creature with one leg stomping on a Palestinian child and another holding an IDF soldier spilling the blood of an unarmed Palestinian, there was universal condemnation of what was widely seen as a throwback to the antisemitic imagery of the Nazi era. The chancellor condemned the cartoon, stating that, “its antisemitic imagery connects directly to the centuries-old ‘blood libel’ that falsely accused Jews of engaging in ritual murder.”

Writing in the Daily Cal, students from a pro-Israel organization at Berkeley debunked the claim that the cartoonist and the student paper editors at the Daily Cal could not have known that this cartoon was seeped in traditional antisemitic stereotyping, when considering its deep roots in European, and even American, publications.

In the cartoon, Dershowitz is depicted with a hooked nose and a body of a large amorphous black sphere. His exaggerated head and contorted legs and hands evoke images of a spider. The rhetoric of Jews as ‘invasive’ insects in society, trying to take over resources and power, has long been used to justify violence, persecution and murder. The two elements of the cartoon, with Dershowitz’s face in the front and the black body in the back, plays into the antisemitic trope of Jews as shape-shifting, sub-human entities using deception and trickery in order to advance their own agendas. This rhetoric is nowhere more common than in Nazi propaganda, and can be traced far beyond WWII in European and American media.

The students also wrote about the “pain” the antisemitic cartoon had caused them:

To a Jewish student on this campus, seeing this cartoon in the Daily Cal is a reminder that we are not always welcome in the spaces we call home…

Telling Jews that we can or cannot define what is offensive to us, because of our status as privileged minority in the United States, is antisemitic.

Some students also pointed to the swastika that had defaced my picture on a poster outside Berkeley Law School, as evidence of a pervasive antisemitism disguised as anti-Zionism on that campus.

Not surprisingly, it was only an op-ed writer for the Forward who not only denied that the imagery was antisemitic, but actually justified it:

The mere appearance of blood near a Jew is not a blood libel. The State of Israel has an army, and that army sometimes kills Palestinians, including women and children. When you prick those people, I am told, they bleed. It is perverse to demand of artists that they represent actual, real Israeli violence without blood, just because European Christians invented a fake accusation.

The original antisemitic cartoon published in Berkeley’s Daily Cal.

But how then does the writer justify my depiction as a hulky black spider with an overbearing shape and twisted spider-like hands – imagery traditionally used to depict Jews as offensive, venomous insects. The Forward also did not show readers the color cartoon. Instead they showed them a black and white version that makes it harder to see the spider like imagery.

Echoing the editor of the Daily Cal, the op-ed writer published by the Forward also argued that the cartoon was a legitimate criticism of my talk. But the cartoonist has now admitted that he didn’t hear my talk. Nor did the Daily Cal report on it. Had they listened, they would have heard a pro-peace, pro two-state, pro compromise proposal.

Would the Forward publish an op-ed that justified comparable images of women, blacks or gays? The baseball player, Yuli Gurriel, who made a slanted-eye gesture was also reflecting the “truth” about facial differences, but no one would suggest that it wasn’t a racist stereotype.

By publishing an op-ed that defends bigoted caricatures only of a Jewish supporter of Israel –when no college newspaper would ever peddle stereotypes of other ethnic, religious or social groups – the Forward too engages in an unacceptable double standard.

Alan M. Dershowitz is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard Law School and author of “Trumped Up! How Criminalization of Political Differences Endangers Democracy,” which is now available.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • glsfbg

    The “Forward” is not the “Jewish Daily Forward” of the past. The “Forward” is a left wing rag that espouses anti-Jewish, anti-Israel positions & promulgates these positions as if they are Jewish. This is the proverbial wolf in sheep’s clothing. The “Forward” is no friend of Israel or Jews.

  • Ilbert Phillips

    What is occurring on campuses throughout the United State and much of Western Europe is the revival of anti-Semitism. The source of narrative is the leftist take over of the intellectual community and professor’s at these universities. They have infantilized those Muslims and particularly the Palestinians who hate Jews and whose goal is to destroy the state of Israel, not make peace with it. The Palestinians are treated as the underdogs, though they continue over the years to attack Israel and lose wars they start. There is nothing worse than an intellectual stuck in stupid.

  • ricardo

    I saw the caricature. I thought it came from a Nazi or KKK site, but I was crushed when I realized it was published in the Berkeley Forward.

    Bear in mind that I was the one saying that the difference between Antifa and the White Supremacist groups is that while the latter is associated with a dark past in which unfathomable cruelty happened, the former will have a very dark future linked with unspeakable acts of cruelty.

  • SteveC1

    The Forward’s writer of this particular op-ed piece was clearly WAY “off base” on this one; I’m surprised it actually “made it to print.”

  • Fred

    USA is regressing to the anti Semitic Roosevelt & segregationist period of the 30-40. Pity nations do not learn from the immediate past ,still sticking in the same morrass..

  • Diane

    For goodness sake, what do you expect? It’s The Forward!

  • Joshua Laskin

    Perhaps Alan can demonstrate what’s acceptable, by drawing an anti-Zionist cartoon that’s both interesting and amusing. It may not be so easy as it looks.

  • rosielu

    The Forwards is a disgusting anti-Jewish, anti-Israel,self-hating publication. They are a disgrace.
    Their MO is to follow the footsteps of all the haters of Israel and the Jewish people. The Forwards believes if they do or say the sort of things that our enemies say…then the enemies will love us. No that will not happen. Disgrace to the Forwards. I hope people stop reading them.

  • allioops

    horrible bigotry towards a Jewish person; once again

  • Our own worst enemy has always been secular, atheist leftists who were born to Jewish parents. I contend that if you don’t believe in HaShem, you are not a Jew. You have Jewish ancestors. Of course, that won’t matter when the Jew killers come for us again.

Algemeiner.com