Sunday, November 18th | 10 Kislev 5779

Subscribe
December 3, 2017 3:12 pm

Experts: No Chance Hamas Will Disarm, Despite Unity Government

avatar by Adam Abrams / JNS.org

Email a copy of "Experts: No Chance Hamas Will Disarm, Despite Unity Government" to a friend

Hamas terrorists in the southern Gaza Strip town of Rafah in January 2017. Photo: Abed Rahim Khatib/ Flash90.

JNS.org – As a joint Palestinian government seems poised to take control of Gaza, Hamas has defied calls to disarm — and has vowed to move its battle against Israel to Judea and Samaria. But experts say that Gaza’s impending power transfer, as well as Hamas’ threat, are both unlikely to materialize.

Fatah, the political party headed by Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas, announced in October that it would reconcile with Hamas and form a unity government. Israel and the US reacted by calling on Hamas to disarm and recognize Israel.

As recently as this week, Hamas has continued its refusal to disarm.

“These weapons will not be touched,” Khalil al-Hayya, a senior Hamas official, told reporters in Gaza. “It’s not for debate or talks. These weapons will clearly move to the West Bank to battle the [Israeli] occupation there. It’s our right to fight the occupation until it ends.”

Related coverage

November 16, 2018 10:39 am
0

How Hamas Wins

Hamas wins. That’s the worst sentence to write. When this happens, the people of the Gaza Strip lose and the...

In response to the Hamas threat, the IDF told JNS.org in a statement that it “continues to monitor the ongoing events in the region, and is prepared to face any threat.”

Despite Hamas’ rhetoric, experts maintain that the terror group is incapable of actually relocating its weapons to the disputed territories, while expressing confidence in Israel’s ability to mitigate the threat.

“We should certainly take Hamas’ threats about escalating violence in the West Bank seriously, but we should also understand that the PA and Israel have maintained a security relationship that is designed to mitigate these threats,” Grant Rumley, an expert on Palestinian politics and a research fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told JNS.org.

“Taken in light of the recent reconciliation negotiations, Hamas’ threats are aimed at the PA’s ongoing security coordination with Israel, which is a deeply unpopular issue among many Palestinians,” he said.

Brig. Gen. (ret.) Shlomo Brom, a senior research associate at the Tel Aviv-based Institute for National Security Studies, agreed with Rumley, saying that Hamas’ threat is “empty” and asserting that the terror group is “not capable” of transferring weapons to Judea and Samaria.

“[Hamas] cannot do this directly through Israel,” which separates Gaza from Judea and Samaria, Brom explained.

Attempting to smuggle weapons from Gaza to Egypt and then through Jordan into the disputed territories is also an unrealistic option for Hamas, said Brom, a former director of the Strategic Planning Division in the IDF General Staff.

“The border between Jordan and [Judea and Samaria] is very effectively controlled by Israel and Jordan with close cooperation between the two,” Brom added, noting that numerous past attempts by Hamas to initiate terror attacks in Judea and Samaria have ended in failure due to close security cooperation between Israel and the PA.

Brom also expressed skepticism regarding the significance of the Egyptian-brokered transition from Hamas rule to PA control in Gaza, emphasizing that there is “zero” probability of “security authority and control of the military arm of Hamas” being transferred to the PA. That reality, he said, makes “a significant change” in Israeli-Palestinian relations implausible.

Rumley concurred, saying that he remains “very skeptical” of a genuine transfer of power in Gaza.

“Already we see Hamas unions blocking PA employees from resuming their duties in government ministries,” said Rumley, adding that “huge hurdles” to genuine Palestinian unity stem from long-standing “animosity” between Hamas and Fatah, as well as “donor fatigue plaguing the PA.”

Indeed, in a possible sign that the unity deal is on shaky ground, the power transfer — which was scheduled to be implemented on December 1 — was delayed by 10 days on November 29 after Hamas prevented PA employees from returning to their positions at several government ministries.

In a statement issued later that day, Fatah and Hamas requested that Egypt delay the power transfer to allow the Palestinian rivals to “complete the arrangements to successfully conclude reconciliation steps,” prompting Egypt to send high-ranking intelligence officials to Gaza to mediate the impasse.

The emergence of such a dispute on the eve of the power transfer is reminiscent of the Palestinian unity government formed between Fatah and Hamas in 2014. That joint government collapsed a year later after making little progress on reconciling the deep split between the Palestinian factions.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com