Tuesday, March 19th | 9 Adar II 5784

Subscribe
December 15, 2017 11:56 am
0

NYPD: Fighting Terrorism on Three Sides

× [contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

avatar by Patrick Dunleavy

Opinion

A New York City Police (NYPD) officer stands in the subway corridor, at the New York Port Authority subway station, near the site of an attempted detonation the day before, in New York City, Dec. 12, 2017. Photo: Reuters / Brendan McDermid.

As if the New York Police Department (NYPD)’s task in keeping the city safe from ISIS-inspired terrorists wasn’t arduous enough, it now is faced with other adversarial forces that often hinder effective counter-terrorism measures.

In recent weeks, two terror attacks targeted the city; they were committed by self-acknowledged soldiers of ISIS. The first attack occurred when Sayfullo Saipov, an Uzbek national, drove a rented truck into a crowd of pedestrians near Ground Zero on Halloween. Eight people were killed, and another 12 wounded, making it the deadliest attack on the city since 9/11. The second terrorist attack came at the height of the rush hour on Monday morning, when Bangladeshi immigrant Akayed Ullah detonated a pipe bomb strapped to his chest in a crowded subway tunnel underneath the Port Authority.

The response by the NYPD, the Fire Department and the Port Authority Police was nothing short of outstanding. They quickly took control of both areas under attack and apprehended the terrorists. Saipov was shot by an NYPD officer as he yelled “Allah Akbar,” brandishing what appeared to be two firearms. And Ullah, instead of waking up to 72 virgins, found himself handcuffed by Port Authority police officers after his bomb malfunctioned, and he lay on the ground with burns and injuries to his torso.

Immediately following the truck rampage by Saipov, who admitted to police that he had pledged himself to ISIS, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio agreed with the statement Deputy Commissioner of Intelligence and Counterterrorism John Miller made to the press that this attack “isn’t about Islam” or about “what mosque he attends.” This was the same mayor who gutted a major part of the city’s counter-terrorism surveillance initiative, which was created by the NYPD’s Intelligence Division in 2006. De Blasio also attacked the NYPD’s report titled, “Radicalization in the West: The Homegrown Threat.” The report was an eye opening tutorial on how and where Islamic radicalization takes place. The mayor called that program “broken.”

If that were not enough, the New York City Council is considering a bill that would force the police department to disclose — in public reports — the specific tactics and resources that it uses when investigating terrorism. The bill would also limit when the police could enter a suspect’s residence or stop and question a person.

Political correctness handicaps the police. Americans, by and large, are not happy when political correctness replaces common sense, particularly when it comes to preventing terrorist attacks. The New York Post editorial board went so far as to say that the people of New York would no longer tolerate such hindrances on law enforcement: “New Yorkers don’t want a police department that merely arrives at the scene of a tragedy to pick up the pieces. They want attacks like Monday’s prevented.”

The third challenge facing law enforcement agencies like the NYPD when fighting terrorism is the negative attacks from activist groups like the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Immediately following Monday’s explosion, NYPD detectives and members of the Joint Terrorism Task Force rushed to several apartments in Brooklyn, where the suspected bomb maker Akayed Ullah lived. As a normal police procedure, they evacuated the building and began a search — not only for evidence, but also for the possibility of additional improvised explosive devices (IEDs) that Ullah may have constructed.

That evening, while the investigation was still ongoing, CAIR-NY legal director Albert Fox Cahn issued a statement on behalf of the Ullah family complaining about the police department’s action. I guess CAIR thought that the police should have left young children in the building where a bomb may have been. This is the same organization that accused the NYPD of spying on Muslims.

And this is not its first go round with those who are charged with protecting the United States from terrorists. In fact, in recent years, CAIR officials have actually encouraged members of the Muslim community to refuse to cooperate with law enforcement agencies investigating terrorism. They have also portrayed cops as villains not to be trusted.

Facing the terrorist threat head-on is not something that the NYPD shrinks back from. On the contrary, the men and women whose remarkable service has kept us safe welcome the fight. But it sure would be a lot easier if they didn’t have to constantly look over their shoulders to battle politically-correct politicians and the activist groups who never get the facts straight.

IPT Senior Fellow Patrick Dunleavy is the former deputy inspector general for New York State Department of Corrections and author of  “The Fertile Soil of Jihad.” He currently teaches a class on terrorism for the United States Military Special Operations School.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.