Tuesday, June 19th | 6 Tammuz 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
March 19, 2018 6:12 pm

Ambassador Friedman to Jerusalem Antisemitism Conference: The ‘New’ Antisemitism Worries Me More Than the Old

avatar by Benjamin Kerstein

Email a copy of "Ambassador Friedman to Jerusalem Antisemitism Conference: The ‘New’ Antisemitism Worries Me More Than the Old" to a friend

US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman at the Western Wall in Jerusalem, May 15, 2017. Photo: Rob Ghost / Flash90.

US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman told a packed house at the opening of the 6th Global Forum on Combating Antisemitism that a “new” antisemitism, characterized by “the irrational, deceitful, and insidious vilification of Israel and its supporters under the guise of political commentary” worries him far more than the “old” antisemitism.

Friedman spoke on behalf of President Donald Trump and his administration at the International Convention Center in Jerusalem, telling the audience that “combating” antisemitism is “the right verb.”

“Usually when we speak about efforts to end a disease—and make no mistake about it, antisemitism is a disease, it is a virulent disease—we speak about eradicating it,” he said. “But we don’t speak about eradicating antisemitism and I think that’s probably the right approach. Eradication is probably a bridge too far.”

Citing the passage in the Passover Haggadah that states “in every generation they rise up against us,” Friedman noted, “The authors of the Haggadah did not see antisemitism as capable of being eradicated some 2,000 years ago. And regrettably, today, neither do I. … But combating it is something we can do. It is a sacred responsibility we inherited from our parents and something we must leave to our children.”

Related coverage

June 18, 2018 11:26 am
0

Netanyahu Gets Impromptu Visit From Head of Indonesia’s Largest Muslim Organization

JNS.org - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu got an impromptu meeting with the leader of Indonesia’s largest Muslim organization. Yahya Cholil Staquf,...

Friedman, however, sought to differentiate between what he called the “old” antisemitism and the “new.”

Recounting how the American town of Bal Harbour once barred Jewish residents, Friedman said, “I wish I could say the old antisemitism is a thing of the past,” but “with the internet, the old antisemitism has a distribution channel that the old antisemites … could only have dreamed of. … I worry about the old antisemitism, but I never doubt that we will prevail in our fight against it.”

This “old” antisemitism, however, has been superseded. “The new antisemitism worries me a bit more,” Friedman said. “It is the irrational, deceitful, and insidious vilification of Israel and its supporters under the guise of political commentary. It is just a cleverly repackaged form of hatred against the Jewish people.”

Friedman also asserted that this new antisemitism is acceptable in polite society in a way the old antisemitism is not.

“There are places in Manhattan—where I worked for 35 years—where if you attended a cocktail party and said ‘I hate Jews,’ then you would be politely escorted to the door,” he stated. “But if you said, ‘Isn’t it a shame that after Jews survived the Holocaust, they turned into Nazis themselves against the Palestinians,’ if you said that, you might be offered another drink and invited to hold court on your interesting point of view.”

Ultimately, Friedman said, “To accuse Israel of Nazism, apartheid, or institutional bigotry because of well-intentioned, good faith efforts to protect its inhabitants against terrorism is to be an antisemite plain and simple.”

In the US, Friedman continued, the epicenter of this new antisemitism is in academia. “I think now, our biggest issue in regard to the United States with antisemitism is on college campuses,” he stated. “Pro-Israel students are under siege. Pro-Israel professors are not getting tenure.”

He recounted an anecdote about a debate at Columbia University with anti-Zionist intellectual Edward Said, saying, “the conversation was respectful, it was civil, and it was thoughtful.” In 2007, then-Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmedinejad—an openly genocidal antisemite—was invited to speak at Columbia, where “he was treated respectfully, far more so than Israeli speakers.”

In 2017, Friedman noted, Israel’s ambassador to the UN Danny Danon, “hardly a controversial figure in Israeli politics, was shouted down when he addressed the students of Columbia. … And you can multiply that by colleges and universities throughout the United States.”

“We never want to interfere with academic freedom,” Friedman said, “but we must bring an end to academic hypocrisy.”

The ambassador concluded by hailing President Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, calling it “a shot right through the heart of the new antisemitism. And let’s hope it is just the beginning.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Aleteia

    Why so many Jews in the West are against Israel and Western Civilization? It wouldn’t be even close as much anti-Semitism without the “good job” done by the School of Frankfurt who poisoned the academia. And they were Jews. Basically is a Jew against Jew war, with allies on both sides.

  • Ash

    Antisemitism is overused — now is diluted to such an extent that nobody gives a hoot to it. Anything which is true but not in favor of Israel is cried from the roof tops as antisemitism — People are not fooled by it anymore – and with the internet it is not possible to hide your deeds behind the curtain of antisemitism.

  • Fuzzy Ashkenazim

    Anti-Semitism is ultimately satans various strategies of preventing God from fulfilling His Covenant to Abraham.

  • Vile Pagan, Christian and Islamic Antisemitism is one of the oldest diseases of humanity that an antidote was not discovered till date.
    Another integral part of that virus is the spead of blood libels against the Jewish people using western, Islamic and social media organisations.

    The most dangerous antisemites are those self-hating autoantisemitic so called Jews.

    One way open today to combat this global scourge is slapping law suits against those who propagate this dangerous virus.

    Do not stay silent in the face of this aggression against our people.
    Chop off the snake’s head each time someone raises it.

    • Aleteia

      It is plenty of Christophobia as well, just that Christians have not awakened yet!

  • Reb_Yaakov

    People who talk about diseases using militaristic terminology usually don’t know what they’re talking about. It’s a non-Jewish approach, one based on the concept that killing and beating and conquering are the solution to every problem, and it is doomed to failure. Part of the Jewish medical approach to chronic diseases is dealing with them in a positive manner: if prevention fails and a cure is not possible, then try to bolster the integrity and defense mechanisms of the body as much as possible through healthful means. It would be helpful to think of dealing with the chronic disease called Judeophobia in a similar manner.

  • rabbimfriedman@yahoo.com

    THERE IS A MORE AGGRESSIVE APPROACH TO ANTI-SEMITISM VERBAL AND PHYSICAL .

Algemeiner.com